e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 1-10466
The St. Joe Company
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Florida
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
59-0432511
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
245 Riverside Avenue,
Suite 500
Jacksonville, Florida
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
32202
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(904) 301-4200
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, no par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large Accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants Common Stock
held by non-affiliates based on the closing price on
June 30, 2006, was approximately $3.22 billion.
As of February 22, 2007, there were 104,471,012 shares
of Common Stock, no par value, issued and 74,370,980 shares
outstanding, with 30,100,032 shares of treasury stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement for
the Annual Meeting of our Shareholders to be held on
May 15, 2007 (the proxy statement) are
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report. Other
documents incorporated by reference in this Report are listed in
the Exhibit Index.
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
* |
|
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of our
Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2007, are incorporated
by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K. |
1
PART I
As used throughout this
Form 10-K
Annual Report, the terms we, JOE,
Company and Registrant mean The St. Joe
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context
indicates otherwise.
JOE is one of the largest real estate development companies in
Florida. We believe that we are the largest private landowner in
the State of Florida. The majority of our land is located in
Northwest Florida. We own approximately 805,000 acres,
approximately 334,000 acres of which are within ten miles
of the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.
We are engaged in town and resort development and operations,
commercial and industrial development and rural land sales. We
also have significant interests in timber. We believe we are one
of the few real estate development companies to have assembled
the range of real estate, financial, marketing and regulatory
expertise necessary to take a large-scale approach to real
estate development and services. We believe we have a number of
key business strengths and competitive advantages, including one
of the largest inventories of private land suitable for
development in Florida, as well as a very low cost basis in our
land.
Our four operating segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
|
Rural Land Sales
|
|
|
|
Forestry
|
Our mission is to create a family of places in Northwest Florida
that inspire people and make the region an even better place to
live, work and play. We seek to accomplish our mission and
create value by securing higher and better land-use
entitlements, facilitating infrastructure improvements,
developing community amenities, undertaking strategic and expert
land planning and development, parceling our land holdings in
creative ways and performing land restoration and enhancement.
Over the past ten years, we have created an array of imaginative
real estate products ranging from beachfront resorts and
suburban, primary neighborhoods to commerce parks and rural
recreational properties. Going forward, we will continue to
reposition our timberland holdings for higher and better uses in
order to optimize the value of our core real estate assets in
Northwest Florida.
Recent
Developments
Our business has experienced the following developments since
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
We experienced a significant decline in sales in our residential
real estate business in 2006, especially in our resort
communities. Florida, like many other states across the nation,
experienced dramatic slowdowns in its residential real estate
markets in 2006, as compared to the record-setting residential
real estate activity of the past several years. This real estate
slowdown was reflected in our results of operations. We had net
income of $51.0 million in 2006, compared to net income of
$126.7 million in 2005.
|
|
|
|
Our residential land-use entitlements pipeline increased to
approximately 44,300 units as of December 31, 2006.
This pipeline is made up of units where entitlements have been
obtained, as well as units which are in the entitlements
process. These land-use entitlements cover a broad spectrum of
potential products, markets and price points. In addition, at
year end JOE had approximately 14.5 million square feet of
commercial land-use entitlements in hand or in process, plus an
additional 627 acres zoned for commercial uses.
|
|
|
|
The Panama City Bay County Airport and Industrial
District is seeking to move the Panama City-Bay County
International Airport to a site in western Bay County located on
land that we own. In September 2006, the Federal Aviation
Administration issued its Record of Decision approving the
relocation of the airport to the West Bay site. An appeal of the
Record of Decision has been filed by
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
the Natural Resources Defense Council and other petitioners. The
Airport Authority has received all state permits necessary to
move forward with the relocation of the airport, but the Army
Corps of Engineers must issue a Section 404 permit before
construction can commence. The relocation of the airport is also
dependent on adequate funding. We have agreed to donate
4,000 acres to the Airport Authority for the new airport
when relocation funding and all permits are in place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, the Army Corps of Engineers issued a Regional General
Permit which enables us to implement large-scale environmental
and development planning for 48,150 acres in Walton and Bay
Counties. The National Resources Defense Council and The Florida
Sierra Club filed a lawsuit against the Army Corps of Engineers
challenging the Regional General Permit in April 2005. At that
time, a federal district court issued a preliminary injunction
halting development under the permit. In November 2006, the
court upheld the permit and lifted the injunction, allowing
development to proceed. The plaintiffs have appealed the ruling.
This legal action has had a minimal effect to date on our real
estate development activity.
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, we announced that we are exiting the
homebuilding business in Florida to further focus on our core
competencies of land planning and development. We believe that
our value creation potential is highest when we use our unique
strengths to create inspirational places with value, personality
and purpose. We expect that our exit from Florida homebuilding
will be completed by mid-2008. The homebuilding exit was made
possible by our expanding relationships with national, regional
and local homebuilders and their growing interest in the
Northwest Florida real estate markets. For example, from April
through December 2006, we committed 1,209 lots to two national
homebuilders, Beazer Homes and David Weekley Homes. Of these
committed units, 426 had been closed as of December 31,
2006. See the table entitled Residential Real Estate
National Homebuilder Summary of Home Site Commitments and
Purchases within our Residential Real Estate Segment
section for more information.
|
|
|
|
In August 2006 and January 2007, we implemented a series of
operational changes designed to streamline and organize our
field operations along regional lines and to advance our rural
land sales strategies. These changes were designed to capture
operating efficiencies and to promote the coordinated
development of groups of projects that integrate various real
estate product types. These organizational changes, together
with normal employee attrition, have resulted in a workforce
reduction of approximately 24% of our full-time employees from
the beginning of 2006.
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter, JOE closed a transaction with the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) for the sale of
approximately 4,000 acres in Northwest Florida to be used for
rights-of-way
for future road and highway construction in the region. We
received $46.0 million in cash from this transaction, but,
more importantly, the transaction demonstrates our commitment to
innovative infrastructure planning and development in Northwest
Florida. Accounting gain will be recognized over time as the
FDOT completes the design and engineering of individual roadway
segments and the land is conveyed to the FDOT, a process that is
likely to take many years to complete.
|
|
|
|
Another infrastructure milestone during 2006 was the opening of
the realigned portion of Highway 98 at our WindMark Beach
community. This represents the culmination of years of effort to
potentially create additional value at WindMark Beach by moving
3.6 miles of Highway 98 away from the beachfront area of
the development. We next plan to restore the existing dune
structure and use the roadbed of the original highway to create
one of the longest public beachfront trail systems in Florida.
|
|
|
|
In May 2006, we announced an updated analysis of our land
holdings which showed an increase of 46% in total acreage
classified for resort, seasonal and primary residential uses.
The land analysis also indicated that approximately
200,000 acres previously classified as timberland are now
planned for other higher uses. We believe that land
classification and analysis is the important first step in our
value creation strategy.
|
|
|
|
Our WaterColor Inn and Resort received national honors and
recognition during 2006. Among its notable awards were the
following: ranked as the
36th best
hotel in the world and
7th in
North America by readers of Travel + Leisure magazine; ranked as
the #1 family hotel in North America by readers of Travel +
Leisure Family magazine; designated as an Andrew Harpers
Hideaway Report Grand Award
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Winner; honored by AAA with Northwest Floridas only
four-diamond ranking; and named to ForbesTraveler.coms
list of the 400 best hotels in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2007, we entered into an exclusive listing agreement
with Eastdil Secured, LLC, a real estate brokerage firm, for the
marketing and potential disposition of our office building
portfolio. The portfolio is located in seven markets throughout
the Southeast and consists of 17 buildings with approximately
2.3 million net rentable square feet. The likelihood and
timing of the possible sale will depend upon market reaction and
other variables.
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, we increased the size of our revolving credit
facility from $250 million to $500 million.
|
Land-Use
Entitlements
We have a broad range of land-use entitlements in hand or in
various stages of the approval process for residential
communities in Northwest Florida and other high-growth regions
of the state, as well as commercial entitlements. As of
December 31, 2006, we had approximately 44,300 units
and 14.5 million commercial square feet in the entitlements
pipeline, in addition to 627 acres zoned for commercial
uses. The following tables describe our residential and
commercial projects with land-use entitlements that are in
development, pre-development planning or the entitlements
process. These entitlements are on approximately
58,000 acres. Most of the projects are on lands we own and
some of the projects are being developed through ventures with
unrelated third parties.
Summary
of Land-Use Entitlements(1)
Active JOE Residential and Mixed-Use Projects in Florida
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Entitlements
|
|
Project
|
|
Class.(2)
|
|
|
County
|
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Units(3)
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
12/31/06(4)
|
|
|
Remaining(4)
|
|
|
(Sq. Ft.)(5)
|
|
|
In
Development:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artisan Park(7)
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Osceola
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cutter Ridge
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawks Landing
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landings at Wetappo
|
|
|
RR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palmetto Trace
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paseos(7)
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Palm Beach
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
RiverCamps on Crooked Creek
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rivercrest(7)
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Hillsborough
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
RiverSide at Chipola
|
|
|
RR
|
|
|
|
Calhoun
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
RiverTown
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
St. Johns
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
SevenShores
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Manatee
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
SouthWood
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Leon
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
4,715,360
|
|
St. Johns Golf & Country
Club
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
St. Johns
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
SummerCamp
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
The Hammocks
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victoria Park
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Volusia
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
854,254
|
|
WaterColor
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
47,600
|
|
WaterSound
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
457,380
|
|
WaterSound Beach
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
WaterSound West Beach
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
WindMark Beach
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,354
|
|
|
|
24,294
|
|
|
|
9,093
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
15,125
|
|
|
|
6,712,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Under
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Entitlements
|
|
Project
|
|
Class.(2)
|
|
|
County
|
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Units(3)
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
12/31/06(4)
|
|
|
Remaining(4)
|
|
|
(Sq. Ft.)(5)
|
|
|
In
Pre-Development:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avenue A
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayview Estates
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayview Multifamily
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beckrich NE
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boggy Creek
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonfire Beach
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
College Station
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Lake Creek
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Lake Powell
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Hills Road
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howards Creek
|
|
|
RR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laguna Beach West
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Avenue
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palmetto Bayou
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
ParkSide
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pier Park NE
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
Pier Park Timeshare
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
PineWood (Park Place)
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port St. Joe Town Center (Port St.
Joe Mill Site Area)
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Powell Adams
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
RiverCamps on Sandy Creek
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sabal Island
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Cove
|
|
|
RR
|
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timber Island(8)
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
Topsail
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Wavecrest
|
|
|
RS
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
WestBay Corners SE
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
WestBay Corners SW
|
|
|
PR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
WestBay DSAP
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
15,089
|
|
|
|
5,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,842
|
|
|
|
4,330,000
|
|
WestBay Landing
|
|
|
VAR
|
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
WhiteFence Farms, Red Hills
|
|
|
RR
|
|
|
|
Leon
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,043
|
|
|
|
16,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,309
|
|
|
|
5,574,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,397
|
|
|
|
40,603
|
|
|
|
9,093
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
31,434
|
|
|
|
12,287,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A project is deemed land-use
entitled when all major discretionary governmental land-use
approvals have been received. Some of these projects may require
additional permits for development
and/or
build-out; they also may be subject to legal challenge.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Current JOE land classifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Primary residential.
|
|
|
|
RS Resort and seasonal residential, which includes
RiverCamps.
|
|
|
|
RR Rural residential, which includes WhiteFence
Farms, Homesteads and other rural residential products.
|
|
|
|
VAR Includes multiple classifications. For example,
a project may have substantial commercial and residential acres.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Project units represent the maximum
number of units entitled or currently expected at full
build-out. The actual number of units or square feet to be
constructed at full build-out may be lower than the number
entitled or currently expected.
|
5
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Excludes our Mid-Atlantic region
that includes activity in North and South Carolina where we are
primarily engaged in homebuilding, and not obtaining
entitlements. As of December 31, 2006, the Mid-Atlantic
region had 1,492 home sites owned or under contract. Of that
total, 191 have been sold and 1,301 remain to be sold.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents the remaining square
feet with land-use entitlements as designated in a development
order or expected given the existing property land use or zoning
and present plans. Commercial entitlements include retail,
office and industrial uses. Industrial uses total
6,128,381 square feet including SouthWood, RiverTown and
the West Bay DSAP.
|
|
(6)
|
|
A project is in
development when construction on the project has
commenced. A project in pre-development has land-use
entitlements but is still under internal evaluation or requires
one or more additional permits prior to the commencement of
construction.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Artisan Park is 74 percent
owned by JOE. Paseos and Rivercrest are each 50 percent
owned by JOE.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Timber Island entitlements include
seven residential units and 400 units for hotel or other
transient uses (including units held with fractional ownership
such as private residence clubs) and include 480 wet/dry marina
slips.
|
Proposed
JOE Residential and Mixed-Use Projects
In the Land-Use Entitlement Process in Florida(1)
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Entitlements
|
|
Project
|
|
Class.(2)
|
|
County
|
|
Project Acres
|
|
|
Project Units(3)
|
|
|
(Sq. Ft.)(3)
|
|
|
Beacon Hill
|
|
RR
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrabelle East
|
|
PR
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country Walk
|
|
RR
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeerPoint Cedar Grove
|
|
PR
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panama City Mixed Use
|
|
VAR
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
635,000
|
|
Port St. Joe Draper, Phase I
|
|
PR
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
SouthSide
|
|
VAR
|
|
Leon
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
1,150,000
|
|
South Walton Multifamily
|
|
PR
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
Star Avenue North
|
|
VAR
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
St. James Island McIntyre
|
|
RR
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. James Island RiverCamps
|
|
RS
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. James Island Granite Point
|
|
RS
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Cove, Phase 3
|
|
RR
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
|
12,913
|
|
|
|
2,165,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A project is deemed to be in the
land-use entitlement process when customary steps necessary for
the preparation and submittal of an application, such as
conducting pre-application meetings or similar discussions with
governmental officials, have commenced
and/or an
application has been filed. All projects listed have significant
entitlement steps remaining that could affect their timing,
scale and viability. There can be no assurance that these
entitlements will ultimately be received.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Current JOE land classifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Primary residential.
|
|
|
|
RS Resort and seasonal residential, which includes
RiverCamps.
|
|
|
|
RR Rural residential, which includes WhiteFence
Farms, Homesteads and other rural residential products.
|
|
|
|
VAR Includes multiple classifications. For example,
a project may have substantial commercial and residential acres.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The actual number of units or
square feet to be constructed at full build-out may be lower
than the number ultimately entitled.
|
6
Summary
of Additional Commercial Land-Use Entitlements (1)
(Commercial Projects Not Included in the Tables Above)
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
Acres Sold
|
|
|
Acres Under Contract
|
|
|
Total Acres
|
|
Project
|
|
County
|
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Since Inception
|
|
|
As of
12/31/06
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Airport Commerce
|
|
|
Leon
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Airport Road
|
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Alf Coleman Retail
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Avery St. Retail
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beach Commerce
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Beach Commerce II
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Beckrich Office Park
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Beckrich Retail
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Cedar Grove Commerce
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Franklin Industrial
|
|
|
Franklin
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Glades Retail
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Gulf Boulevard
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Hammock Creek Commerce
|
|
|
Gadsden
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Mill Creek Commerce
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Nautilus Court
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Port St. Joe Commerce II
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Port St. Joe Commerce III
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Port St. Joe Medical
|
|
|
Gulf
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Powell Hills Retail
|
|
|
Bay
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Walton Commerce
|
|
|
Walton
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A project is deemed land-use
entitled when all major discretionary governmental land-use
approvals have been received. Some of these projects may require
additional permits for development
and/or
build-out; they also may be subject to legal challenge. Includes
significant JOE projects that are either operating, under
development or in the pre-development stage.
|
Residential
Real Estate
Our residential real estate segment develops large-scale,
mixed-use resort, seasonal and primary residential communities
primarily on land we own with very low cost basis. We own large
tracts of land in Northwest Florida, including large tracts near
Tallahassee and Panama City, and significant Gulf of Mexico
beach frontage and other waterfront properties, which we believe
are suited for resort, seasonal and primary communities. We
believe this large land inventory, with a low cost basis,
provides us an advantage over our competitors who must purchase
real estate at current market prices before beginning projects.
We manage the conceptual design, planning and permitting process
for each of our new communities. We then contract for the
construction of the infrastructure for the community. Developed
home sites are then marketed and sold to individual purchasers
or to homebuilders.
JOE also owns all of the outstanding stock of Saussy Burbank, a
homebuilder located in Charlotte, North Carolina. In 2006,
Saussy Burbank closed sales of 637 homes it constructed in North
and South Carolina.
The following is a description of some of the communities we are
developing:
WaterColor is situated on approximately 499 acres on the
beaches of the Gulf of Mexico in south Walton County. The
community is planned to include approximately 1,140 units,
including an 11 - unit private residence club with
fractional ownership. WaterColor includes the WaterColor Inn and
Resort, the recipient of
7
many notable awards during 2006. Other amenities include a beach
club, spa, tennis center, an award-winning upscale restaurant,
retail and commercial space and neighborhood parks.
WaterSound Beach is located approximately five miles east of
WaterColor. Situated on approximately 256 acres, WaterSound
Beach includes over one mile of beachfront on the Gulf of
Mexico. This community is currently planned to include
approximately 511 units. During 2006, the WaterSound
Private Beach Club opened for business and began accepting
memberships.
WaterSound West Beach is located over one half mile west of
WaterSound Beach on the beach side of County Road 30A. This
community has been designed for 199 units with private
beach access through the adjacent Deer Lake State Park.
WaterSound, located on approximately 2,425 acres and
planned for a
1,432-unit
mixed-use development, is a resort community approximately three
miles from WaterSound Beach north of U.S. 98 in Walton
County. WaterSound will include approximately
450,000 square feet of commercial space. This seasonal town
is planned to include a golf course, pools, parks and other
amenities. Sales at WaterSound began in 2006.
Palmetto Trace is a primary home community in Panama City Beach
planned for 481 units on 141 acres. From its inception
through December 31, 2006, contracts for 460 units
were accepted and closed. David Weekley Homes, LLP, a national
homebuilder, is building out the last phase of Palmetto Trace.
RiverCamps on Crooked Creek, situated on approximately
1,491 acres in western Bay County and bounded by West Bay,
the Intracoastal Waterway and Crooked Creek, is planned for 408
high-quality finished cabins in a low-density, rustic setting
with access to various outdoor activities such as fishing,
boating and hiking. In 2006, we substantially completed the
River House, an amenity designed to provide RiverCamps owners
with a waterfront recreational facility.
Hawks Landing is a primary home community on approximately
88 acres located in Lynn Haven in Bay County. We plan to
develop 168 home sites at Hawks Landing to local and national
home builders. From its inception through December 31,
2006, contracts for 61 units were accepted or closed.
WindMark Beach is situated on approximately 2,020 acres in
Gulf County near the town of Port St. Joe and includes
approximately 15,000 feet of beachfront. This beachfront
resort destination is planned to include approximately
1,662 units at full build-out, together with
75,000 square feet of commercial space. Construction to
realign approximately four miles of U.S. Highway 98 away
from the beachfront was completed in 2006. Sales in the second
phase of WindMark Beach began in 2006.
SummerCamp, in Franklin County, is situated on the Gulf of
Mexico on approximately 762 acres. Plans include
approximately 499 units, a beach club, a community dock and
nature trails.
SouthWood is situated on approximately 3,370 acres in
southeast Tallahassee. Planned to include approximately 4,770
residential units, SouthWood includes an 18-hole golf course and
club, and a traditional town center with restaurants,
recreational facilities, retail shops and offices. Over 35% of
the land in this community is designated for greenspaces,
including a
123-acre
central park. We own significant commercial acreage adjacent to
SouthWood. In late 2006, we closed a commercial transaction with
a shopping center developer that plans to build a
430,000 square foot retail center adjacent to SouthWood.
WhiteFence Farms, Red Hills is being designed with 61 rural home
sites on approximately 373 acres near Tallahassee. This
community will allow owners to enjoy an active or passive
outdoors and farm-oriented lifestyle with modern conveniences
and proximity to an urban center. The home sites will range in
size from three to 15 acres and will feature cleared
acreage, fencing, trails and entry features.
RiverTown is situated on approximately 4,170 acres located
in St. Johns County south of Jacksonville along the St. Johns
River. With parks and public meeting places, RiverTown is being
planned for 4,500 housing units and 500,000 square feet of
commercial space. RiverTown will have seven unique neighborhoods
interwoven with community and retail areas by a series of bike
paths and walkways, with all roads leading to the
communitys centerpiece, the St. Johns River.
RiverTown will offer homebuyers a wide variety of price
8
points and lifestyles, appealing to several different target
markets, including primary and second-home buyers. Construction
at RiverTown started in 2006 and sales are expected to begin in
2007.
St. Johns Golf and Country Club is a primary residential
community situated on approximately 880 acres we acquired
in St. Johns County in 2001. The community includes an 18-hole
golf course and club house facility. Of the 799 units
planned, 790 had been sold or were under contract at the end of
2006.
Victoria Park is situated on approximately 1,859 acres in
Volusia County near Interstate 4 in the historic college town of
Deland between Daytona Beach and Orlando. Plans for Victoria
Park include approximately 4,200 single and multi-family units
built among parks, lakes and conservation areas. Victoria Park
includes an award-winning 18-hole golf course.
Artisan Park, located in Celebration, near Orlando, is being
developed through a joint venture in which we own 74%. Artisan
Park is situated on approximately 175 acres which we
acquired in 2002. Artisan Park is planned to include
approximately 267 single-family units, 47 townhomes, and 302
condominiums as well as parks, trails and a community clubhouse
with a pool and educational and recreational programming. At the
end of 2006, 89 units remained for sale at Artisan Park.
Infrastructure construction has started on SevenShores, located
in the City of Bradenton in Manatee County. SevenShores is
entitled for 686 condominium units on 192 acres, with a
club house, related amenities, and access to a marina. Vertical
construction will not commence at SevenShores until internally
set presale requirements are satisfied.
Several of our planned developments are in the midst of the
entitlement process or are in the planning stage. We cannot
assure you that:
|
|
|
|
|
the necessary entitlements for development will be secured;
|
|
|
|
any of our projects can be successfully developed, if at
all; or
|
|
|
|
our projects can be developed in a timely manner.
|
It is not feasible to estimate project development costs until
entitlements have been obtained. Large-scale development
projects can require significant infrastructure development
costs and may raise environmental issues that require mitigation.
Commercial
Real Estate
Our commercial real estate segment develops and sells real
estate for commercial purposes. We also own a portfolio of
office properties located throughout the southeastern United
States.
Development and Sales. We focus on commercial
development in Northwest Florida because of our large land
holdings along roadways and near or within business districts in
the region. We also develop parcels within or near existing
residential development projects. For each new development, we
direct the conceptual design, planning and permitting process
and then contract for the construction of the horizontal
infrastructure and any vertical building.
We focus on developing and selling the following products:
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties
|
|
|
|
Multi-family parcels
|
|
|
|
Office parks
|
|
|
|
Commerce parks
|
Investment Property Portfolio. Our commercial
development operations, combined with our tax deferral strategy
of reinvesting qualifying asset sale proceeds into like-kind
properties, have enabled us to create a portfolio of 17 office
buildings totaling 2.3 million square feet. Our portfolio
of investment properties was 85% leased, based on net rentable
square feet, as of December 31, 2006. In January 2007, we
engaged a real
9
estate brokerage firm to market the office building portfolio
for sale. The likelihood and timing of a possible transaction is
subject to market reaction and other variables.
Rural
Land Sales
Our rural land sales segment markets parcels for a variety of
rural residential and recreational uses on a portion of our
long-held timberlands in Northwest Florida. The pricing of these
parcels varies significantly based on size, location, terrain,
timber quality and other local factors. Some parcels include the
benefits of limited development activity including improved
roads, ponds, fencing, gates and common use areas. In 2006, this
segment sold 34,335 acres of rural land at an average price of
$2,621 per acre.
The vast majority of the holdings marketed by our rural land
sales segment will continue to be managed as timberland until
sold. The revenues and income from our timberland operations are
reflected in the results of our forestry segment.
Forestry
Our forestry segment focuses on the management and harvesting of
our extensive timber holdings. We grow, harvest and sell timber
and wood fiber. Our principal forestry product is softwood
pulpwood. We also grow and sell softwood and hardwood sawtimber.
In addition, we own and operate a cypress sawmill and mulch
plant, Sunshine State Cypress, which converts cypress logs into
wood products and mulch.
On December 31, 2006, our standing pine inventory totaled
approximately 23.9 million tons and our hardwood inventory
totaled approximately 8.7 million tons. Our timberlands are
harvested by local independent contractors under agreements that
are generally renewed annually. Our timberlands are located near
key transportation links, including roads, waterways and
railroads.
Our strategy is to actively manage, with the best available
silviculture practices, portions of our timberlands that produce
adequate amounts of timber to meet our pulpwood supply agreement
obligation with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, which
expires June 30, 2012. We also harvest and sell additional
timber to regional sawmills that produce products other than
pulpwood. In addition, our forestry operation is focused on
selective harvesting, thinning and site preparation of
timberlands that may later be sold or developed by other JOE
divisions.
Competition
The real estate development business is highly competitive and
fragmented. We compete with numerous developers of varying
sizes, ranging from local to regional in scope, some of which
have greater financial resources than we have. Sales of existing
homes and home sites also provide competition for homesite
purchases in our new residential developments. In our
residential real estate segment, we compete primarily on the
basis of community design, quality, uniqueness, amenities and
developer reputation. We believe that our financial stability,
relative to most others in our industry, has also become an
increasingly favorable competitive factor.
Supplemental
Information
Information regarding the revenues, earnings and total assets of
each of our operating segments can be found in Note 14 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Subtantially all of our revenues are generated from domestic
customers. All of our assets are located in the United States.
Employees
During 2006 and early 2007, we streamlined our operations and
reduced employee headcount in connection with a series of
organizational changes. As of February 1, 2007, we had
938 full-time employees
10
and 145 part-time employees. This represents an
approximately 24% reduction in the number of full-time employees
from the beginning of 2006. Our employees work in the following
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full-Time
|
|
|
Part-Time
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Residential real estate development
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
Residential clubs and resorts
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other including
corporate
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Website
Access to Reports
We will make available, free of charge, access to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC, through our internet home page at
www.JOE.com.
Certifications
In 2006, we submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the
Certification of our Chief Executive Officer required by
Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual,
relating to our compliance with the NYSEs corporate
governance lising standards. There were no qualifications to the
certification. We have also filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2
to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
certifications required to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Our business faces numerous risks, including those set forth
below. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develop
into actual events, our business, financial condition or results
of operations could be materially adversely affected. The risks
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial
may also impair our business operations.
A
downturn in national or regional economic conditions, especially
in Florida, could adversely impact our business.
Our real estate sales, revenues, financial condition and results
of operations could decline due to a deterioration of the
national or certain regional economies. Our sales and revenues
would be especially affected by a downturn in economic
conditions in Florida, where most of our developments are
located. In addition, we generate a disproportionate amount of
our resort and seasonal sales in our Northwest Florida
communities from customers in the Southeast region of the United
States, which sales would be impacted by a deterioration of
economic conditions in that region. In addition, a significant
percentage of our planned residential units are resort and
seasonal products, purchases of which are particularly sensitive
to the state of the economy.
A
continued downturn in the demand for real estate, especially
residential real estate products, could adversely impact our
business.
The majority of our revenues are generated from the sale of
residential real estate products. Our ability to generate
revenues in our residential real estate segment is directly
related to demand for these products. As described above, a
deterioration of economic conditions, whether national or
regional, can adversely affect demand for real estate. The real
estate industry, however, is cyclical and can experience
downturns based on
11
consumer perceptions of real estate markets and other cyclical
factors wholly unrelated to general economic conditions. Since
late 2005, the United States, and Florida in particular, has
experienced a significant downturn in certain residential real
estate markets while economic conditions have generally remained
healthy. As investors who have increasingly utilized real estate
as an investment over the last several years seek to liquidate
their real estate investments, resale inventories of existing
homes and lots have risen dramatically, especially in our resort
markets. If these trends continue, the demand for our
residential real estate products could further decline,
negatively impacting our net income and potentially further
impacting selling prices
and/or
absorption rates.
The
occurrence of hurricanes and other natural disasters in Florida
could adversely affect our business.
Because of its location between the Gulf of Mexico and the
Atlantic Ocean, Florida is particularly susceptible to the
occurrence of hurricanes. Depending on where any particular
hurricane makes landfall, our developments in Florida,
especially our coastal properties in Northwest Florida, could
experience significant, if not catastrophic, damage. Such damage
could materially delay sales in affected communities or could
lessen demand for products in those communities. Importantly,
regardless of actual destruction in a development, the
occurrence of hurricanes in Florida and the southeastern United
States could negatively impact demand for our real estate
products because of consumer perceptions of hurricane risks. For
example, the southeastern United States experienced a
record-setting hurricane season in 2005. In particular,
Hurricane Katrina, which struck New Orleans and the Mississippi
Gulf Coast, caused severe devastation to those areas and
received prolonged national media attention. Although our
properties were not significantly impacted, we believe that the
2005 hurricane season had an immediate negative impact on sales
of our resort residential products. Another severe hurricane or
hurricane season in the future could have a similar negative
effect on our real estate sales.
In addition to hurricanes, the occurrence of other natural
disasters in Florida, such as tornadoes, floods, fires,
unusually heavy or prolonged rain and droughts, could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to develop and sell
properties or realize income from our projects. The occurrence
of natural disasters could also have a long-term negative effect
on the attractiveness of Florida as a location for resort,
seasonal
and/or
primary residences.
Increases
in real estate property taxes
and/or
insurance premiums could reduce customer demand for lots and
homes in our developments.
Property insurance companies doing business in Florida have
reacted to recent hurricanes by increasing premiums, requiring
higher deductibles, reducing limits, restricting coverages,
imposing exclusions, refusing to insure certain property owners,
and in some instances, ceasing insurance operations in the
state. These actions have been most dramatically applied to
coastal communities. A significant number of our developments
are located in such coastal communities. This trend of rising
insurance rates could continue if there are severe hurricanes in
the future.
Florida has recently experienced dramatic increases in property
values due to the record-setting real estate activity in the
first half of this decade. As a result, local governments have
been, and may continue, aggressively re-assessing the value of
homes and real estate for property tax purposes. These larger
assessments increase the total real estate property taxes due
from property owners annually.
Increases in real estate insurance premiums
and/or
property taxes could influence potential customers who may
consider those annual costs in making housing choices to decide
not to purchase a lot or home in one of our developments, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Our
business is concentrated in Florida, primarily Northwest
Florida. As a result, our financial results are dependent on the
economic growth and health of Florida, particularly Northwest
Florida.
The economic growth and health of Florida, particularly
Northwest Florida where the majority of our land is located, are
important factors in sustaining demand for our products and
services. As a result, any adverse
12
change to the economic growth and health of Florida,
particularly Northwest Florida, could materially adversely
affect our financial results. The future economic growth in
certain portions of Northwest Florida may be adversely affected
if its infrastructure, such as roads, airports, medical
facilities and schools, are not improved to meet increased
demand. There can be no assurance that these improvements will
occur.
The most significant infrastructure improvement currently being
considered in Northwest Florida is the proposed relocation of
the Panama City-Bay County International Airport to a site in
western Bay County located on land that we own. In September
2006, the Federal Aviation Administration issued its Record of
Decision approving the relocation of the airport to the West Bay
site. An appeal of the Record of Decision has been filed by the
Natural Resources Defense Council and other petitioners. The
Airport Authority has received all state permits necessary to
move forward with the relocation of the airport, but the Army
Corps of Engineers must issue a Section 404 permit before
construction can commence. The relocation of the airport is also
dependent on adequate funding. We have agreed to donate
4,000 acres to the Airport Authority when relocation
funding and all permits are in place. We believe that the
relocation of the airport is important to the overall economic
development of Northwest Florida. If the relocation of the
airport does not occur, our business prospects could be
materially affected.
Changes
in the demographics affecting projected population growth in
Florida, particularly Northwest Florida, including a decrease in
the migration of Baby Boomers, could adversely affect our
business.
Florida has experienced strong recent population growth,
including the migration of Baby Boomers to the state. We believe
that Baby Boomers seeking retirement or vacation homes in
Florida will be important target customers for our real estate
products in the future, and we intend to continue to plan and
market products to them. In addition, the success of our primary
communities will be dependent on strong in-migration population
expansion in our regions of development, primarily Northwest
Florida. If persons considering moving to Florida do not view
Northwest Florida as an attractive primary, second home or
retirement destination, our business could be adversely affected.
Floridas population growth is expected to continue into
the foreseeable future, although population growth in 2007 is
expected to be less than the growth experienced in 2006.
Floridas population growth could be negatively affected in
the future by factors such as the occurrence of hurricanes, the
high cost of real estate and increasing insurance costs. In
addition, other states such as Georgia, North and South Carolina
and Tennessee have implemented marketing initiatives designed to
attract retiring Baby Boomers and the workforce population who
may have otherwise considered moving to Florida. Any significant
decrease in the demographic trend of increasing population in
Florida, including the migration of Baby Boomers, could
adversely affect our business.
Increases
in interest rates could reduce demand for our
products.
Many purchasers of our real estate products obtain mortgage
loans to finance a substantial portion of the purchase price,
including the construction price of a home that may be
constructed on the property. Further, our homebuilder customers
depend on purchasers who rely on mortgage financing. In general,
housing demand is adversely affected by increases in interest
rates and by decreases in the availability of mortgage
financing. In addition, changes in the federal income tax laws
which would remove or limit the deduction for home mortgage
interest could have an adverse impact on demand for our
residential products. In addition to residential real estate,
increased interest rates could also negatively impact our
commercial properties or other land we develop or sell. If
interest rates increase and the ability or willingness of
prospective buyers to finance real estate purchases is adversely
affected, our sales, revenues, financial condition and results
of operations may be negatively affected.
Our
real estate operations are cyclical.
Our business is affected by demographic and economic trends and
the supply and rate of absorption of lot sales and new
construction. As a result, our real estate operations are
cyclical, which may cause our quarterly revenues and operating
results to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and
to differ from the
13
expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this
occurs, our stocks trading price could also fluctuate
significantly.
We are
exposed to risks associated with real estate sales and
development.
Our real estate development activities entail risks that include:
|
|
|
|
|
construction delays or cost overruns, which may increase project
development costs;
|
|
|
|
compliance with building codes and other local regulations;
|
|
|
|
an inability to obtain required governmental permits and
authorizations;
|
|
|
|
an inability to secure tenants or anchors necessary to support
commercial projects; and
|
|
|
|
failure to achieve anticipated occupancy levels or rents.
|
If we
are not able to raise sufficient cash to enhance and maintain
our operations and to develop our real estate holdings, our
revenues, financial condition and results of operations could be
negatively impacted.
We operate in a capital intensive industry and require
significant capital expenditures to maintain our competitive
position. We obtain funds for our capital expenditures through
cash flow from operations, property sales and financings.
Failure to secure needed additional financing, if and when
needed, may limit our development activities which could reduce
our revenues and results of operations. We expect to make
significant capital expenditures in the future to enhance and
maintain the operations of our properties and to develop our
real estate holdings. In the event that our plans or assumptions
change or prove to be inaccurate, or if our cash flow proves to
be insufficient, due to unanticipated expenses or otherwise, we
may seek to minimize cash expenditures
and/or
obtain additional financing in order to support our plan of
operations. Additional funding, whether obtained through public
or private debt or equity financing, or from strategic
alliances, may not be available when needed or may not be
available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
We rely on a senior revolving credit facility with adjustable
interest rates to provide cash for operations
and/or
capital expenditures. Increases in interest rates can make it
more expensive for us to obtain the funds we need to operate our
business.
Our credit facility, as well as our outstanding senior notes,
contain financial covenants that we must meet on a quarterly
basis. These restrictive covenants require, among other things,
that we generate cash in excess of our fixed charges and that we
not exceed certain debt levels. If we are not able to generate
sufficient cash from operations to satisfy these covenants, we
could have an event of default under our credit facility, senior
notes and certain other debt. Such a default could cause these
lenders to immediately accelerate amounts due under our credit
facility, senior notes and certain other debt. They could also
seek to negotiate additional or more severe restrictive
covenants or increased pricing. Any of these events could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Our
business is subject to extensive regulation which makes it
difficult and expensive for us to conduct our
operations.
Development
of real estate entails a lengthy, uncertain and costly
entitlements process.
Approval to develop real property in Florida entails an
extensive entitlements process involving multiple and
overlapping regulatory jurisdictions and often requiring
discretionary action by local government. This process is often
political, uncertain and may require significant exactions in
order to secure approvals. Real estate projects must generally
comply with the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (the
Growth Management Act) and local land development
regulations. In addition, development projects that exceed
certain specified regulatory thresholds require approval of a
comprehensive Development of Regional Impact, or DRI,
application. Compliance with the Growth Management Act, local
land development regulations and the DRI process is usually
lengthy and costly and can be expected to materially affect our
real estate development activities.
14
The Growth Management Act requires local governments to adopt
comprehensive plans guiding and controlling future real property
development in their respective jurisdictions and to evaluate,
assess and keep those plans current. Included in all
comprehensive plans is a future land use map which sets forth
allowable land use development rights. Since most of our land
has an agricultural land use, we are required to
seek an amendment to the future land use map to develop
residential, commercial and mixed use projects. Approval of
these comprehensive plan map amendments is highly discretionary.
All development orders and development permits must be
consistent with the plan. Each plan must address such topics as
future land use and capital improvements and make adequate
provision for a multitude of public services including
transportation, schools, solid waste disposal, sanitation,
sewerage, potable water supply, drainage, affordable housing,
open space and parks. The local governments comprehensive
plans must also establish levels of service with
respect to certain specified public facilities, including roads
and schools, and services to residents. In many areas,
infrastructure funding has not kept pace with growth, causing
facilities to operate below established levels of service. Local
governments are prohibited from issuing development orders or
permits if the development will reduce the level of service for
public facilities below the level of service established in the
local governments comprehensive plan, unless the developer
either sufficiently improves the services up front to meet the
required level or provides financial assurances that the
additional services will be provided as the project progresses.
In addition, local governments that fail to keep their plans
current may be prohibited by law from amending their plans to
allow for new development.
The DRI review process includes an evaluation of a
projects impact on the environment, infrastructure and
government services, and requires the involvement of numerous
state and local environmental, zoning and community development
agencies. Local government approval of any DRI is subject to
appeal to the Governor and Cabinet by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs, and adverse decisions by the Governor or
Cabinet are subject to judicial appeal. The DRI approval process
is usually lengthy and costly, and conditions, standards or
requirements may be imposed on a developer with respect to a
particular project, which may materially increase the cost of
the project.
Changes in the Growth Management Act or the DRI review process
or the interpretation thereof, new enforcement of these laws,
the enactment of new laws regarding the development of real
property or the identification of new facts could lead to new or
greater liabilities that could materially adversely affect our
business, profitability or financial condition.
Environmental
and other regulations may have an adverse effect on our
business.
Our properties are subject to federal, state and local
environmental regulations and restrictions that may impose
significant limitations on our development ability. In most
cases, approval to develop requires multiple permits which
involve a long, uncertain and costly regulatory process. Most of
our land holdings contain jurisdictional wetlands, some of which
may be unsuitable for development or prohibited from development
by law. Development approval most often requires mitigation for
impacts that require land to be conserved at a disproportionate
ratio versus the land approved for development. Much of our
property is undeveloped land located in areas where development
may have to avoid, minimize or mitigate for impacts to the
natural habitats of various protected wildlife or plant species.
Much of our property is in coastal areas that usually have a
more restrictive permitting burden and must address issues such
as coastal high hazard, hurricane evacuation, floodplains and
dune protection.
In addition, our current or past ownership, operation and
leasing of real property, and our current or past transportation
and other operations are subject to extensive and evolving
federal, state and local environmental laws and other
regulations. The provisions and enforcement of these
environmental laws and regulations may become more stringent in
the future. Violations of these laws and regulations can result
in:
civil penalties;
remediation expenses;
natural resource damages;
15
personal injury damages;
potential injunctions;
cease and desist orders; and
criminal penalties.
In addition, some of these environmental laws impose strict
liability, which means that we may be held liable for any
environmental damages on our property regardless of fault.
Some of our past and present real property, particularly
properties used in connection with our previous transportation
and papermill operations, were involved in the storage, use or
disposal of hazardous substances that have contaminated and may
in the future contaminate the environment. We may bear liability
for this contamination and for the costs of cleaning up a site
at which we have disposed of or to which we have transported
hazardous substances. The presence of hazardous substances on a
property may also adversely affect our ability to sell or
develop the property or to borrow funds using the property as
collateral.
Changes in laws or the interpretation thereof, new enforcement
of laws, the identification of new facts or the failure of other
parties to perform remediation at our current or former
facilities could lead to new or greater liabilities that could
materially adversely affect our business, profitability or
financial condition.
We are
increasingly dependent upon national, regional and local
homebuilders, as well as other strategic partners, who may have
interests that differ from ours and may take actions that
adversely affect us.
With our exit from the homebuilding business in Florida, we are
now highly dependent upon our relationships with national,
regional and local homebuilders to provide construction services
at our residential developments. If homebuilders do not view our
developments as desirable locations for homebuilding operations,
our business will be adversely affected.
We may also be involved in other strategic alliances or joint
venture relationships as part of our overall strategy for
particular developments or regions. These joint venture partners
may bring development experience, industry expertise, financing
capabilities, brand recognition and credibility or other
competitive assets. Strategic partners, however, may have
economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent
with ours or that are influenced by factors unrelated to our
business. For example, a national homebuilder could decide to
delay purchases of lots in one of our developments due to
adverse real estate conditions in its areas of operations wholly
unrelated to our region. We may also be subject to adverse
business consequences if the market reputation of a strategic
partner deteriorates.
A formal partnership with a joint venture partner may also
involve special risks such as:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not have voting control over the joint venture;
|
|
|
|
the venture partner may take actions contrary to our
instructions or requests, or contrary to our policies or
objectives with respect to the real estate investments;
|
|
|
|
the venture partner could experience financial
difficulties; and
|
|
|
|
actions by a venture partner may subject property owned by the
joint venture to liabilities greater than those contemplated by
the joint venture agreement or have other adverse consequences.
|
Changes
in our income tax estimates could affect our
profitability.
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant
management judgment is required to estimate our income taxes.
Our estimates are based on our interpretation of federal and
state tax laws. We estimate our actual current tax due and
assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment
of items for tax and accounting purposes. The temporary
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which
are included in our consolidated balance sheet. Adjustments may
be required by a change in assessment of our deferred tax assets
and liabilities, changes due to audit adjustments by federal and
state tax authorities, and changes in tax laws. To the extent
adjustments are required in any given period, we will include
the
16
adjustments in the tax provision in our financial statements.
These adjustments could materially impact our financial
position, cash flow and results of operations.
Significant
competition could have an adverse effect on our
business.
The real
estate industry is generally characterized by significant
competition.
A number of residential and commercial developers, some with
greater financial and other resources, compete with us in
seeking resources for development and prospective purchasers and
tenants. Competition from other real estate developers and real
estate services companies may adversely affect our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
sell homes and home sites;
|
|
|
|
attract purchasers;
|
|
|
|
attract and retain tenants;
|
|
|
|
sell undeveloped rural land;
|
|
|
|
attract and retain experienced real estate development
personnel; and
|
|
|
|
obtain construction materials and labor.
|
The
forest products industry is highly competitive.
Many of our competitors in the forest products industry are
fully integrated companies with substantially greater financial
and operating resources. Our forest products are also subject to
increasing competition from a variety of non-wood and engineered
wood products. In addition, we are subject to competition from
lumber products and logs imported from foreign sources. Any
significant increase in competitive pressures from substitute
products or other domestic or foreign suppliers could have a
material adverse effect on our forestry operations.
If we
are unable to attract or retain experienced real estate
development personnel, our business may be adversely
affected.
Our future success largely depends on our ability to attract and
retain experienced real estate development personnel. The market
for these employees is highly competitive. If we cannot continue
to attract and retain quality personnel, our ability to
effectively operate our business may be significantly limited.
In addition, we are highly dependent upon the strategic vision
and operating experience of Peter Rummell, our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Rummells existing
employment agreement with the Company expires in August 2008. We
do not have key-person life insurance on Mr. Rummell.
Decline
in rental income could adversely affect our financial
results.
We own a 2.3 million square foot portfolio of commercial
real estate rental properties. Our profitability could be
adversely affected if:
|
|
|
|
|
a significant number of our tenants are unable to meet their
obligations to us;
|
|
|
|
we are unable to lease space at our properties when the space
becomes available; and
|
|
|
|
the rental rates upon a renewal or a new lease are significantly
lower than expected.
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
We have no unresolved comments from the Securities and Exchange
Commission regarding our periodic or current reports.
We own our principal executive offices located in Jacksonville,
Florida.
17
We own approximately 805,000 acres, the majority of which
are located in Northwest Florida, including over 200 miles
of gulf, lake and riverfront acreage. Most of our raw land
assets are managed as timberlands until designated for
development. At December 31, 2006, approximately
332,000 acres were encumbered under a wood fiber supply
agreement with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation which expires
on June 30, 2012. For more information on our real estate
assets, see Item 1. Business.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are involved in litigation on a number of matters and are
subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of
business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is
expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However,
the aggregate amount being sought by the claimants in these
matters is presently estimated to be several million dollars.
We are subject to costs arising out of environmental laws and
regulations, which include obligations to remove or limit the
effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain
wastes or substances at various sites, including sites which
have been previously sold. It is our policy to accrue and charge
against earnings environmental cleanup costs when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be
reasonably estimated. As assessments and cleanups proceed, these
accruals are reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, as additional
information becomes available.
Pursuant to the terms of various agreements by which we disposed
of our sugar assets in 1999, we are obligated to complete
certain defined environmental remediation. Approximately
$6.7 million was placed in escrow pending the completion of
the remediation. We have separately funded the costs of
remediation. Remediation was substantially completed in 2003.
Completion of remediation on one of the subject parcels occurred
during the third quarter of 2006, resulting in the release of
approximately $2.9 million of the escrowed funds to us on
August 1, 2006. We expect the remaining $3.8 million
held in escrow to be released to the Company in early 2007. The
release of escrow funds will not have any effect on our earnings.
Our former paper mill site in Gulf County and certain adjacent
property are subject to various Consent Agreements and
Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreements with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection. The paper mill site has
been assessed and rehabilitated by Smurfit-Stone Container
Corporation in accordance with these agreements. We are in the
process of rehabilitating the adjacent property in accordance
with these agreements. Management does not believe the liability
for any remaining required rehabilitation on these properties
will be material.
Other proceedings involving environmental matters are pending
against us. It is not possible to quantify future environmental
costs because many issues relate to actions by third parties or
changes in environmental regulation. However, management
believes that the ultimate disposition of currently known
matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
We had approximately 72,000 beneficial owners of our common
stock as of February 21, 2007. Our common stock is quoted
on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Composite
Transactions Tape under the symbol JOE.
18
The range of high and low prices for our common stock as
reported on the NYSE Composite Transactions Tape and the
dividends declared for the periods indicated is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
68.41
|
|
|
$
|
56.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
62.75
|
|
|
|
40.93
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
58.36
|
|
|
|
42.40
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
58.24
|
|
|
|
51.05
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
75.90
|
|
|
$
|
60.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
83.52
|
|
|
|
64.31
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
85.25
|
|
|
|
59.79
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
70.85
|
|
|
|
58.50
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
On February 22, 2007, the closing price of our common stock
on the NYSE was $55.56.
The following table describes the Companys purchases of
its common stock during the fourth quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Amount that May
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet Be Purchased
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Programs(2)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Month Ended October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,793
|
|
Month Ended November 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,793
|
|
Month Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
73,816
|
|
|
$
|
53.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,793
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes shares surrendered to the
Company by executives as payment for the strike prices and taxes
due on exercised stock options
and/or taxes
due on vested restricted stock equal in the aggregate to
73,816 shares in December 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
For additional information
regarding our Stock Repurchase Program, see Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements under the heading,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Earnings Per Share.
|
19
The following performance graph compares the Companys
cumulative shareholder returns for the period December 31,
2001, through December 31, 2006, assuming $100 was invested
on December 31, 2001, in the Companys common stock,
in the Russell 1000 Index and in the Wilshire Real Estate
Securities Index. The total return assumes dividends are
reinvested. The stock price performance shown on the graph below
is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/01
|
|
|
12/31/02
|
|
|
12/31/03
|
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
The St. Joe Company
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
Russell 1000 Index
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Wilshire Real Estate
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: |
Bloomberg L.P.
The St. Joe Company
|
20
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below are
qualified in their entirety by and should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere herein. The statement of income data with
respect to the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
have been derived from the consolidated financial statements of
the Company included herein, which have been audited by KPMG
LLP. The statement of income data with respect to the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the balance sheet data
as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been derived
from the financial statements of the Company previously filed
with the SEC, which also have been audited by KPMG LLP.
Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Income
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
748,192
|
|
|
$
|
932,124
|
|
|
$
|
838,002
|
|
|
$
|
675,401
|
|
|
$
|
556,148
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
669,965
|
|
|
|
753,108
|
|
|
|
699,904
|
|
|
|
536,402
|
|
|
|
452,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
78,227
|
|
|
|
179,016
|
|
|
|
138,098
|
|
|
|
138,999
|
|
|
|
103,894
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(15,954
|
)
|
|
|
(6,391
|
)
|
|
|
(5,227
|
)
|
|
|
(3,426
|
)
|
|
|
125,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates,
income taxes, and minority interest
|
|
|
62,273
|
|
|
|
172,625
|
|
|
|
132,871
|
|
|
|
135,573
|
|
|
|
229,485
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
9,307
|
|
|
|
13,016
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
10,940
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
25,157
|
|
|
|
64,153
|
|
|
|
52,334
|
|
|
|
48,270
|
|
|
|
88,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before minority interest
|
|
|
46,423
|
|
|
|
121,488
|
|
|
|
86,137
|
|
|
|
85,135
|
|
|
|
151,496
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
40,286
|
|
|
|
113,668
|
|
|
|
83,543
|
|
|
|
84,582
|
|
|
|
150,130
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations(2)
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
(8,667
|
)
|
|
|
3,346
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued
operations(2)
|
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
|
13,322
|
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
51,020
|
|
|
$
|
126,658
|
|
|
$
|
90,100
|
|
|
$
|
75,915
|
|
|
$
|
174,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Gain on the sale of discontinued
operations(2)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Gain on the sale of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate
|
|
$
|
1,213,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,174
|
|
|
$
|
942,630
|
|
|
$
|
886,076
|
|
|
$
|
806,701
|
|
Cash and investments(3)
|
|
|
36,935
|
|
|
|
202,605
|
|
|
|
94,816
|
|
|
|
57,403
|
|
|
|
73,273
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
44,593
|
|
|
|
40,176
|
|
|
|
33,562
|
|
|
|
36,272
|
|
|
|
42,907
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,560,395
|
|
|
|
1,591,946
|
|
|
|
1,403,629
|
|
|
|
1,275,730
|
|
|
|
1,169,887
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
627,056
|
|
|
|
554,446
|
|
|
|
421,110
|
|
|
|
382,176
|
|
|
|
320,915
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
461,080
|
|
|
|
488,998
|
|
|
|
495,411
|
|
|
|
487,315
|
|
|
|
480,093
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Total revenues includes real estate
revenues from property sales, timber sales, rental revenues and
other revenues, primarily club operations and management and
brokerage fees, and transportation revenues in 2002.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Discontinued operations include the
operations and subsequent sale of four commercial office
buildings in 2006, four commercial office buildings and Advantis
Real Estate Services Company (Advantis) in 2005, two
commercial office buildings sold in 2004 and the sales in 2002
of Arvida Realty Services (ARS) and two commercial
office buildings. (See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.)
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities.
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Forward-looking
Statements
We make forward-looking statements in this Report, particularly
in the Managements Discussion and Analysis, pursuant to
the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Any statements in this Report that are not
historical facts are forward-looking statements. You can find
many of these forward-looking statements by looking for words
such as intend, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect,
plan, should, forecast or
similar expressions. In particular, forward-looking statements
include, among others, statements about the following:
|
|
|
|
|
future operating performance, revenues, earnings, cash flows,
and short and long-term revenue and earnings growth rates;
|
|
|
|
future residential and commercial entitlements;
|
|
|
|
expected development timetables and projected timing for sales
or closings of homes or home sites in a community;
|
|
|
|
development approvals and the ability to obtain such approvals,
including possible legal challenges;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated price ranges of developments;
|
|
|
|
the number of units or commercial square footage that can be
supported upon full build out of a development;
|
|
|
|
the number, price and timing of anticipated land or building
sales or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
estimated land holdings for a particular use within a specific
time frame;
|
|
|
|
absorption rates and expected gains on land and home site sales;
|
|
|
|
the levels of resale inventory in our developments and the
regions in which they are located;
|
|
|
|
the development of relationships with strategic partners,
including homebuilders;
|
|
|
|
the pace at which we release new products for sale;
|
|
|
|
comparisons to historical projects;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of dividends we pay; and
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of company stock which may be purchased
under the companys existing or future share-repurchase
program.
|
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and
uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contemplated by a forward-looking
statement include the risk factors described above under the
heading Risk Factors. These statements are made as
of the date hereof based on our current expectations, and we
undertake no obligation to update the information contained in
this Report. New information, future events or risks may cause
the forward-looking events we discuss in this Report not to
occur.
Overview
The St. Joe Company is one of the largest real estate
development companies in Florida. We believe we have one of the
largest inventories of private land suitable for development in
Florida. The majority of our land is located in Northwest
Florida and has a very low cost basis. In order to optimize the
value of these core real estate assets, we seek to reposition
our substantial timberland holdings for higher and better uses.
We increase the value of our raw land assets through the
entitlement, development and subsequent sale of residential and
commercial parcels, home sites and homes, or through the direct
sale of unimproved land.
We have four operating segments: residential real estate,
commercial real estate, rural land sales and forestry.
Our residential real estate segment generates revenues from:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of developed home sites to retail customers and
builders;
|
|
|
|
the sale of parcels of entitled, undeveloped land;
|
|
|
|
the sale of housing units built by us;
|
|
|
|
rental income;
|
|
|
|
resort and club operations;
|
|
|
|
investments in limited partnerships and joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
brokerage, title issuance and mortgage origination fees on
certain transactions within our residential real estate
developments; and
|
|
|
|
management fees.
|
Our commercial real estate segment generates revenues from:
|
|
|
|
|
the rental
and/or sale
of commercial buildings owned
and/or
developed by us; and
|
|
|
|
the sale of developed and undeveloped land for retail,
multi-family, office and industrial uses.
|
Our rural land sales segment generates revenues from:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of parcels of undeveloped land; and
|
|
|
|
the sale of developed home sites primarily within rural settings.
|
Our forestry segment generates revenues from:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of pulpwood and timber; and
|
|
|
|
the sale of cypress lumber and mulch.
|
Our ability to obtain land-use entitlements for our properties
is a key requirement in repositioning our land to higher and
better uses and for the generation of revenues. We continue to
plan and obtain entitlements for an increasingly diverse set of
land uses including residential, retail, office, industrial and
multi-family uses.
23
At the end of 2006, we had land-use entitlements in hand or in
process for approximately 44,300 residential units and
14.5 million square feet of commercial space, with an
additional 627 acres zoned for commercial uses.
During 2006, Florida, like many other states across the nation,
experienced a dramatic slowdown in its real estate markets. This
real estate slowdown was reflected in our results of operations
for the year in which we experienced a 60% decline in net
income. The slowdown has also led to high levels of residential
resale inventories in our Florida markets, although recently we
have seen an increasing level of sales-center traffic in our
residential projects.
Due to existing market conditions, we are making a number of
adjustments in our communities. The pricing of some of our
resort and seasonal product is being revised to reflect current
market conditions. We are also lengthening the required time
periods for home-site purchasers to start construction of their
homes. And, with completed homes now in greater demand than home
sites, we are seeking new alliances with homebuilders to bring
finished product to market in our communities.
We are committed to long-term value creation, further
diversification of our development business and generating land
sales over a broader range of uses and price points. Regardless
of negative short-term market conditions, we believe that
long-term prospects for Florida, driven by job growth and
coupled with strong in-migration population expansion, will be
favorable over the long term.
During the third quarter, we announced that we are exiting the
Florida homebuilding business to focus on maximizing the value
of our landholdings through place making. For the last several
years, we have built homes in our towns in part because there
was limited homebuilding capacity in Northwest Florida. As
markets in the region have matured, homebuilding capacity from
national, regional and local homebuilders has expanded
significantly. Under our exit plan, our homebuilding operations
will wind down by mid-2008.
We are continuing to develop our relationships with national,
regional and local homebuilders (see Residential Real Estate
Segment below). We have executed purchase and option contracts
with several national and regional homebuilders for the purchase
of developed lots in various communities. These transactions
involve land positions in pre-development phases of our
communities as well as phases currently under development. These
transactions provide opportunities for us to accelerate value
realization, while at the same time decreasing capital intensity
and increasing efficiency in how we deliver housing to the
market. We expect national and regional homebuilders to be
important business partners going forward.
During late 2006 and early 2007, we implemented certain
corporate organizational changes designed to position JOE for
the years ahead. We eliminated certain redundancies among our
field and corporate operations, and put in place a regional
management structure to oversee our various product lines within
specific geographical areas. We believe our new organization
will facilitate the development of groups of projects with
multifaceted real estate product types. As discussed further
below, as a result of our exit from Florida homebuilding and
corporate reorganization, we recorded a restructuring charge of
$13.4 million during 2006. We expect to incur an additional
charge of $3.0 million in 2007.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base these
estimates on our historical experience and on various other
assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the
circumstances. Additionally, we evaluate the results of these
estimates on an on-going basis. Managements estimates form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
24
We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect
our more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Investment in Real Estate and Cost of Real Estate
Sales. Costs associated with a specific real
estate project are capitalized once we determine that the
project is economically probable. We capitalize costs directly
associated with development and construction of identified real
estate projects. Indirect costs that clearly relate to a
specific project under development, such as internal costs of a
regional project field office, are also capitalized. We
capitalize interest based on the amount of underlying
expenditures (up to total interest expense), and real estate
taxes on real estate projects under development. If we determine
not to complete a project, any previously capitalized costs are
expensed in the period such determination is made.
Real estate inventory costs include land and common development
costs ( such as roads, sewers and amenities), multi-family
construction costs, capitalized property taxes, capitalized
interest and certain indirect costs. A portion of real estate
inventory and estimates for costs to complete are allocated to
each unit based on the relative sales value of each unit as
compared to the estimated sales value of the total project.
These estimates are reevaluated at least annually, with any
adjustments being allocated prospectively to the remaining units
available for sale. The accounting estimate related to inventory
valuation is susceptible to change due to the use of assumptions
about future sales proceeds and related real estate
expenditures. Managements assumptions about future housing
and home site sales prices, sales volume and sales velocity
require significant judgment because the real estate market is
cyclical and highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions.
In addition, actual results could differ from managements
estimates due to changes in anticipated development,
construction and overhead costs. Although we have not made
significant adjustments affecting real estate gross profit
margins in the past, there can be no assurances that estimates
used to generate future real estate gross profit margins will
not differ from our current estimates. Construction costs for
single-family homes are determined based upon actual costs
incurred.
Revenue Recognition
Percentage-of-Completion. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, revenue
for multi-family residences under construction is recognized
using the
percentage-of-completion
method when (1) construction is beyond a preliminary stage,
(2) the buyer is committed to the extent of being unable to
require a refund except for nondelivery of the unit,
(3) sufficient units have already been sold to assure that
the entire property will not revert to rental property,
(4) sales price is assured, and (5) aggregate sales
proceeds and costs can be reasonably estimated. Revenue is then
recognized in proportion to the percentage of total costs
incurred in relation to estimated total costs.
Percentage-of-completion
accounting is also used for our home site sales when required
development is not complete at the time of sale and for
commercial and other land sales if there are uncompleted
development costs yet to be incurred for the property sold.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets and
Goodwill. Our long-lived assets, primarily real
estate held for investment, are carried at cost unless
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may
not be recoverable. If we determine that an impairment exists
due to the inability to recover an assets carrying value,
a provision for loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying
value exceeded estimated fair value. If such assets were held
for sale, the provision for loss would be recorded to the extent
that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value less costs
to sell.
Depending on the asset, we use varying methods to determine fair
value, such as (i) discounting expected future cash flows,
(ii) determining resale values by market, or
(iii) applying a capitalization rate to net operating
income using prevailing rates in a given market. The fair value
determined under these methods can fluctuate up or down
significantly as a result of a number of factors, including
changes in the general economy of our markets, demand for real
estate and the projected net operating income for a specific
property.
Goodwill is carried at the lower of cost or fair value and is
tested for impairment at least annually, or whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is
warranted, by comparing the carrying amount of the net assets of
each reporting unit with goodwill to the fair value of the
reporting unit taken as a whole. The impairment review involves
a number of assumptions and estimates including estimating
discounted future cash flows, net operating income, future
economic conditions, fair value of assets held and discount
rates. If this comparison indicates that the goodwill of a
particular reporting unit is impaired, the
25
aggregate of the fair value of each of the individual assets and
liabilities of the reporting unit are compared to the fair value
of the reporting unit to determine the amount of goodwill
impairment, if any.
Intangible Assets. We allocate the purchase
price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable
intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their
respective fair values, using customary estimates of fair value,
including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted
cash flow analysis and other methods. These fair values can
fluctuate up or down significantly as a result of a number of
factors and estimates, including changes in the general economy
of our markets, demand for real estate, lease terms,
amortization periods and fair market values assigned to leases
as well as fair value assigned to customer relationships.
Pension Plan. We sponsor a cash balance
defined-benefit pension plan covering a majority of our
employees. Currently, our pension plan is over-funded and
contributes income to the Company. The accounting for pension
benefits is determined by standardized accounting and actuarial
methods using numerous estimates, including discount rates,
expected long-term investment returns on plan assets, employee
turnover, mortality and retirement ages, and future salary
increases. Changes in these key assumptions can have a
significant impact on the income contributed by the pension
plan. We engage the services of an independent actuary and
investment consultant to assist us in determining these
assumptions and in the calculation of pension income. For
example, in 2006, a 1% increase in the assumed long-term rate of
return on pension assets would have resulted in a
$2.3 million increase in pre-tax income ($1.4 million
net of tax). A 1% decrease in the assumed long-term rate of
return would have caused an equivalent decrease in pre-tax
income. A 1% increase or decrease in the assumed discount rate
would have resulted in less than a $0.3 million change in
pre-tax income.
Stock-Based Compensation. We currently use the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value
of stock options. The determination of the fair value of
stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model is affected by the stock price as well as
assumptions regarding a number of other variables. These
variables include expected stock price volatility over the term
of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option
exercise behaviors (term of option), risk-free interest rate and
expected dividends.
We estimate the expected term of options granted by
incorporating the contractual term of the options and analyzing
employees, actual and expected exercise behaviors. We estimate
the volatility of our common stock by using historical
volatility in market price over a period consistent with the
expected term, and other factors. We base the risk-free interest
rate that we use in the option valuation model on
U.S. Treasury seven year issues with remaining terms
similar to the expected term on the options. We anticipate
paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore
use an estimated dividend yield in the option valuation model.
Income Taxes. In preparing our consolidated
financial statements, significant management judgment is
required to estimate our income taxes. Our estimates are based
on our interpretation of federal and state tax laws. We estimate
our actual current tax due and assess temporary differences
resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and
accounting purposes. The temporary differences result in
deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our
consolidated balance sheet. We record a valuation allowance
against our deferred tax assets based upon our analysis of the
timing and reversal of future taxable amounts and our history
and future expectations of taxable income. Adjustments may be
required by a change in assessment of our deferred tax assets
and liabilities, changes due to audit adjustments by federal and
state tax authorities, and changes in tax laws. To the extent
adjustments are required in any given period, we will include
the adjustments in the tax provision in our financial
statements. These adjustments could materially impact our
financial position, cash flow and results of operation.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of
SFAS Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for
uncertainties in income tax law. This Interpretation prescribes
a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of
26
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income
tax returns. We will adopt this Interpretation in the first
quarter of 2007. The cumulative effects, if any, of applying
FIN 48 will be recorded as an adjustment to retained
earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are
currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on our
consolidated financial statements, but are not yet in a position
to determine its impact.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS Statement
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 establishes a
single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a
framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional
disclosures about fair-value measurements. SFAS 157 applies
only to fair-value measurements that are already required or
permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to
increase the consistency of those measurements. SFAS 157 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We do not believe SFAS 157 will have a material
adverse impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In September 2006, the SEC Staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements (SAB 108).
SAB 108 provides guidance for SEC registrants on how the
effects of uncorrected errors originating in previous years
should be considered when quantifying errors in the current
year. SAB 108 was issued to eliminate diversity in practice
for quantifying uncorrected prior year misstatements (including
prior year unadjusted audit differences) and to address
weaknesses in methods commonly used to quantify such
misstatements. These methods are the income statement or
rollover method and the balance sheet or iron curtain method.
The Company has historically followed the income statement
method. Under SAB 108, SEC registrants will now have to
evaluate errors under both methods. SAB 108 provides
transitional guidance that allows registrants to report the
effect of adoption as a cumulative adjustment to beginning of
year retained earnings. If a cumulative adjustment is reported,
it must be reported as of the beginning of the first fiscal year
ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 did not have
an impact on our financial statements at December 31, 2006.
In September 2006, the SEC Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
issued EITF Issue
No. 06-8,
Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyers Continuing
Investment under FAS No. 66 for the Sale of
Condominiums (EITF
06-8).
EITF
06-8 states
that in assessing the collectibility of the sales price pursuant
to paragraph 37(d) of FAS 66, an entity should
evaluate the adequacy of the buyers initial and continuing
investment to conclude that the sales price is collectible. If
an entity is unable to meet the criteria of paragraph 37,
including an assessment of collectibility using the initial and
continuing investment tests described in
paragraphs 8-12
of FAS 66, then the entity should apply the deposit method
as described in
paragraphs 65-67
of FAS 66. EITF
06-8 is
effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2008. We have not yet assessed the impact of
EITF 06-8 on
our consolidated financial statements, but we believe that we
will be required, in most cases, to collect additional deposits
from buyers in order to recognize revenue under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting. If we are unable to meet the requirements
of EITF
06-8, we
would be required to recognize revenue using the deposit method,
which would delay revenue recognition until consumation of the
sale.
Results
of Operations
Net income for 2006 was $51.0 million, or $0.69 per
diluted share, compared with $126.7 million, or
$1.66 per diluted share, in 2005, and $90.1 million,
or $1.17 per diluted share, in 2004. Results for 2006
reported in discontinued operations included after-tax gains on
sales of four office buildings totaling $10.4 million, or
$0.15 per diluted share. Results for 2005 reported in
discontinued operations included an after-tax loss of
$5.9 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, resulting
from the sale of Advantis Real Estate Services Company
(Advantis), our former commercial real estate
services unit. Discontinued operations for 2005 also included
after-tax gains on sales of four office buildings totaling
$19.2 million, or $0.25 per diluted share.
We report revenues from our four operating segments: residential
real estate, commercial real estate, rural land sales and
forestry. Real estate sales are generated from sales of
residential homes and home sites, parcels
27
of developed and undeveloped land, and commercial buildings
which are not reported as discontinued operations. Rental
revenue is generated primarily from lease income related to our
portfolio of investment and development properties as a
component of the commercial real estate segment. Timber sales
are generated from the forestry segment. Other revenues are
primarily club operations and management fees from the
residential real estate segment.
Consolidated
Results
Revenues and Expenses. The following table
sets forth a comparison of the revenues and expenses for the
three years ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005
|
|
|
2005 vs. 2004
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
$
|
638.2
|
|
|
$
|
824.8
|
|
|
$
|
734.3
|
|
|
$
|
(186.6
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
$
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Rental
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Timber sales
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
748.2
|
|
|
$
|
932.1
|
|
|
$
|
838.0
|
|
|
$
|
(183.9
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
$
|
94.1
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sales
|
|
|
407.1
|
|
|
|
526.1
|
|
|
|
485.4
|
|
|
|
(119.0
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Cost of rental revenues
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Cost of timber sales
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Cost of other revenues
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
565.0
|
|
|
$
|
669.2
|
|
|
$
|
624.6
|
|
|
$
|
(104.2
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
$
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2006 decreases in revenues from real estate sales and costs
of real estate sales were in each case primarily due to
decreased sales in the residential real estate segment and, to a
lesser extent, the commercial real estate segment. The decreases
were partially offset by an increase in sales of rural land.
Additionally, during 2006 and 2005, four buildings were sold in
each year by the commercial real estate segment and recorded as
discontinued operations, and during 2004, two buildings were
sold by the commercial real estate segment and recorded as
discontinued operations. The increases in rental revenues and
costs of rental revenues were in each case primarily due to the
purchase of commercial buildings.
Timber revenue increased in 2006 due to an increase in harvest
volumes and in 2005 decreased due to price decreases. Cost of
timber sales increased in 2006 due to increased logging costs
caused primarily by higher fuel prices and road maintenance
costs. Cost of timber sales decreased in 2005 due to lower costs
in the timber operation resulting from lower sales.
The 2006 decrease in other revenues and related gross profit of
other revenues was primarily due to decreased resale brokerage
activity and increased resort costs. Other revenues and cost of
other revenues increased in 2005 primarily due to increases in
resort operations. Other operating expenses increased in 2006
due to increased marketing costs, increased project
administration expenses and increased insurance costs in our
residential real estate segment. For further discussion of
revenues and expenses, see Segment Results below.
Corporate Expense. Corporate expense,
representing corporate general and administrative expenses,
increased $3.3 million, or 7%, to $51.3 million in
2006 over 2005. The increase was primarily due to increased
stock compensation and other compensation costs. Stock
compensation costs increased $3.8 million primarily as a
result of the acceleration of restricted stock amortization
related to the retirement of our former President/COO and stock
compensation expense recorded under SFAS 123R. Other
compensation costs
28
increased $3.5 million substantially related to retirement
and/or
severance costs of our former President/COO and CFO. These cost
increases were primarily offset by a reduction in bonus expense
of $3.2 million. In 2005, corporate expense increased
$4.2 million, or 10%, to $48.0 million from
$43.7 million in 2004. The increase was due to an increase
in non-capitalizable entitlements costs, a decrease in pension
credit and an increase in compensation costs.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization increased $2.9 million, or 8%, to
$38.8 million in 2006 compared to $35.9 million in
2005. The increase was primarily due to an increase in
depreciation resulting from the purchase of one commercial
operating property. In 2005, depreciation and amortization
increased $6.3 million, or 21%, to $35.9 million
compared to $29.6 million in 2004. The increase was
primarily due to additional investments in commercial investment
property.
Impairment Losses. During 2006, we recorded a
$1.5 million impairment loss related to the goodwill of our
wholly owned affiliate, Sunshine State Cypress, Inc., included
in our forestry segment. No impairment losses were recorded in
2005. During 2004, we recorded a $2.0 million impairment
loss related to one of our residential projects in North
Carolina.
Restructuring Charge. We recorded a
restructuring charge of $13.4 million during 2006 in
connection with our exit from the Florida homebuilding business
and corporate reorganization. The charge included
$9.3 million related to the write-off of previously
capitalized homebuilding costs and $4.1 million related to
one-time termination benefits.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense)
consists of investment income, interest expense, gains on sales
and dispositions of assets and other, net. Other income
(expense) was $(15.9) million in 2006, $(6.4) million
in 2005, and $(5.2) million in 2004. Investment income
increased to $5.1 million in 2006 from $3.5 million in
2005 and $0.8 million in 2004 due primarily to higher
invested cash balances. Interest expense increased to
$20.6 million in 2006 from $13.9 million in 2005
primarily due to an increase in the average amount of debt
outstanding in 2006. Interest expense increased to
$13.9 million in 2005 from $9.9 million in 2004,
primarily due to an increase in the average amount of debt in
2005. Other, net decreased in 2006 primarily due to a litigation
provision of $4.9 million relating to a 1996 sales
commission dispute.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated
Affiliates. We have investments in affiliates
that are accounted for by the equity method of accounting.
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates totaled
$9.3 million in 2006, $13.0 million in 2005 and
$5.6 million in 2004. Equity income decreased
$3.7 million in 2006 primarily due to lower earnings in our
investments in Rivercrest and Paseos, which are nearing build
out. Equity income increased $7.4 million in 2005 from 2004
primarily due to increased closings at those two communities.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense on
continuing operations totaled $25.2 million in 2006,
$64.1 million in 2005 and $52.3 million in 2004. Our
effective tax rate was 38% in 2006, 36% in 2005 and 38% in 2004.
Discontinued Operations. Discontinued
operations include the operations and subsequent sales of four
commercial buildings sold in 2006, the sale of Advantis and four
commercial office buildings in 2005, and the operations and
sales of two commercial office buildings sold in 2004. These
entities results are not included in income from
continuing operations. See Commercial Real Estate
below for further discussion regarding our discontinued
operations.
Segment
Results
Residential
Real Estate
Our residential real estate segment develops large-scale,
mixed-use resort, primary and seasonal residential communities,
primarily on land we own with very low cost basis. We own large
tracts of land in Northwest Florida, including significant Gulf
of Mexico beach frontage and waterfront properties, and land
near Jacksonville, in Deland and near Tallahassee, the state
capital. Our residential homebuilding business in North and
South Carolina is conducted through Saussy Burbank, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary.
29
Residential sales slowed significantly in 2006, particularly in
our resort markets. As a result of the slowdown, inventories of
resale homes and home sites have risen dramatically in our
markets. These resale inventory levels will continue to impact
sales of our products in the majority of our markets throughout
2007. Although we believe these inventory levels may be trending
downward by the end of 2007, we continue to believe it could
take until 2008 before a supply-demand balance begins to return.
During the third quarter of 2006, we announced that we are
exiting the Florida homebuilding business to focus on maximizing
the value of our landholdings through place making. There was no
material impact to our financial results in 2006 related to our
exit from Florida homebuilding, other than the restructuring
charge. The exit move was made possible by our expanding
relationships with local, regional and national homebuilders. We
have executed purchase and option contracts with several
national and regional homebuilders for the purchase of developed
lots in various JOE communities. These transactions involve land
positions in pre-development phases as well as phases currently
under development. These transactions provide opportunities for
us to accelerate value realization, while at the same time
decreasing capital intensity and increasing efficiency in the
delivery of finished homes to the market.
During the period from April 1 through December 31,
2006, we had a total of 1,209 developed home sites under
contract or under option with David Weekley Homes and Beazer
Homes, of which 783 remain to be closed. We expect national and
regional homebuilders to be important business partners going
forward.
The table below sets forth our activity with national
homebuilders from April 1 through December 31, 2006:
Residential
Real Estate
National Homebuilder Summary
of Home Site Commitments and Purchases
April 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Units
|
|
|
Total Units
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Remaining Units
|
|
|
|
Committed(1)
|
|
|
Closed
12/31/06
|
|
|
Closed Units
|
|
|
To Close
|
|
|
Beazer Homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beckrich Point
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Laguna West
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
SouthWood
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
42,941
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Victoria Park
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
66,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Weekley Homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawks Landing
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
60,900
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Palmetto Trace
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
77,688
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
ParkPlace
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
RiverCamps on Crooked Creek
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
209,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
SouthWood
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Victoria Park
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
102,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
WaterSound
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
144,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes amounts under contract or
under option.
|
30
The table below sets forth the results of operations of our
residential real estate segment for the three years ended
December 31, 2006. The historical results of RiverCamps on
Crooked Creek have been reclassified from the rural land sales
segment to the residential real estate segment to conform to the
current periods presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
$
|
499.6
|
|
|
$
|
693.2
|
|
|
$
|
579.0
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
539.6
|
|
|
|
738.4
|
|
|
|
621.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sales
|
|
|
381.1
|
|
|
|
482.8
|
|
|
|
420.4
|
|
Cost of rental revenues
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Cost of other revenues
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
504.7
|
|
|
|
583.1
|
|
|
|
520.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
36.6
|
|
|
$
|
155.4
|
|
|
$
|
101.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and costs of sales associated with multi-family units
and Private Residence Club (PRC) units under
construction are recognized using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting. Revenue on contracted units is recognized
in proportion to the percentage of total costs incurred in
relation to estimated total costs. If a deposit is received for
less than 10% for a multi-family or PRC unit,
percentage-of-completion
accounting is not utilized. Instead, full accrual accounting
criteria are used, which requires recognition of revenue when
sales contracts are closed. All deposits are non-refundable
(subject to a
15-day
rescission period as required by law), except for non-delivery
of the unit. In the event a contract does not close for reasons
other than non-delivery, we are entitled to retain the deposit.
In such instances, the revenue and margin related to the
previously recorded contract is reversed. Revenues and cost of
sales associated with multi-family units where construction has
been completed before contracts are entered into and deposits
made are recognized on the full accrual method of accounting as
contracts are closed.
Our townhomes are attached building units sold individually
along with a parcel of land. Revenues and cost of sales for our
townhomes are accounted for using the full accrual method. These
units differ from multi-family and PRC units, in which buyers
hold title to a unit or fractional share of a unit,
respectively, within a building and an interest in the
underlying land held in common with other building association
members.
Profit is deferred on home site sales when required development
is not complete at the time of the sale. Currently, we are
deferring a portion of profit from home site sales at WaterSound
West Beach, SummerCamp and RiverCamps on Crooked Creek. Homesite
sales are recorded at the time of closing, but a portion of
revenue and gross profit on the sales at those communities is
deferred based on required development not yet completed in
relation to total required development costs and recognized by
the
percentage-of-completion
method as the work is completed.
31
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Real estate sales include sales of homes and home sites, as well
as sales of land. Cost of real estate sales for homes and home
sites includes direct costs (e.g., development and construction
costs), selling costs and other indirect costs (e.g.,
construction overhead, capitalized interest, warranty and
project administration costs).
The following table sets forth the components of our real estate
sales and cost of real estate sales related to homes and home
sites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Homes
|
|
|
Home Sites
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Homes
|
|
|
Home Sites
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
429.4
|
|
|
$
|
69.3
|
|
|
$
|
498.7
|
|
|
$
|
537.6
|
|
|
$
|
155.3
|
|
|
$
|
692.9
|
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
292.1
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
|
323.5
|
|
|
|
375.4
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
408.7
|
|
Selling costs
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Other indirect costs
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
344.3
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
380.3
|
|
|
|
440.3
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
482.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
85.1
|
|
|
$
|
33.3
|
|
|
$
|
118.4
|
|
|
$
|
97.3
|
|
|
$
|
112.9
|
|
|
$
|
210.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
The overall decreases in real estate sales, gross profit and
gross profit margin were due primarily to a decrease in home
site closings in our Northwest Florida resort communities and a
decrease in primary home closings in various communities.
The following table sets forth home and home site sales activity
by geographic region and property type, excluding Rivercrest and
Paseos, two 50% owned affiliates accounted for using the equity
method of accounting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Northwest Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
21.8
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
Multi-family homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Private Residence Club
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
Townhomes
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Northeast Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Central Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
81.5
|
|
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
|
92.6
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
Multi-family homes
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Townhomes
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
North and South Carolina:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
179.3
|
|
|
|
157.1
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
177.2
|
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
Townhomes
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
$
|
498.7
|
|
|
$
|
380.3
|
|
|
$
|
118.4
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
$
|
692.9
|
|
|
$
|
482.7
|
|
|
$
|
210.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
In 2006 and 2005, our Northwest Florida resort and seasonal
communities included WaterColor, WaterSound Beach, WaterSound
West Beach, WaterSound, WindMark Beach, RiverCamps on Crooked
Creek and SummerCamp, while primary communities included Hawks
Landing, Palmetto Trace, The Hammocks and SouthWood. In
Northeast Florida the only primary community was St. Johns Golf
and Country Club. The Central Florida communities included
Artisan Park and Victoria Park, both of which are primary. North
and South Carolina included Saussy Burbanks primary
communities in Charlotte, Raleigh and Charleston.
In our Northwest Florida resort communities, closed units,
revenues and gross profit decreased significantly in 2006
compared to 2005 as the demand for resort residential product
has decreased. The gross profit from home site sales decreased
to $20.5 million in 2006 from $97.0 million in 2005
due primarily to decreases in the number of home sites closed in
SummerCamp, RiverCamps on Crooked Creek, WaterColor and
WaterSound Beach. The decreases resulting from these reduced
closings were partially offset by closings in WaterSound and
WindMark Beach as sales of home sites in these communities
commenced in the second and third quarters of 2006,
respectively. No gross profit was recognized from multi-family
residences in 2006, compared to $8.0 million in 2005 for
the multi-family residences at WaterSound Beach which were
completed in 2005.
Since required development was not complete at WaterSound West
Beach, SummerCamp and RiverCamps on Crooked Creek at the time
home sites were closed in these communities, percentage of
completion accounting was used, and deferred profit will be
recognized as the required infrastructure is completed. From
project inception through the end of 2006, remaining
unrecognized deferred profit at WaterSound West Beach was
$1.4 million, substantially all of which we expect to
recognize by the end of 2007; at RiverCamps on Crooked Creek it
was $1.1 million, substantially all of which we expect to
recognize by the end of the first quarter of 2007; and at
SummerCamp it was $9.2 million, all of which we expect to
recognize over the next several years.
In our Northwest Florida primary communities, closed units,
revenues and gross profit decreased in 2006 as compared to 2005
due to market conditions. The gross profit from single-family
home sales decreased $0.5 million in 2006 from 2005 as a
result of a decrease of 95 units closed. Due primarily to
an increase in the average sales price of homes closed in
Palmetto Trace and Southwood (the average price of single-family
residences closed in these communities in 2006 was $305,000
compared to $258,000 in 2005), the decrease in gross profit was
not as significant as the decrease in unit closings. Townhome
revenues and the number of townhomes closed decreased in 2006 as
compared to 2005 as we have closed most of the townhomes
previously offered for sale in these communities. Home site
closings and gross profit increased in 2006 compared with 2005
due primarily to increased closings in Palmetto Trace and Hawks
Landing resulting from our expanding relationships with national
and regional homebuilders, although the average price decreased,
reflecting a change in the type of product sold. The average
price of a home site sold in 2006 was $63,000 compared to
$93,000 in 2005.
In our Northeast Florida communities, closed units, revenues and
gross profit decreased in 2006 as compared to 2005 as a result
of a lack of product availability. The decreases were partially
offset by an increase in the average price of a single-family
residence to $520,000 in 2006 compared to $413,000 in 2005. St.
Johns Golf and Country Club is nearing its completion in early
2007, while James Island and Hampton Park were completed during
2005. Future home site product will become available in
Northeast Florida at RiverTown, with sales expected to begin in
2007.
In our Central Florida communities, the gross profit on
single-family home sales decreased to $24.8 million in 2006
from $26.2 million in 2005 as a result of unit closings
decreasing to 183 from 353. Due to our ability to achieve
stronger pricing on contracts in these communities last year
(the average price of single-family residences closed in these
communities in 2006 was $445,000 compared to $337,000 in 2005),
the decrease in gross profit was not as significant as the
decrease in unit closings. Gross profit percentages recognized
using
percentage-of-completion
accounting on multi-family residences increased to 35% in 2006
from 25% in 2005 due primarily to our ability to raise prices to
more than offset increased construction costs. Home site
closings and revenue increased in 2006 compared with 2005 due
primarily to third quarter sales to David Weekly Homes and
fourth quarter sales to Beazer Homes. The average price of a
home site in 2006
33
was $82,000 compared to $190,000 in 2005 due to a change in the
type of product sold to these homebuilders. Increased sales of
townhomes during 2006 resulted in increased revenues and gross
profit of $7.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively,
as compared to 2005.
In our North and South Carolina communities, the gross profit on
single-family home sales increased to $22.2 million in 2006
from $18.6 million in 2005 due primarily to price increases
on comparable homes. The average price of a home closed in 2006
was $289,000 compared to $256,000 in 2005.
Other revenues included revenues from the WaterColor Inn and
WaterColor vacation rental program, other resort and club
operations, management fees and brokerage activities. Other
revenues were $38.3 million in 2006 with $41.6 million
in related costs, compared to revenues totaling
$43.6 million in 2005 with $39.6 million in related
costs. The decrease in other revenues and related deficit was
primarily due to the decrease in resale brokerage activity and
increased resort costs. The decrease in resale brokerage
activity coincided with the slowdown in residential sales. The
increase in resort costs included salaries and salary related
costs in our Northwest Florida resort operations, which was due
primarily to costs associated with new resort operations in
WaterSound Beach during 2006.
Other operating expenses included salaries and benefits,
marketing, project administration, support personnel and other
administrative expenses. Other operating expenses increased to
$56.6 million in 2006 from $49.0 million in 2005 due
to increased marketing costs associated with a regional brand
campaign, increased project administration expenses resulting
from new projects at Seven Shores, RiverTown and the second
phase of Windmark Beach, and increased insurance costs.
We recorded a restructuring charge in our residential real
estate segment of $12.3 million in 2006 in connection with
our exit from the Florida homebuilding business and corporate
reorganization. The charge included $9.3 million related to
the write off of previously capitalized homebuilding costs and
$3.0 million related to one-time termination benefits for
affected employees.
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Real estate sales include sales of homes and home sites, as well
as sales of land. Cost of real estate sales for homes and home
sites includes direct costs (e.g., development and construction
costs), selling costs and other indirect costs (e.g.,
construction overhead, capitalized interest, warranty and
project administration costs).
The following table sets forth the components of our real estate
sales and cost of real estate sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
Homes
|
|
|
Home Sites
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Homes
|
|
|
Home Sites
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
537.6
|
|
|
$
|
155.3
|
|
|
$
|
692.9
|
|
|
$
|
462.0
|
|
|
$
|
113.8
|
|
|
$
|
575.8
|
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
375.4
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
408.7
|
|
|
|
323.4
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
350.9
|
|
Selling costs
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
Other indirect costs
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
440.3
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
482.7
|
|
|
|
382.9
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
419.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
97.3
|
|
|
$
|
112.9
|
|
|
$
|
210.2
|
|
|
$
|
79.1
|
|
|
$
|
77.1
|
|
|
$
|
156.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
34
The changes in the components of our real estate sales and cost
of real estate sales from the year ended December 31, 2005,
to the year ended December 31, 2004, are set forth below by
geographic region and product type. A more detailed explanation
of the changes follows the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resort
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family homes
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Residence Club
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
94.9
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Townhomes
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
|
92.6
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
63.6
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-family homes
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Townhomes
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home sites
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
North and South Carolina:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family homes
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
177.2
|
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
163.6
|
|
|
|
149.3
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Townhomes
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
$
|
692.9
|
|
|
$
|
482.7
|
|
|
$
|
210.2
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
575.8
|
|
|
$
|
419.6
|
|
|
$
|
156.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005 and 2004, our Northwest Florida resort and seasonal
communities included WaterColor, WaterSound Beach, WaterSound
West Beach, WaterSound, WindMark Beach, RiverCamps on Crooked
Creek and SummerCamp, while primary communities included Hawks
Landing, Palmetto Trace, The Hammocks and SouthWood. In
Northeast Florida the primary communities were St. Johns Golf
and Country Club, Hampton Park and James Island. The Central
Florida communities included Artisan Park and Victoria Park,
both of which are primary. North and South Carolina included
Saussy Burbanks primary communities in Charlotte, Raleigh
and Charleston.
In our Northwest Florida resort communities, revenue and closed
units decreased in 2005 compared to 2004 due to reduced activity
in the second half of the year in our resort residential
projects as the 2005 hurricane season depressed normal traffic
flow to the region. The gross profit percentage from
single-family residence sales decreased to 28% in 2005 from 33%
in 2004, primarily due to the mix of relative location and size
of the home sales closed in each period. The average price of a
single-family residence sold in 2005 was $888,000 compared to
$1,250,000 in 2004. The decrease in average sales price is due
primarily to the sale of the Southern Accents Showhouse at
WaterSound Beach in 2004 at a price of $5.1 million. Gross
profit recognized on the sale of multi-family residences
decreased in 2005 due to the completion of profit recognition
35
on certain multi-family residences in 2004. The gross profit
percentage from home site sales increased to 77% in 2005 from
71% in 2004 due primarily to an increase in average prices of
home sites sold and a change in the mix of relative locations of
the closed home sites.
Since required development was not complete at WaterSound West
Beach, SummerCamp and RiverCamps on Crooked Creek at the time
home sites were closed in these communities, percentage of
completion accounting was used and deferred profit will be
recognized as the required infrastructure is completed. From
project inception through the end of 2005, remaining
unrecognized deferred profit at WaterSound West Beach was
$3.0 million; at RiverCamps on Crooked Creek it was
$3.2 million; and at SummerCamp it was $8.0 million.
In our Northwest Florida primary communities, units closed and
revenues increased due to strong demand which supported price
increases. The gross profit percentage from single-family home
sales increased to 17% in 2005 from 8% in 2004, primarily due to
an increase in the average sales price and the mix of location
and size of the home sales closed. The average price of a
single-family residence closed in 2005 was $258,000 compared to
$218,000 in 2004. Also during 2004, gross profit was reduced by
a $1.7 million expense recorded for warranty costs in
excess of warranty reserves at a previously completed community.
Townhome gross profit percentages also increased in 2005 due
primarily to an increase in sales prices of approximately 10%
and the mix of locations of the townhomes closed. Home site
gross profit percentages decreased to 44% in 2005 from 46% in
2004 due primarily to the closing of lower margin home sites in
our Port St. Joe primary housing developments during 2005.
In our Northeast Florida communities, closed units and revenues
decreased in 2005 as a result of a lack of product availability
in James Island and Hampton Park, which were substantially sold
out in 2004 and completed during 2005. The gross profit
percentage from single-family residence sales increased to 23%
in 2005 from 16% in 2004 primarily due to the strong demand
supporting higher prices as we approached sellout in these
communities. The average price of a single-family residence
closed in 2005 was $413,000 compared to $355,000 in 2004. Home
site gross profit percentages increased to 74% in 2005 from 62%
in 2004 due primarily to the mix of sizes and locations of the
home sites sold during each period.
In our Central Florida communities, the gross profit percentage
on single-family home sales increased to 22% in 2005 from 19% in
2004. The increase, which was a result of our ability to achieve
stronger pricing in these primary communities, was partly offset
by increasing construction costs following the 2004 hurricane
season. Gross profit recognized on the sale of multi-family
residences increased $9.9 million in 2005 due to the
accelerated sales and construction activity and the resulting
profit recognition under
percentage-of-completion
accounting. Gross profit percentages on multi-family residences
increased to 25% in 2005 from 19% in 2004 due primarily to our
ability to raise prices to more than offset increased
construction costs. The gross profit percentage from home site
sales increased to 59% in 2005 from 54% in 2004 due primarily to
the increased average price of home sites to $190,000 in 2005
compared to $112,000 in 2004. Sales of condominium units in
Artisan Park slowed in 2005 due to the increased supply of units
in the Orlando area as a result of condominium conversion
projects. Another factor in the slower sales was competition
from the resale of units sold to investors earlier in the life
of the project.
In our North and South Carolina communities, the gross profit
percentage on single-family home sales increased to 10% in 2005
from 9% in 2004 due primarily to price increases on comparable
homes, lower buyer incentives and changes in the mix of relative
locations of homes closed in each period. During 2004 we also
recorded an impairment loss of $2.0 million related to one
of Saussy Burbanks community development projects.
Other revenues included revenues from the WaterColor Inn, other
resort and club operations, management fees and brokerage
activities. Other revenues were $43.6 million in 2005 with
$39.6 million in related costs, compared to revenues
totaling $41.5 million in 2004 with $37.5 million in
related costs.
Other operating expenses include salaries and benefits,
marketing, project administration, support personnel and other
administrative expenses. Other operating expenses in 2004
included $3.0 million of nonrecurring uninsured losses
related to storm damage while similar losses incurred in 2005
were $1.0 million.
36
Commercial Real Estate. Our commercial
real estate segment plans, develops and entitles our land
holdings for a broad portfolio of retail, office and commercial
uses. We sell and develop commercial land and provide
development opportunities for national and regional retailers in
Northwest Florida. We believe that national and regional retail
developers have now discovered Northwest Florida and continue to
express a high level of interest in the region. We also offer
land for commercial and light industrial uses within large and
small-scale commerce parks, as well as for a wide range of
multi-family for-sale and for-rent projects.
As a contrast to demand for residential real estate products,
demand for Florida commercial real estate in 2006 was strong,
consistent with 2005 and 2004. The table below sets forth the
results of operations of our commercial real estate segment for
the three years ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
|
$
|
87.2
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
|
|
|
113.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sales
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
Cost of rental revenues
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
72.2
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
|
$
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Sales. Land sales for the three
years ended December 31, 2006 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
Land
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
per Acre(c)
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
on Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Florida
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
200.4
|
|
|
$
|
48.9
|
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
(a)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
200.4
|
|
|
$
|
48.9
|
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Florida
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
140.5
|
|
|
$
|
30.9
|
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
21.9
|
(b)
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
128.4
|
|
|
$
|
63.7
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Florida
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
$
|
113.6
|
|
|
$
|
43.6
|
|
|
$
|
43.6
|
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
522.2
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
148.6
|
|
|
$
|
62.4
|
|
|
$
|
62.4
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Net of deferred revenue and gain on
sales, based on
percentage-of-completion
accounting, of $0.4 million and $0.1 million,
respectively.
|
37
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Net of deferred revenue and gain on
sales, based on
percentage-of-completion
accounting, of $1.0 million and $0.7 million,
respectively.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Average price per acre in thousands.
|
The change in average
per-acre
prices reflected a change in the mix of commercial land sold in
each period, with varying compositions of retail, office, light
industrial, multi-family and other commercial uses. In 2005 and
2004, the commercial segment had larger numbers of sales due to
the sale of non-strategic positions. Pricing increased in 2006
compared to 2005 and 2004 for office and light industrial land
with average pricing at our Commerce Parks of $196,000 per
acre for the year 2006, compared with average pricing of
$97,000 per acre in 2005 and $75,000 per acre in 2004.
In 2006, compared to 2005 and 2004, the commercial segment
shifted its multifamily focus from smaller local builders to
regional and national companies. This shift resulted in fewer
multifamily sales but increased pricing to $232,000 per
acre for the year 2006, compared with average pricing of
$105,000 per acre in 2005 and $25,000 per acre in 2004.
For additional information about our Commerce Parks, see the
table Summary of Additional Commercial Land-Use
Entitlements in the Business section above.
Rental Revenues. Rental revenues generated by
our commercial real estate segment on owned operating properties
increased $6.2 million, or 19%, in 2006 compared to 2005
primarily due to the acquisition of one building in December of
2005, with approximately 225,000 rentable square feet. The
year ended December 31, 2006 also included recognition of
$0.8 million of termination fees related to three tenants
terminating their leases early. Cost of rental revenues
increased $2.9 million, or 24%, in 2006 compared to 2005,
primarily due to the building acquisition and increased
operating costs. Rental revenues increased $9.0 million, or
37%, for 2005 compared to 2004 due to the acquisition of five
buildings in the last half of 2004, with an aggregate of
553,000 rentable square feet. Cost of rental revenues
increased $2.5 million, or 26%, due to the acquired
buildings.
Further information about our commercial income producing
properties is presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Rentable
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Rentable
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Rentable
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
Buildings purchased with
tax-deferred proceeds by location:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
Northwest Florida
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Orlando
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
317,000
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
317,000
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
317,000
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Atlanta
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,289,000
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,289,000
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,289,000
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
354,000
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
354,000
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal/Average
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2,252,000
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2,252,000
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2,027,000
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Florida
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal/Average
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2,289,000
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2,289,000
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2,027,000
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lease for the sole tenant in one of our Virginia buildings
will expire in February 2008. At this time a replacement tenant
has not yet been obtained. We are continuing to aggressively
market the vacant spaces in Atlanta and Virginia.
38
In January 2007, we entered into an exclusive listing agreement
with Eastdil Secured, LLC, a real estate brokerage firm, for the
marketing and potential disposition of our office building
portfolio. The portfolio is located in seven markets throughout
the Southeast and consists of 17 buildings with approximately
2.3 million net rentable square feet. The likelihood and
timing of the possible sale will depend upon market reaction and
other variables. The portfolio does not currently meet the
criteria for classification as assets held for sale.
Depreciation and amortization, primarily consisting of
depreciation on income producing properties and amortization of
lease intangibles, increased to $20.5 million in 2006
compared to $17.3 million in 2005, due to the building
placed in service in December 2005.
Total proceeds from building sales recorded in continuing
operations in 2004 were $24.8 million, with a pre-tax gain
of $2.9 million. Building sales in 2004 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of the
99,000-square
foot TNT Logistics building located in Jacksonville, Florida,
for $12.8 million, with a pre-tax gain of
$3.0 million; and
|
|
|
|
the sale of the
100,000-square
foot Westside Corporate Center building located in Plantation,
Florida, for $12.0 million, with a pre-tax loss of
$(0.1) million.
|
Discontinued Operations. Discontinued
operations related to this segment for 2006 included the sale
and results of operations of four commercial buildings sold in
2006. Discontinued operations for 2005 included those four
buildings, the sale and results of operations of four commercial
buildings sold in 2005, and the sale and results of operations
of Advantis sold in 2005.
Building sales included in discontinued operations for 2006
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The sale of Nextel II, with net rentable square feet of
30,000 in Panama City, Florida, on December 20 for proceeds of
$4.9 million and a pre-tax gain of $1.7 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of One Crescent Ridge, with net rentable square feet of
158,000 in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 29 for
proceeds of $31.3 million and a pre-tax gain of
$10.6 million; and
|
|
|
|
The sales of Prestige Place One & Two, with net
rentable square feet of 147,000 in Tampa, Florida, on June 28
for proceeds of $18.1 million and a pre-tax gain of
$4.4 million.
|
Building sales included in discontinued operations for 2005
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
1133
20th Street,
with 119,000 net rentable square feet in Washington, DC,
sold on September 29 for proceeds of $46.9 million and a
pre-tax gain of $19.7 million;
|
|
|
|
Lakeview, with 127,000 net rentable square feet in Tampa,
Florida, sold on September 7 for proceeds of $18.0 million
and a pre-tax gain of $4.1 million;
|
|
|
|
Palm Court, with 62,000 net rentable square feet in Tampa,
Florida, sold September 7 for proceeds of $7.0 million and
a pre-tax gain of $1.8 million; and
|
|
|
|
Harbourside, with 153,000 net rentable square feet in
Clearwater, Florida, sold December 14 for proceeds of
$21.9 million and a pre-tax gain of $5.2 million.
|
On September 7, 2005, we sold Advantis for
$11.4 million (including $7.5 million in notes
receivable from the purchaser) at a pre-tax loss of
$9.9 million. Under the terms of the sale, we continue to
use Advantis to manage certain commercial properties and also
involve Advantis in certain sales of our land.
Building sales included in discontinued operations in 2004
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
1750 K Street, with 152,000 net rentable square feet in
Washington, DC, sold on July 30 for proceeds of
$47.3 million ($21.9 million, net of the assumption of
a mortgage by the purchaser) and a pre-tax gain of
$7.5 million; and
|
|
|
|
Westchase Corporate Center, with 184,000 net rentable
square feet in Houston, Texas, sold on August 16 for proceeds of
$20.3 million and a pre-tax gain of $0.2 million.
|
39
Rural Land Sales. Our rural land sales
segment markets for sale tracts of land of varying sizes for
rural recreational, conservation, residential and timberland
uses. The land sales segment prepares land for sale for these
uses through harvesting, thinning and other silviculture
practices, and in some cases, limited infrastructure development.
The table below sets forth the results of operations of our
rural land sales segment for the three years ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
$
|
89.9
|
|
|
$
|
68.9
|
|
|
$
|
68.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sales
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Cost of other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
72.5
|
|
|
$
|
50.7
|
|
|
$
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rural land sales for the three years ended December 31,
2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Gross Sales
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Period
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Per Acre
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
34,336
|
|
|
$
|
2,621
|
|
|
$
|
89.9
|
|
|
$
|
82.5
|
|
2005
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
28,958
|
|
|
$
|
2,378
|
|
|
$
|
68.9
|
|
|
$
|
59.3
|
|
2004
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
20,175
|
|
|
$
|
3,375
|
|
|
$
|
68.1
|
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
During 2006, we sold two large tracts of land totaling
15,469 acres for an average price of $1,700 per acre.
We continually evaluate the pricing and timing of land sales
based upon a careful analysis of the present value of the land.
Land sales for 2005 included the sales of two parcels totaling
1,046 acres in southwest Georgia for $2.5 million, or
$2,390 per acre. Earlier in 2005, we paid $1,225 per
acre for approximately 47,000 acres in southwest Georgia.
Land sales for 2004 included two parcels with an aggregate of
20,000 feet of frontage on North Bay in Bay County,
Florida, and a parcel with approximately 5,000 feet of
frontage on East Bay in Bay County. The two North Bay parcels,
of approximately 349 and 323 acres, sold for
$8.7 million, or approximately $25,000 per acre, and
$8.7 million, or approximately $27,000 per acre,
respectively. The East Bay parcel of 866 acres sold for
$10.0 million, or approximately $11,550 per acre.
Since average sales prices per acre vary according to the
characteristics of each particular piece of land being sold, our
average prices may vary from one period to another.
The historical results of RiverCamps on Crooked Creek have been
reclassified from the rural land sales segment to the
residential real estate segment to conform to the current year
presentation.
40
Forestry. The table below sets forth
the results of operations of our forestry segment for the three
years ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timber sales
|
|
$
|
29.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
|
$
|
35.2
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of timber sales
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the forestry segment increased
$2.0 million, or 7%, compared to 2005. Sales under our
fiber agreement with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation were
$13.0 million (692,600 tons) in 2006 and $12.0 million
(678,000 tons) in 2005. Sales to other customers totaled
$11.3 million (623,300 tons) in 2006 as compared to
$9.9 million (529,000 tons) in 2005. The increase in
revenue and tons sold to outside customers resulted from our
ability to harvest more solid wood products due to better
operating conditions and planning. Revenues for the cypress mill
operation were $5.6 million in 2006 and $6.0 million
in 2005. Revenues from the cypress mill were lower in 2006 due
to the lack of customer demand for our mulch product.
Cost of sales for the forestry segment increased
$1.9 million in 2006 compared to 2005. Costs of sales as a
percentage of revenue were 73% in 2006 and 72% in 2005. The
increase in cost of sales was due to increased logging costs
caused by higher diesel fuel prices and increased road
maintenance expense. Cost of sales for the cypress mill
operation were $4.9 million or 88% of revenues in 2006 and
$4.5 million or 75% of revenues in 2005.
During 2006, the Company utilized a discounted cash flow method
to determine the fair value of Sunshine State Cypress and
recorded an impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of
goodwill from $8.8 million to $7.3 million. This
resulted in an impairment loss of $1.5 million pre-tax, or
$0.9 million net of tax.
Revenues for the forestry segment in 2005 decreased
$7.3 million, or 21%, compared to 2004. Total sales under
the fiber agreement with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation
were $12.0 million (678,000 tons) in 2005 and
$13.0 million (681,000 tons) in 2004. Sales to other
customers totaled $9.9 million (529,000 tons) in 2005 and
$14.5 million (653,000 tons) in 2004. The 2005 decrease in
revenues under the fiber agreement was primarily due to lower
pulpwood prices under the terms of the agreement. In 2005 and
2004, sales to other customers decreased due to
managements decision to reduce the harvested volume from
clear-cut operations in order to retain more timber on certain
tracts planned for later sale for recreational or residential
purposes. Revenues from the cypress mill operation were
$6.0 million in 2005 and $7.7 million in 2004.
Revenues from the cypress mill were lower in 2005 due to lower
prices as a result of the increased supply of fallen timber
caused by hurricanes.
Cost of timber sales decreased $1.8 million, or 8%, in 2005
compared to 2004. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues was
72% in 2005 and 62% in 2004. The increase in cost of sales as a
percentage of revenues was due primarily to increased logging
costs caused by fuel shortages from Hurricane Katrina, road
maintenance and timber inventory costs. Cost of sales for the
cypress mill operation were $4.5 million, or 75% of
revenues, in 2005, and $5.4 million, or 70% of revenues, in
2004. Cost of sales for timber was $15.5 million, or 71% of
revenues, in 2005 and $16.4 million, or 59% of revenues, in
2004.
41
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We generate cash from:
|
|
|
|
|
Operations;
|
|
|
|
Sales of land holdings, other assets and subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
Borrowings from financial institutions and other debt; and
|
|
|
|
Issuances of equity, primarily from the exercise of employee
stock options.
|
We use cash for:
|
|
|
|
|
Operations;
|
|
|
|
Real estate development;
|
|
|
|
Construction and homebuilding;
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
Payments of dividends;
|
|
|
|
Repayments of debt;
|
|
|
|
Payments of taxes; and
|
|
|
|
Investments in joint ventures and acquisitions.
|
Management believes we have adequate resources to fund ongoing
operating requirements and future capital expenditures related
to the continued investment in real estate developments. In
light of current real estate market conditions, however, we have
significantly adjusted our capital investment plans and continue
to evaluate the appropriateness of our plans. We also intend to
continue to be prudent in our approach toward share repurchase
activity in 2007 considering our other capital commitments. If
our liquidity were not adequate to fund our cash requirements,
we would have various alternatives available to change our cash
flow, including reducing or eliminating our share repurchase
program, reducing or eliminating dividends, changing our capital
structure, altering the timing of our development projects
and/or
selling existing assets.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows related to assets ultimately planned to be sold,
including residential real estate development and related
amenities, sales of undeveloped and developed land by the rural
land sales segment, the Companys timberland operations and
land developed by the commercial real estate segment, are
included in operating activities on the statement of cash flows.
Distributions of income from unconsolidated affiliates are also
included in cash flows from operating activities.
Net cash (used in) provided by operations was
($143.9) million during 2006 compared to
$192.0 million in 2005 and $128.2 million in 2004.
Expenditures relating to our residential real estate segment in
2006, 2005 and 2004 were $531.4 million,
$515.7 million and $488.8 million, respectively.
Expenditures for operating properties in 2006, 2005 and 2004
totaled $55.6 million, $33.9 and $62.6 million,
respectively, and were made up of commercial land development
and residential club and resort property development.
The changes in other tax related balance sheet accounts were
primarily related to $125.1 million in estimated tax
payments related to the 2006 tax year. These tax payments were
primarily attributable to the recognition of previously deferred
gains on land sales and involuntary conversions, which have now
met the criteria for recognition in our 2006 tax return. We also
expect to make significant tax payments in 2007 related to an
IRS audit of the years
2001-2004.
The balances expected to be affected by any tax settlement
include other liabilities, taxes payable and deferred taxes. We
expect to continue to make significant cash payments of income
taxes, including deferred taxes, in future years.
The expenditures for operating activities relating to our
residential real estate and commercial real estate segments were
primarily for site infrastructure development, general amenity
construction, construction of
42
single-family homes, construction of multi-family buildings and
commercial land development. In 2006, approximately 50% of these
expenditures were for home construction that generally takes
place after the signing of a binding contract with a buyer to
purchase the home upon completion of construction. Due to our
exit from Florida homebuilding, we expect a significant
reduction in construction expenditures related to single-family
homes after we finish the homes currently under construction in
Florida. Total expenditures for single-family home construction
in the future are expected to decline significantly and the
resulting percentage of total expenditures may significantly
change depending on the total amount of non-homebuilding
construction activity in future periods.
Over the next several years, our need for cash for operations
will remain significant as development activity continues.
During 2006, we had five new residential communities requiring
significant up-front capital investment, and these communities
will continue to require capital expenditures.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
The Companys buildings developed for commercial rental
purposes and assets purchased with tax-deferred proceeds are
held for investment purposes and related cash flows from
acquisitions and dispositions of those assets are included in
investing activities on the statements of cash flows. Cash flows
from investing activities also include related cash flows from
assets not held for sale. Distributions of capital from
unconsolidated affiliates are included in cash flows from
investing activities.
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was
$29.9 million in 2006 compared to $(31.9) million in
2005 and $(32.4) million in 2004. Net cash provided in 2006
primarily was a result of $52.8 million in proceeds related
to the sales of discontinued operations. Net cash used in 2005
included $88.8 million in proceeds from sales of
discontinued operations, net of cash included in assets sold.
Purchases of investments in real estate in 2005 included
$20.9 million for the purchase of a commercial office
building and related intangible assets net of assumption of a
mortgage on the property of $29.9 million, the purchases of
16 acres of property in Manatee County for
$18.0 million and 47,303 acres of timberland in
Southwest Georgia for $58.3 million, in tax-deferred
like-kind exchanges and $9.6 million of other real estate
investments. Net cash used in investing activities in 2004
included $64.4 million for the purchase of five commercial
office buildings and related intangible assets,
$41.1 million in proceeds from the sale of discontinued
operations and $17.7 million of other real estate
investments.
The purchase of commercial buildings and land, comprising the
majority of the cash used in investing activities, generally
follow the sale of real estate, principally land sales on a
tax-deferred basis. The tax deferral requires the reinvestment
of proceeds from qualifying sales within a required time frame.
We make these investments in buildings and land only when we can
acquire these assets at attractive prices. It is becoming
increasingly difficult to acquire assets that meet our pricing
and other criteria for reinvestment, and as a result we may not
purchase commercial buildings and vacant land to the extent we
have in the past. Additionally, as our sales activity has
slowed, the amount of cash available for purchase activities has
decreased.
We have recently entered into a listing agreement for the
marketing and potential disposition of our office building
portfolio. Our portfolio is located in seven markets throughout
the Southeast and consists of seventeen buildings with
approximately 2.3 million of net rentable square feet. The
potential sale proceeds related to this asset disposition could
have a significant positive impact on investing cash flows in
2007 if such a sale were to occur.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $51.7 million in
2006, $52.3 million in 2005 and $58.4 million in 2004.
As a result of the significant development and investing
activities anticipated over the next several years, we expect
our debt to increase compared to December 31, 2006 levels.
In 2007, we have approximately $229.3 million of debt
maturing, and we expect to spend $50 million to
$100 million for dividend payments and the repurchase of
shares. Based on these factors, we expect a meaningful increase
in debt during 2007. This debt increase may not occur, however,
and our debt may in fact decrease if we were to sell our office
building portfolio (as described above).
43
In 2005, we entered into a new four-year $250 million
senior revolving credit facility (the Credit
Facility). The Credit Facility bears interest based on
leverage levels at LIBOR plus an applicable margin in the range
of 0.4% to 1.0%. The Credit Facility contains financial
covenants including maximum debt ratios and minimum fixed charge
coverage and net worth requirements. The balance outstanding at
December 31, 2006 was $60.0 million; no balance was
outstanding on the Credit Facility at December 31, 2005.
Management believes that we were in compliance with the
covenants of the Credit Facility at December 31, 2006.
In February 2007, we increased the size of the Credit Facility
to $500 million. None of the material terms of the Credit
Facility were changed in connection with the expansion. Proceeds
from the increased Credit Facility will be used for the
repayment of debt maturing in 2007, development and construction
projects and general corporate purposes.
Senior notes issued in private placements had an outstanding
principal amount of $307.0 million at December 31,
2006 and $407.0 million at December 31, 2005. These
senior notes have financial performance covenants similar to
those in the Credit Facility. In July 2006, we entered into an
amendment agreement with the 2002 noteholders that modifies
certain financial covenants. The amendment provides increased
leverage capacity along with increased flexibility in
maintaining minimum net worth levels. The covenant modifications
were subject to certain conditions, including prepayment of our
$100 million outstanding 2004 senior notes. We paid these
notes in November 2006.
The proceeds of the senior notes were used to finance
development and construction projects, as well as for general
corporate purposes.
During 2005, we assumed an existing mortgage of
$29.9 million on a commercial building we purchased.
We have used community development district (CDD)
bonds to finance the construction of infrastructure improvements
at six of our projects. The principal and interest payments on
the bonds are paid by assessments on, or from sales proceeds of,
the properties benefited by the improvements financed by the
bonds. We record a liability for future assessments which are
fixed or determinable and will be levied against our properties.
In 2005, we paid $10.5 million in principal to one of the
community development districts to pay off a portion of the CDD
bonds. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, we have recorded as debt $43.1 million and
$14.7 million related to CDD bonds as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Through December 31, 2006, our Board of Directors had
authorized a total of $950.0 million for the repurchase of
our outstanding common stock from shareholders from time to time
(the Stock Repurchase Program), of which
$103.8 million remained available at December 31,
2006. There is no expiration date for the Stock Repurchase
Program, and the specific timing and amount of repurchases will
vary based on available cash, market conditions, securities law
limitations and other factors. From the inception of the Stock
Repurchase Program to December 31, 2006, the Company
repurchased from shareholders 27,945,611 shares. During
2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company repurchased from shareholders
948,200, 1,705,000 and 1,561,565 shares, respectively.
Given the challenges presented by the current operating
environment, we will be prudent in our approach to share
repurchase activity over the near term until the depth and
duration of the current downturn in the residential market is
more readily discernible. As a result, we did not purchase any
of our shares on the open market during the fourth quarter of
2006.
Executives have surrendered a total of 2,253,559 shares of
our stock since 1998 in payment of strike prices and taxes due
on exercised stock options and vested restricted stock. For
2006, 2005 and 2004, 148,417 shares worth
$7.6 million, 68,648 shares worth $4.8 million
and 884,633 shares worth $35.3 million, respectively,
were surrendered by executives, of which $7.6 million,
$2.3 million and $13.9 million, respectively, were for
the cash payment of taxes due on exercised stock options and
vested restricted stock.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We are not currently a party to any material off-balance sheet
arrangements as defined in Item 303 of
Regulation S-K.
44
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
627.1
|
|
|
$
|
229.3
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
283.8
|
|
Interest related to debt
|
|
|
139.2
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
Purchase obligations(1)
|
|
|
128.2
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$
|
896.6
|
|
|
$
|
274.6
|
|
|
$
|
240.2
|
|
|
$
|
64.7
|
|
|
$
|
317.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These aggregate amounts include
individual contracts in excess of $2.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expirations Per Period
|
|
|
|
Total Amounts
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Other Commercial Commitments
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Surety bonds
|
|
$
|
64.3
|
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Commitments
|
|
$
|
89.3
|
|
|
$
|
88.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk related
to our long-term debt. As of December 31, 2006, there was
$60.0 million outstanding under our Credit Facility, which
matures on July 21, 2009. This debt accrues interest at
different rates based on timing of the loan and our preferences,
but generally will be either the one, two, three or six month
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a LIBOR
margin in effect at the time of the loan. This loan potentially
subjects us to interest rate risk relating to the change in the
LIBOR rates. We manage our interest rate exposure by monitoring
the effects of market changes in interest rates. If LIBOR had
been 100 basis points higher or lower, the effect on net
income with respect to interest expense on the credit facility
would have been a respective decrease or increase in the amount
of $0.6 million pre-tax ($0.4 million net of tax.)
We have recently expanded the available principal amount of the
Credit Facility to $500 million, and we expect the
outstanding balance borrowed under the Credit Facility to
increase in the near term. An increase in borrowing under the
Credit Facility will cause a corresponding increase in interest
rate risk.
The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted
average interest rates by year of maturity for our long-term
debt. The weighted average interest rates for our fixed-rate
long-term debt are based on the actual rates as of
December 31, 2006. Weighted average variable rates are
based on implied forward rates in the yield curve at
December 31, 2006.
Expected
Contractual Maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Long-term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
$
|
69.2
|
|
|
$
|
52.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
283.8
|
|
|
$
|
425.2
|
|
|
$
|
417.8
|
|
Wtd. Avg. Interest Rate
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
$
|
160.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
201.9
|
|
|
$
|
201.9
|
|
Wtd. Avg. Interest Rate
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
45
Management estimates the fair value of long-term debt based on
current rates available to us for loans of the same remaining
maturities. As the table incorporates only those exposures that
exist as of December 31, 2006, it does not consider
exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a
result, our ultimate realized gain or loss will depend on future
changes in interest rate and market values.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The Financial Statements in pages F-2 to F-33 and the Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
page F-1
are filed as part of this Report and incorporated by reference
thereto.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term
is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in bringing to their
attention on a timely basis material information relating to the
Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be
included in the Companys periodic filings under the
Exchange Act.
(b) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. The Companys internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of the Companys assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria described in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes
that the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006 was effective.
The Companys independent auditors, KPMG LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a
report on managements assessment of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting, which report appears
below.
(c) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
46
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The St. Joe Company:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting, that The St. Joe Company maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The St. Joe Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A Companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A Companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that The St. Joe
Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
Also, in our opinion, The St. Joe Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of The St. Joe Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flow for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 and the
related financial statement schedule, and our report dated
February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements and the related financial
statement schedule.
Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
February 28, 2007
47
(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. During the fourth quarter and year
ended December 31, 2006, there have not been any changes in
our internal controls that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
Amendment of a Material Definitive Agreement and Creation of a
Direct Financial Obligation
In July 2005, we entered into the Third Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Agent, Bank of America,
N.A., as Syndication Agent, each of SunTrust Bank and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents,
and the other lenders party thereto. The Credit Agreement
provided for a $250 million revolving credit facility that
matures on July 21, 2009. A description of the Credit
Agreement may be found in our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 28, 2005, which description is
incorporated by reference. A complete copy of the Credit
Agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to that
Form 8-K.
On February 26, 2007, we exercised our right, pursuant to
Section 2.16 of the Credit Agreement, to increase the
aggregate amount of commitments under the Credit Agreement from
$250 million to $500 million. This increase is set
forth in a first amendment (the Amendment) to the
Credit Agreement. The Amendment also provides for minor
modifications to certain restrictive covenants and definitions
with the effect of permitting qualified installment sales of
timberland by us and excluding from financial covenant
calculations the notes created in connection with such
transactions. The Amendment does not change any pricing,
maturity or other material terms of the Credit Agreement. The
proceeds of any borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be
used for general corporate purposes, which may include debt
payments and development expenditures.
A copy of the Amendment is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The foregoing description of the Amendment does not purport to
be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the full text of the Amendment, which is incorporated by
reference.
From time to time, certain lenders party to the Credit Agreement
and their affiliates have provided, and may in the future
provide, investment banking and commercial banking services and
general financial and other services to us for which they have
in the past received, and may in the future receive, customary
fees. We are currently a party to a mortgage company joint
venture with an affiliate of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association. Certain lenders and their affiliates provide other
loan, securities, credit and banking services to us, all on
commercial terms.
Results of
Operations and Financial Condition
On February 28, 2007 we issued a press release announcing
an update to the Companys financial results for the
quarter and year ended December 31, 2006. A judicial
decision released on February 26, 2007 resulted in a
modification to our litigation reserves as of December 31,
2006. The updated results reflect fourth quarter 2006 net income
of $22.3 million, or $0.30 per share, down from
$23.8 million, or $0.32 per share, as previously reported
February 6, 2007, and full year 2006 net income of
$51.0 million, or $0.69 per share, down from net income of
$52.5 million, or $0.71 per share. A copy of the press
release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Information concerning our directors, nominees for director,
executive officers and certain corporate governance matters is
described in our proxy statement relating to our 2007 annual
meeting of shareholders to be held on May 15, 2007
(the proxy statement). This information is set forth
in the proxy statement under the captions
Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors, Executive Officers, and
Corporate Governance and Related Matters. This
information is incorporated by reference.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information concerning compensation of our executive officers
for the year ended December 31, 2006, is presented under
the caption Executive Compensation and Other
Information in our proxy statement. This information is
incorporated by reference.
48
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information concerning the security ownership of certain
beneficial owners and of management is set forth under the
caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,
Directors and Executive Officers in our proxy statement
and is incorporated by reference.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Our shareholders have approved all of our equity compensation
plans. These plans are designed to further align our
directors and managements interests with the
Companys long-term performance and the long-term interests
of our shareholders.
The following table summarizes the number of shares of our
common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation
plans as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
to be Issued
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities Reflected
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
in the First Column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
780,909
|
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
1,306,902
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
780,909
|
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
1,306,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information regarding our equity compensation
plans, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements under the heading Stock-based
Compensation.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
Information concerning certain relationships and related
transactions during 2006 and director independence is set forth
under the captions Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions and Director Independence in our
proxy statement. This information is incorporated by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
Information concerning our independent auditors is presented
under the caption Audit Committee Information in our
proxy statement and is incorporated by reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule and Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are filed as
part of this Report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedule
The financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying
Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule
is filed as part of this Report.
(3) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits are
filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Report.
49
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated and Amended Articles of
Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the registrants registration statement
on
Form S-3
(File
333-116017)).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of
the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to
the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 14, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of July 22, 2005, among the registrant,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as agent, and the lenders
party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
the registrants current report on
Form 8-K
dated July 28, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First Amendment to Third Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated February 26, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated
as of February 7, 2002, among the registrant and the
purchasers party thereto ($175 million Senior Secured
Notes) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the
registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
First Amendment to
Note Purchase Agreements dated June 8, 2004, by and
among the registrant and certain holders of the
registrants 2002 Senior Notes party thereto (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Second Amendment to
Note Purchase Agreements dated July 28, 2006, by and
among the registrant and the holders of the registrants
2002 Senior Notes party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated
as of August 25, 2005 by and among the registrant and the
purchasers party thereto ($150 million Senior
Notes)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated August 30, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Credit Agreement dated
July 28, 2006 by and among the registrant, Bank of America,
N.A. and Banc of America Securities, LLC (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Employment Agreement between the
registrant and Peter S. Rummell dated August 19, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Form of Executive Employment
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
First Amendment to Employment
Agreement of Michael N. Regan dated January 5, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 9, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan, dated December 28, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the registrants
registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Deferred Capital Accumulation
Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
First Amendment to the Deferred
Capital Accumulation Plan, dated May 22, 2003 and effective
as of June 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 of the registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Second Amendment to the Deferred
Capital Accumulation Plan, dated November 2, 2005 and
effective as of September 8, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Third Amendment to the Deferred
Capital Accumulation Plan, dated as of November 30, 2005
and effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Fourth Amendment to The St. Joe
Company Deferred Capital Accumulation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 22, 2006).
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
First Amendment to the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated May 22, 2003
and effective as of June 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 of the registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Second Amendment to the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated November 2,
2005 and effective as of September 8, 2005 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Third Amendment to The St. Joe
Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 22, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
dated November 30, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 of the registrants registration
statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Amendment to the 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 of the registrants registration
statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Second Amendment to the St. Joe
Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Third Amendment to the St. Joe
Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the St. Joe
Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
1997 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
1998 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
2001 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
333-89146)).
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the
registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock
Agreement-Bonus Award (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 of the registrants annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 23, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Form of Amendment to Restricted
Stock Agreements and Stock Option Agreements (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for
use with grants on or after July 27, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
for use with grants on or after July 27, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director
Compensation (incorporated by reference to the registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 5, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Description of Additional
Compensation for Lead Director (incorporated by reference to the
information contained in the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 15, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director
Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 5, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Form of Director Investment
Election Form (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 5, 2005).
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants current report on
Form 8-K
dated February 17, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Summary of 2006 provisions of the
Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
information set forth under the caption Approval of the
2006 Annual Incentive Plan contained in the
registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 17, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Summary of 2007 provisions of the
Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
information set forth in the registrants current report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 16, 2007).
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Code of Conduct (revised
December 4, 2006)(incorporated by reference to the
registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 7, 2006).
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of The St. Joe
Company.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm for the registrant.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Press Release dated
February 28, 2007.
|
52
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
authorized representative.
The St. Joe Company
Peter S. Rummell
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Dated: February 28, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and as of
February 28, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
/s/ Peter
S. Rummell
Peter
S. Rummell
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ WM.
Britton
Greene
Wm.
Britton Greene
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
N. Regan
Michael
N. Regan
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
L. Ainslie
Michael
L. Ainslie
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hugh
M. Durden
Hugh
M. Durden
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
A. Fanning
Thomas
A. Fanning
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harry
H.
Frampton, III
Harry
H. Frampton, III
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dr.
Adam W.
Herbert, Jr.
Dr.
Adam W. Herbert, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Delores
M. Kesler
Delores
M. Kesler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
S. Lord
John
S. Lord
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Walter
L. Revell
Walter
L. Revell
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H.
Walton, III
William
H. Walton, III
|
|
Director
|
53
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
54
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The St. Joe Company:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
The St. Joe Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flow for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited
financial statement schedule III Consolidated
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation. These consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of The St. Joe Company and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2006, The St. Joe Company
adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based
compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share Based Payment. Also as
discussed in Notes 2 and 13 to the consolidated financial
statements, The St. Joe Company adopted the recognition and
disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, as of
December 31, 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of The St. Joe Companys internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
February 28, 2007
F-1
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investment in real estate
|
|
$
|
1,213,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,174
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
36,935
|
|
|
|
202,605
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
25,839
|
|
|
|
58,905
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
26,029
|
|
|
|
25,701
|
|
Prepaid pension asset
|
|
|
100,867
|
|
|
|
95,044
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
44,593
|
|
|
|
40,176
|
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
35,233
|
|
|
|
36,733
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
32,669
|
|
|
|
46,385
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
44,668
|
|
|
|
50,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,560,395
|
|
|
$
|
1,591,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
627,056
|
|
|
$
|
554,446
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
117,131
|
|
|
|
75,309
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
123,496
|
|
|
|
135,156
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
9,984
|
|
|
|
3,931
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
211,115
|
|
|
|
315,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,088,782
|
|
|
|
1,084,754
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
10,533
|
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value;
180,000,000 shares authorized; 104,372,697 and 103,931,705
issued at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
308,060
|
|
|
|
300,626
|
|
Restricted stock deferred
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,656
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,078,312
|
|
|
|
1,074,990
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, 30,100,032
and 29,003,415 shares held at December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively
|
|
|
(924,259
|
)
|
|
|
(866,962
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
461,080
|
|
|
|
488,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,560,395
|
|
|
$
|
1,591,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
$
|
638,126
|
|
|
$
|
824,800
|
|
|
$
|
734,251
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
|
41,003
|
|
|
|
34,640
|
|
|
|
25,152
|
|
Timber sales
|
|
|
29,937
|
|
|
|
27,974
|
|
|
|
35,218
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
|
|
44,710
|
|
|
|
43,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
748,192
|
|
|
|
932,124
|
|
|
|
838,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sales
|
|
|
407,077
|
|
|
|
526,057
|
|
|
|
485,370
|
|
Cost of rental revenues
|
|
|
16,933
|
|
|
|
13,867
|
|
|
|
10,904
|
|
Cost of timber sales
|
|
|
21,899
|
|
|
|
19,995
|
|
|
|
21,782
|
|
Cost of other revenues
|
|
|
41,649
|
|
|
|
39,827
|
|
|
|
37,626
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
77,385
|
|
|
|
69,436
|
|
|
|
68,885
|
|
Corporate expense, net
|
|
|
51,262
|
|
|
|
48,005
|
|
|
|
43,759
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38,844
|
|
|
|
35,921
|
|
|
|
29,584
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
13,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
669,965
|
|
|
|
753,108
|
|
|
|
699,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
78,227
|
|
|
|
179,016
|
|
|
|
138,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income, net
|
|
|
5,138
|
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(20,566
|
)
|
|
|
(13,920
|
)
|
|
|
(9,964
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(15,954
|
)
|
|
|
(6,391
|
)
|
|
|
(5,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, income
taxes, and minority interest
|
|
|
62,273
|
|
|
|
172,625
|
|
|
|
132,871
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
9,307
|
|
|
|
13,016
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
127,718
|
|
|
|
20,609
|
|
|
|
18,908
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(102,561
|
)
|
|
|
43,544
|
|
|
|
33,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
25,157
|
|
|
|
64,153
|
|
|
|
52,334
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before minority interest
|
|
|
46,423
|
|
|
|
121,488
|
|
|
|
86,137
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
40,286
|
|
|
|
113,668
|
|
|
|
83,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations (net of income tax expense (benefit) of $225, $(199)
and $800, respectively)
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
Gain on sales of discontinued
operations (net of income taxes of $6,354, $7,994 and $3,135,
respectively)
|
|
|
10,368
|
|
|
|
13,322
|
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
10,734
|
|
|
|
12,990
|
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
51,020
|
|
|
$
|
126,658
|
|
|
$
|
90,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
76,030,091
|
|
|
$
|
199,787
|
|
|
$
|
944,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
(637,665
|
)
|
|
$
|
487,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of restricted stock
|
|
|
161,465
|
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted stock
|
|
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends ($0.52 per share)
and other distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,928
|
)
|
Issuances of common stock
|
|
|
2,140,406
|
|
|
|
36,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,591
|
|
Excess tax benefit on exercises of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,310
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
Purchases of treasury shares
|
|
|
(2,446,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,998
|
)
|
|
|
(104,998
|
)
|
Issuance of treasury shares
|
|
|
10,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
75,893,250
|
|
|
$
|
263,044
|
|
|
$
|
994,172
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,649
|
)
|
|
$
|
(742,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
495,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of restricted stock
|
|
|
165,741
|
|
|
|
11,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted stock
|
|
|
(20,891
|
)
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends ($0.60 per share)
and other distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,840
|
)
|
Issuances of common stock
|
|
|
663,838
|
|
|
|
15,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,488
|
|
Excess tax benefit on exercises of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,009
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
Purchases of treasury shares
|
|
|
(1,773,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,806
|
)
|
|
|
(124,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
74,928,290
|
|
|
|
300,626
|
|
|
|
1,074,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,656
|
)
|
|
|
(866,962
|
)
|
|
|
488,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of deferred
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,020
|
|
Transition adjustment for pension
and postretirement benefits, net of tax of $0.6 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of restricted stock
|
|
|
244,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of restricted stock
|
|
|
(104,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends ($0.64 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,698
|
)
|
Issuances of common stock
|
|
|
300,781
|
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
Excess tax benefit on options
exercised and vested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,761
|
|
Amortization of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,767
|
|
Purchases of treasury shares
|
|
|
(1,096,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,297
|
)
|
|
|
(57,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
74,272,665
|
|
|
$
|
308,060
|
|
|
$
|
1,078,312
|
|
|
$
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(924,259
|
)
|
|
$
|
461,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
51,020
|
|
|
$
|
126,658
|
|
|
$
|
90,100
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
40,364
|
|
|
|
40,775
|
|
|
|
36,838
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
13,767
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
7,944
|
|
Minority interest in income
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
|
7,820
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated
joint ventures
|
|
|
(9,307
|
)
|
|
|
(13,016
|
)
|
|
|
(5,600
|
)
|
Distributions of income from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
12,786
|
|
|
|
16,585
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit)
expense
|
|
|
(96,868
|
)
|
|
|
37,575
|
|
|
|
33,427
|
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,009
|
|
|
|
19,310
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Cost of operating properties sold
|
|
|
398,691
|
|
|
|
514,276
|
|
|
|
524,933
|
|
Expenditures for operating
properties
|
|
|
(586,982
|
)
|
|
|
(549,583
|
)
|
|
|
(551,416
|
)
|
Gains on sale of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(16,722
|
)
|
|
|
(21,313
|
)
|
|
|
(4,839
|
)
|
Write-off of previously capitalized
home building costs
|
|
|
9,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
33,050
|
|
|
|
14,347
|
|
|
|
(28,005
|
)
|
Notes receivable and other assets
|
|
|
(17,937
|
)
|
|
|
(33,114
|
)
|
|
|
(37,191
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
18,416
|
|
|
|
13,190
|
|
|
|
33,612
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
15,767
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(143,988
|
)
|
|
|
192,054
|
|
|
|
128,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(14,018
|
)
|
|
|
(19,909
|
)
|
|
|
(9,958
|
)
|
Purchases of investments in real
estate
|
|
|
(6,923
|
)
|
|
|
(106,822
|
)
|
|
|
(82,093
|
)
|
Purchases of short-term
investments, net of maturities and redemptions
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated
affiliates
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(3,411
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
52,876
|
|
|
|
88,823
|
|
|
|
52,883
|
|
Distributions of capital from
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,973
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
29,986
|
|
|
|
(31,930
|
)
|
|
|
(32,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit
agreements
|
|
|
335,000
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit
agreements
|
|
|
(275,000
|
)
|
|
|
(205,000
|
)
|
|
|
(185,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from other long-term debt
|
|
|
100,026
|
|
|
|
359,363
|
|
|
|
119,481
|
|
Repayments of other long-term debt
|
|
|
(106,223
|
)
|
|
|
(258,916
|
)
|
|
|
(44,952
|
)
|
Distributions to minority interests
|
|
|
(13,799
|
)
|
|
|
(2,879
|
)
|
|
|
(2,765
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock
options
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
|
|
13,056
|
|
|
|
15,140
|
|
Dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(47,698
|
)
|
|
|
(45,840
|
)
|
|
|
(39,928
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases
|
|
|
(57,297
|
)
|
|
|
(119,979
|
)
|
|
|
(69,159
|
)
|
Investment by minority interest
partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(51,668
|
)
|
|
|
(52,335
|
)
|
|
|
(58,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(165,670
|
)
|
|
|
107,789
|
|
|
|
37,413
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
202,605
|
|
|
|
94,816
|
|
|
|
57,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
year
|
|
$
|
36,935
|
|
|
$
|
202,605
|
|
|
$
|
94,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
The St. Joe Company (the Company) is a real estate
development company primarily engaged in residential, commercial
and industrial development, and rural land sales. The Company
also has significant interests in timber. While the
Companys real estate operations are in several states
throughout the Southeast, the majority of its real estate
operations, as well as its timber operations, are within the
state of Florida. Consequently, the Companys performance,
and particularly that of its real estate operations, is
significantly affected by the general health of the Florida
economy.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company sold
four of its commercial buildings. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company sold its commercial real
estate services unit, Advantis Real Estate Services Company
(Advantis) to the Advantis management team. Also in
2005, the Company sold four of its commercial buildings. During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company sold two of
its commercial buildings. The Company has reported the sale of
Advantis and the sales of the commercial buildings and their
operations prior to sale as discontinued operations for all
periods presented.
Real
Estate
The Company currently conducts primarily all of its business in
four reportable operating segments: residential real estate
(formerly Towns & Resorts), commercial real estate,
rural land sales, and forestry.
The residential real estate segment develops large-scale, mixed
use resort, primary and seasonal residential communities and
sells housing units and home sites and manages residential
communities. The Company owns large tracts of land in Northwest
Florida, including large tracts near Tallahassee, the state
capital, and significant Gulf of Mexico beach frontage and
waterfront properties. In addition, the Company conducts
residential homebuilding in North Carolina and South Carolina
through Saussy Burbank, Inc. (Saussy Burbank), a
wholly owned subsidiary. The Company is also a partner in five
joint ventures that primarily own and develop residential
property.
The Companys commercial real estate segment owns and
leases commercial, retail, office and industrial properties in
Florida, owns and leases office buildings in Georgia and
Virginia, and sells developed and undeveloped land and buildings.
The rural land sales segment sells parcels of land for a variety
of rural residential and recreational uses from a portion of the
Companys long-held timberlands located primarily in
Northwest Florida.
Forestry
The forestry segment focuses on the management and harvesting of
the Companys extensive timberland holdings, as well as on
the ongoing management of lands which may ultimately be used by
other divisions of the Company. The Company believes it is the
largest private owner of land in Florida, most of which is
currently managed as timberland. The principal products of the
Companys forestry operations are pine pulpwood and timber
and cypress products.
A significant portion of the wood harvested by the Company is
sold under a long-term wood fiber supply agreement with the
Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, also known as Jefferson
Smurfit. The
12-year
agreement, which ends on June 30, 2012, requires an annual
pulpwood volume of 700,000 tons per year that must come from
company-owned fee simple lands. At December 31, 2006,
approximately 332,000 acres were encumbered, subject to
certain restrictions, by this agreement, although the obligation
may be transferred to a third party if a parcel is sold.
F-6
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and all of its majority-owned and controlled
subsidiaries. The operations of Advantis and ten commercial
buildings are included in discontinued operations through the
dates that they were sold. Investments in joint ventures and
limited partnerships in which the Company does not have majority
voting control are accounted for by the equity method. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
(SFAS 150). SFAS 150 requires companies
having consolidated entities with specified termination dates to
treat minority owners interests in such entities as
liabilities in an amount based on the fair value of the
entities. Although FAS 150 was originally effective
July 1, 2003, the FASB has indefinitely deferred certain
provisions related to classification and measurement
requirements for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments
that become subject to FAS 150 solely as a result of
consolidation. As a result, FAS 150 has no impact on the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Income for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The Company has one
consolidated entity with a specified termination date: Artisan
Park, L.L.C. (Artisan Park). At December 31,
2006, the carrying amount of the minority interest in Artisan
Park was $10.5 million, which approximates fair market
value. The Company has no other material financial instruments
that are affected currently by FAS 150.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues consist primarily of real estate sales, timber sales,
rental revenues, and other revenues (primarily consisting of
revenues from club operations and management and brokerage fees).
Revenues from real estate sales, including sales of residential
homes (including detached single-family and attached townhomes)
and home sites, land, and commercial buildings, are recognized
upon closing of sales contracts in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, Accounting for
Sales of Real Estate (SFAS 66). A portion
of real estate inventory and estimates for costs to complete are
allocated to each housing unit based on the relative sales value
of each unit as compared to the sales value of the total
project. Revenues for multi-family residences and Private
Residence Club (PRC) units under construction are
recognized, in accordance with SFAS 66, using the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting when (1) construction is beyond a
preliminary stage, (2) the buyer has made sufficient
deposit and is committed to the extent of being unable to
require a refund except for nondelivery of the unit,
(3) sufficient units have already been sold to assure that
the entire property will not revert to rental property,
(4) sales price is collectible, and (5) aggregate
sales proceeds and costs can be reasonably estimated. Revenue is
recognized in proportion to the percentage of total costs
incurred in relation to estimated total costs. Any amounts due
under sales contracts, to the extent recognized as revenue, are
recorded as contracts receivable. The Company reviews the
collectibility of contracts receivable and, in the event of
cancellation or default, adjusts the
percentage-of-completion
calculation accordingly. Contracts receivable total
$11.9 million and $40.7 million at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Revenue for multi-family residences
and PRC units is recognized at closing using the full accrual
method of accounting if the criteria for using the
percentage-of-completion
method are not met before construction is substantially
completed.
Percentage-of -completion accounting is also used for our home
site sales when required development is not complete at the time
of sale and for commercial and other land sales if there are
uncompleted development costs yet to be incurred for the
property sold.
Revenues from sales of forestry products are recognized
generally on delivery of the product to the customer.
F-7
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Rental revenues are recognized as earned, using the
straight-line method over the life of the lease. Certain leases
provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is
due or where minimum rent payments change during the lease term.
Accordingly, a receivable is recorded representing the
difference between the straight line rent and the
rent that is contractually due from the tenant. Tenant
reimbursements are included in rental revenues.
Other revenues consist of resort and club operations and
management fees. Such fees are recorded as the services are
provided.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank demand
accounts, money market accounts, and repurchase agreements
having original maturities at acquisition date of 90 days
or less.
Investment
in Real Estate
Investment in real estate is carried at cost, net of
depreciation and timber depletion. Depreciation is computed on
straight-line and accelerated methods over the useful lives of
the assets ranging from 15 to 40 years. Depletion of timber
is determined by the units of production method. An adjustment
to depletion is recorded, if necessary, based on the continuous
forest inventory analysis prepared every 5 years.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Depreciation is computed using both straight-line and
accelerated methods over the useful lives of various assets.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141, Business Combinations
(FAS 141), and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (FAS 142), it is the
Companys policy to test goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives for impairment at least annually
unless conditions warrant earlier action, to use the purchase
method of accounting for all business combinations, and to
ensure that, in order for intangible assets acquired in a
purchase method business combination to be recognized and
reported apart from goodwill, the applicable criteria specified
in FAS 141 are met.
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties
to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on
their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land,
buildings on an as-if vacant basis, and tenant improvements. The
Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to
determine the as-if vacant property value. Estimates of value
are made using customary methods, including data from
appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and
other methods. Identifiable intangible assets include amounts
allocated to acquired leases for above- and below-market lease
rates, the value of in-place leases, and the value of customer
relationships.
Above- and below-market rate lease values are recorded based on
the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the
risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference
between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to
the acquired leases and (ii) managements estimate of
fair market lease rates for corresponding leases, measured over
a period equal to the non-cancelable term of the acquired lease.
Above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to
rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
In-place lease value consists of a variety of components
including, but not necessarily limited to, (i) the value
associated with avoiding costs of originating the acquired
in-place leases (i.e., the market cost to execute
F-8
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a lease, including leasing commission, legal, and other related
costs); (ii) the value associated with lost revenue from
existing leases during the re-leasing period; (iii) the
value associated with lost revenue related to tenant
reimbursable operating costs estimated to be incurred during the
re-leasing period (i.e., real estate taxes, insurance, and other
operating expenses); and (iv) the value associated with
avoided incremental tenant improvement costs or other
inducements to secure a tenant lease. In-place lease values are
recognized as amortization expense over the remaining estimated
occupancy period of the respective tenants.
Further, the value of the customer relationship acquired is
considered by management. Customer relationship values are
amortized to expense over a period based on renewal
probabilities for the respective tenants.
Stock-Based
Compensation
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 revised 2004, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), which replaced Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), and
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25). Under the
fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, stock-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is
the vesting period. The Company elected the modified-prospective
method of adoption, under which prior periods are not revised
for comparative purposes. The valuation provisions of
SFAS 123R apply to new grants and to grants that were
outstanding as of the effective date and are subsequently
modified. Estimated compensation for the unvested portion of
grants that were outstanding as of the effective date is being
recognized over the remaining vesting service period using the
compensation cost estimated for the SFAS 123 pro forma
disclosures. Additionally, the 15% discount at which employees
may purchase the Companys common stock through payroll
deductions is being recognized as compensation expense. Upon
exercise of stock options or granting of non-vested stock, the
Company will issue new common stock.
Stock
Options and Non-vested Restricted Stock
The Company has four stock incentive plans (the 1997 Stock
Incentive Plan, the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan and the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan), whereby
awards may be granted to certain employees and non-employee
directors of the Company in the form of restricted shares of
Company common stock or options to purchase Company common
stock. Awards are discretionary and are determined by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Awards vest
based upon service conditions. Certain option and share awards
provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control
(as defined in the plan).The total amount of restricted shares
and options originally available for grant under each of the
Companys four plans was 8.5 million shares,
1.4 million shares, 2.0 million shares, and
3.0 million shares, respectively. All non-vested restricted
shares generally vest over two-year, three-year, or four-year
periods, beginning on the date of each grant, but are considered
outstanding under the treasury stock method at the time of grant
for purposes of determining earnings per share since the holders
are entitled to dividends and voting rights. Stock option awards
are granted with an exercise price equal to market price of the
Companys stock at the date of grant. The options are
exercisable in equal installments on the first through fourth or
fifth anniversaries, as applicable, of the date of grant and
generally expire 7-10 years after the date of grant.
The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to determine the fair value of stock options. The
determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on
the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by
the stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of
other variables. These variables include expected stock price
volatility over the term of the awards, actual and
F-9
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
projected employee stock option exercise behaviors (term of
option), risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.
The Company estimates the expected term of options granted by
incorporating the contractual term of the options and analyzing
employees actual and expected exercise behaviors. The Company
estimates the volatility of its common stock by using historical
volatility in market price over a period consistent with the
expected term, and other factors. The Company bases the
risk-free interest rate that it uses in the option valuation
model on U.S. Treasury seven year issues with remaining
terms similar to the expected term on the options. The Company
anticipates paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future and
therefore uses an estimated dividend yield in the option
valuation model.
Presented below are the per share weighted-average fair value of
stock options granted/converted during 2006, 2005, and 2004
using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, along with the
assumptions used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Per share weighted-average fair
value
|
|
$
|
17.62
|
|
|
$
|
23.21
|
|
|
$
|
11.53
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
1.03
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
4.67
|
%
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
Weighted average expected
volatility
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Total stock-based compensation recognized on the consolidated
statements of income for the three years ended December 31,
2006 as corporate expense is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
$
|
2,784
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
expense
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,972
|
|
|
$
|
10,078
|
|
|
$
|
6,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated
statements of income for stock-based compensation arrangements
was $6.0 million, $2.6 million and $0.9 million
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
F-10
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the pro forma amounts of net
income and net income per share for the respective periods in
2005 and 2004 that would have resulted if the Company had
accounted for employee stock plans under the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123 (in thousands except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$
|
126,658
|
|
|
$
|
90,100
|
|
Add: stock-based employee
compensation expense included in reported net income, net of
taxes
|
|
|
6,299
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
Deduct: total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value based methods
for all awards, net of taxes
|
|
|
(9,282
|
)
|
|
|
(8,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income pro forma
|
|
$
|
123,675
|
|
|
$
|
85,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share as reported
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
Earnings per share pro
forma
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Per share Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share as reported
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Earnings per share pro
forma
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
The following table sets forth the summary of option activity
outstanding under the stock option program for the year ended
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,051,451
|
|
|
$
|
30.64
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
119,873
|
|
|
|
54.24
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(89,634
|
)
|
|
|
53.85
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(300,781
|
)
|
|
|
28.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
780,909
|
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$17.62, $23.21 and $11.53, respectively.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$8.0 million, $32.0 million and $51.5 million,
respectively. The intrinsic value is calculated as the
difference between the market value as of exercise date and the
exercise price of the shares.
The following table presents information regarding all options
outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Number of Options Outstanding
|
|
Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
79,514
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
$
|
15.96-$23.94
|
|
|
$
|
18.91
|
|
569,406
|
|
|
5.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
23.95-$35.91
|
|
|
$
|
29.96
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
7.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
35.92-$53.86
|
|
|
$
|
40.21
|
|
102,989
|
|
|
9.7 years
|
|
|
$
|
53.87-$72.09
|
|
|
$
|
54.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780,909
|
|
|
6.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
15.96-$72.09
|
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents information regarding options
exercisable at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Number of Options Exercisable
|
|
Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
79,514
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
$
|
15.96-$23.94
|
|
|
$
|
18.91
|
|
502,293
|
|
|
5.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
23.95-$35.91
|
|
|
$
|
29.69
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
7.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
35.92-$53.86
|
|
|
$
|
40.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,307
|
|
|
6.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
15.96-$72.09
|
|
|
$
|
28.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options
exercisable as of December 31, 2006 was $16.5 million
and $14.9 million, respectively. In computing compensation
from share based payments as of December 31, 2006, the
Company has estimated that of the 184,602 unvested options
outstanding, 147,682 options are expected to vest. The aggregate
intrinsic value of such options expected to vest was
$1.3 million at December 31, 2006. The intrinsic value
is calculated as the difference between the market value as of
December 31, 2006 and the grant date fair value. The
closing price as of December 31, 2006 was $53.57 per
share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.
Cash received for strike prices from options exercised under
stock-based payment arrangements for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $8.6 million,
$13.1 million and $15.1 million, respectively. The
actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from options
exercised under stock-based arrangements totaled
$3.0 million, $12.0 million and $19.3 million,
respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Non-Vested Restricted Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
890,738
|
|
|
$
|
40.34
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
244,465
|
|
|
|
51.40
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(104,254
|
)
|
|
|
53.59
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(408,603
|
)
|
|
|
34.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
622,346
|
|
|
$
|
46.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted shares
granted during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 was $51.40, $66.86 and $46.35, respectively.
The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$20.9 million, $3.2 million and $1.6 million,
respectively.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company recognized
the estimated compensation cost of non-vested restricted stock
over the vesting term. The estimated compensation cost is based
on the fair value of the Companys common stock on the date
of grant. The Company will continue to recognize the
compensation cost over the vesting term.
As of December 31, 2006, there was $18.5 million of
unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated
forfeitures, related to non-vested stock-based compensation
arrangements. This cost includes $2.9 million related to
stock option grants and $15.6 million of non-vested
restricted stock which will be recognized over a weighted
average period of four years.
Upon the adoption of, and in accordance with SFAS 123R,
deferred compensation of $19.7 million previously reflected
as a component of Stockholders Equity has been netted
against Common Stock as of January 1, 2006, in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Stockholders Equity.
F-12
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Kevin M. Twomey, the Companys former President and Chief
Operating Officer, retired on December 28, 2006 pursuant to
a Board approved succession plan. Mr. Twomey ceased to
serve as an officer of the Company on May 16, 2006. Any of
Mr. Twomeys unvested shares of restricted stock were
vested as of his retirement date. As a result, the increase in
stock-based compensation expense for the year ended
December 31, 2006 in connection with accelerating the
vesting on 243,160 shares (fully amortized as of
May 16, 2006) was $1.0 million.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In November 1999, the Company implemented an employee stock
purchase plan (ESPP) whereby all employees may
purchase the Companys common stock through monthly payroll
deductions at a 15% discount from the fair market value of its
common stock at each month end, with an annual limit of $25,000
in purchases per employee.
Earnings
Per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) is based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted EPS assumes weighted average options have been exercised
to purchase 296,769, 797,629 and 1,201,453 shares of common
stock in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and that 402,975,
573,576 and 243,403 shares of unvested restricted stock
were issued in 2006, 2005 and 2004, each net of assumed
repurchases using the treasury stock method.
Through December 31, 2006, the Board of Directors had
authorized a total of $950.0 million for the repurchase
from time to time of outstanding common stock from shareholders
(the Stock Repurchase Program). A total of
approximately $846.2 million had been expended in the Stock
Repurchase Program from its inception through December 31,
2006. There is no expiration date on the Stock Repurchase
Program.
From the inception of the Stock Repurchase Program to
December 31, 2006, the Company repurchased from
shareholders 27,945,611 shares and executives surrendered a
total of 2,253,559 shares as payment for strike prices and
taxes due on exercised stock options and on vested restricted
stock, for a total of 30,199,170 acquired shares. During 2006,
2005 and 2004, the Company repurchased from shareholders
948,200, 1,705,000 and 1,561,565 shares, respectively.
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, executives surrendered 148,417,
68,648 and 884,633 shares, respectively, as payment for
strike prices and taxes due on exercised stock options and on
vested restricted stock.
Shares of Company stock issued upon the exercise of stock
options in 2006, 2005 and 2004 were 300,781, 663,838, and
2,140,406 shares, respectively.
Weighted average basic and diluted shares, taking into
consideration shares issued, weighted average unvested
restricted shares, weighted average options used in calculating
EPS and treasury shares repurchased, for each of the years
presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
73,719,415
|
|
|
|
74,837,731
|
|
|
|
75,463,445
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
74,419,159
|
|
|
|
76,208,936
|
|
|
|
76,908,300
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Companys
comprehensive income differs from net income due to changes in
the funded status of certain Company benefit plans (see
Note 13). For the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, the Companys comprehensive income is equal to net
income because there were no elements of other comprehensive
income. The Company has elected to disclose comprehensive income
in its Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders
Equity.
F-13
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Taxes
The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting
for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Long-Lived
Assets
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (FAS 144), the operations
and gains on sales reported in discontinued operations include
operating properties sold during the year for which operations
and cash flows can be clearly distinguished and for which the
Company will not have continuing involvement or significant cash
flows after disposition. The operations from these properties
have been eliminated from ongoing operations. Prior periods have
been reclassified to reflect the operations of these properties
as discontinued operations. The operations and gains on sales of
operating properties for which the Company has continuing
involvement are reported as income from continuing operations.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which
the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.
During 2004, the residential real estate segment recorded a
$2.0 million impairment loss related to a residential
project in North Carolina.
Reclassifications
Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified to
conform to the current years presentation.
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
35.1
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
22.7
|
|
Income taxes paid (net of refunds)
|
|
|
125.1
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
F-14
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys non-cash activities for years ended
December 31 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Note receivable in connection with
sale of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable in connection with
sale of unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption of mortgage related to
commercial building purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
Assumption of mortgage by
purchaser of commercial building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
Assumption of debt by purchaser of
commercial land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Execution of debt as payment for
interest in unconsolidated affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Extinguishment of debt in
connection with joint venture
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in Community
Development District Debt
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented
all tax benefits for deductions resulting from the exercise of
stock options as operating cash flows on its consolidated
statement of cash flows. SFAS 123R requires the benefits of
tax deductions in excess of tax benefits related to recognized
compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow,
rather than as an operating cash flow. This requirement reduces
net operating cash flows and increases net financing cash flows
in periods after adoption. Total cash flow remains unchanged
from what would have been reported under prior accounting rules.
Cash flows related to assets ultimately planned to be sold,
including residential real estate development and related
amenities, sales of undeveloped and developed land by the rural
land sales segment, the Companys timberland operations and
land developed by the commercial real estate segment are
included in operating activities on the statement of cash flows.
The Companys buildings developed for commercial rental
purposes and assets purchased with tax-deferred proceeds are
intended to be held for investment purposes and related cash
flows from acquisitions and dispositions of those assets are
included in investing activities on the statements of cash
flows. Cash flows from investing activities also include related
cash flows from assets not held for sale. Distributions of
income from unconsolidated affiliates are included in cash flows
from operating activities; distributions of capital from
unconsolidated affiliates are included in cash flows from
investing activities.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values due to the
short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. The fair
value of the Companys long-term debt, including the
current portion, was $619.7 million and $572.3 million
at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Management
estimates the fair value of long-term debt using the discounted
amount of future cash flows based on the Companys current
incremental rate of borrowing for similar loans.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
F-15
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation
of SFAS Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law.
This Interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for the
financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be
taken in income tax returns. Under FIN 48, tax positions
initially are recognized in the financial statements when it is
more likely than not the tax position will be sustained upon
examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are
measured initially and subsequently as the largest amount of tax
benefit that is greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized
upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority, assuming full
knowledge of the tax position and relevant facts. The Company
will adopt this Interpretation in the first quarter of 2007. The
cumulative effects, if any, of applying FIN 48 will be
recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings as of the
beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating
the impact of FIN 48 on our consolidated financial
statements, but are not yet in a position to determine its
impact.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 establishes a
single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a
framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional
disclosures about fair-value measurements. SFAS 157 applies
only to fair-value measurements that are already required or
permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to
increase the consistency of those measurements. SFAS 157 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We do not believe SFAS 157 will have a material
adverse impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In September 2006, the SEC Staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements (SAB 108).
SAB 108 provides guidance for SEC registrants on how the
effects of uncorrected errors originating in previous years
should be considered when quantifying errors in the current
year. SAB 108 was issued to eliminate diversity in practice
for quantifying uncorrected prior year misstatements (including
prior year unadjusted audit differences) and to address
weaknesses in methods commonly used to quantify such
misstatements. These methods are the income statement or
rollover method and the balance sheet or iron curtain method.
The Company has historically followed the income statement
method. Under SAB 108, SEC registrants will now have to
evaluate errors under both methods. SAB 108 provides
transitional guidance that allows registrants to report the
effect of adoption as a cumulative adjustment to beginning of
year retained earnings. If a cumulative adjustment is reported,
it must be reported as of the beginning of the first fiscal year
ending after November 15, 2006. SAB 108 did not have
an impact on our financial statements at December 31, 2006.
In September 2006, the SEC Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
issued EITF Issue
No. 06-8,
Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyers Continuing
Investment under FAS No. 66 for the Sale of
Condominiums (EITF
06-8).
EITF
06-8 states
that in assessing the collectibility of the sales price pursuant
to paragraph 37(d) of FAS 66, an entity should
evaluate the adequacy of the buyers initial and continuing
investment to conclude that the sales price is collectible. If
an entity is unable to meet the criteria of paragraph 37,
including an assessment of collectibility using the initial and
continuing investment tests described in
paragraphs 8-12
of FAS 66, then the entity should apply the deposit method
as described in
paragraphs 65-67
of FAS 66. EITF
06-8 is
effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2008. The Company has not yet assessed the
impact of EITF
06-8 on its
consolidated financial statements, but believes that it will be
required, in most cases, to collect additional deposits from
buyers in order to recognize revenue under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting. If the Company is unable to meet the
requirements of EITF
06-8, it
would be required to recognize revenue using the deposit method,
which would delay revenue recognition until consumation of the
sale.
F-16
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), on January 1, 2006. We elected the
modified-prospective method of adoption, under which prior
periods are not revised for comparative purposes. Under the fair
value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is
the vesting period. The valuation provisions of SFAS 123R
apply to new grants and to grants that were outstanding as of
January 1, 2006.
The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to determine the fair value of stock options. The
determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on
the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by
our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of
other variables. These variables include our expected stock
price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and
projected employee stock option exercise behaviors (term of
option), risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.
If factors change and the Company were to employ different
assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in
future periods or if the Company decides to use a different
valuation model, the future periods may differ significantly
from what the Company has recorded in the current period and
could materially affect our operating income, net income and net
income per share.
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of stock options. Existing valuation
models, including Black-Scholes, may not provide reliable
measures of the fair values of our stock-based compensation.
Consequently, there is a risk that estimates of the fair values
of our stock-based compensation awards on the grant dates may
bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon the
exercise, expiration, early termination or forfeiture of those
stock-based payments in the future. Certain stock-based
payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless
or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the
fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported
in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be
realized from these instruments that are significantly higher
than the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and
reported in our consolidated financial statements. There
currently is no market-based mechanism or other practical
application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the
estimates stemming from these valuation models, nor is there a
means to compare and adjust the estimates to actual values.
Benefit
Plans
We adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans An Amendment of
SFAS Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R
(SFAS 158) in December 2006. SFAS 158
requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of
financial position an asset for a plans overfunded status
or a liability for a plans underfunded status;
(b) measure a plans assets and its obligations that
determine its funded status as of the end of the employers
fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize
changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement
plan in the year in which the changes occur. Those changes are
reported in comprehensive income of a business entity. The
requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and
the disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the
fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement
to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of
the employers fiscal year-end statement of financial
position is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 158 at
December 31, 2006 resulted in the Company recording an
additional $2.7 million pension asset and an additional
$4.4 million liability related to postretirement medical
benefits. The adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive
income for the pension plan and postretirement medical benefits
were $1.7 million and $(2.7) million net of tax,
respectively, for a net impact of $(1.0) million.
F-17
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During 2005, the Company purchased one commercial building in
Norfolk, Virginia called 150 West Main for
$50.8 million. Of the total purchase price,
$42.0 million was allocated to investment in real estate
and $8.8 million was allocated to lease-related intangible
assets. During 2004, the Company purchased two commercial
buildings in Richmond, Virginia called Overlook for
$19.1 million, two commercial buildings in Atlanta, Georgia
called Deerfield Point for $30.1 million, and a commercial
building in Atlanta, Georgia called Parkwood Point for
$45.0 million. Of the total purchase prices,
$15.5 million, $23.7 million, and $36.1, respectively,
were allocated to investment in real estate and
$3.6 million, $6.4 million, and $8.9 million,
respectively, were allocated to lease-related intangible assets.
Also during 2004, the Company made a final payment of additional
contingent consideration to the former owners of Sunshine State
Cypress in the amount of $2.9 million.
These acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and as such,
the results of their operations are included in the consolidated
financial statements from the date of acquisition. None of the
acquisitions were significant to the financial condition and
operations of the Company in the year in which they were
acquired or the year preceding the acquisition.
During the third quarter of 2006, the Company announced that it
was exiting the Florida homebuilding business to focus on
maximizing the value of its landholdings through place making.
In addition, the Company announced a corporate reorganization
designed to position the Company for the years ahead. The
charges associated with the restructuring and reorganization
program (program) by segment that are included in
the restructuring charge reflected in the 2006 Consolidated
Statement of Income were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real
|
|
|
Commercial Real
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Write-off of previously
capitalized homebuilding costs
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
One-time termination benefits to
employees
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges, pretax
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized homebuilding costs are comprised of architectural
fees and overhead costs. Termination benefits are comprised of
severance-related payments for employees terminated in
connection with the program.
At December 31, 2006, the accrued liability associated with
the program consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Non-Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2006
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Write-off of previously
capitalized homebuilding costs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.3
|
|
|
$
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
One-time termination benefits to
employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
$
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company expects to incur total costs associated with the
program of $14.0 million, of which approximately
$0.6 million is expected to be incurred over the next five
quarters. The Company also expects to incur an additional
$2.4 million related to the 2007 restructuring plan.
|
|
5.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
Discontinued operations for 2006 include the sale and results of
operations of four commercial buildings sold in 2006.
Discontinued operations for 2005 include the sale and results of
operations of Advantis, and the sales and results of operations
of four commercial buildings sold in 2006 and four commercial
buildings sold in 2005. Discontinued operations for 2004 include
the results of operations of Advantis, the eight commercial
buildings sold in 2006 and 2005, and the sale and results of
operations of two commercial buildings sold in 2004, all of
which were previously part of the commercial real estate segment.
On September 7, 2005, the Company sold Advantis for a sales
price of $11.4 million, consisting of $3.9 million in
cash and $7.5 million in notes receivable, for a net of tax
loss of $5.9 million, or $0.08 per share. For the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, Advantis recorded
revenues of $70.0 million and $98.1 million,
respectively. Pre-tax (losses) income from operations were
$(1.6) million and $0.7 million, respectively, for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Under the terms of
the sale, the Company will continue to use Advantis to manage
certain of its commercial properties and Advantis may be
involved in certain sales of Company land which occur in the
future. The Company believes the management contracts are at
market rates and that the Companys on-going involvement
with Advantis is not material to either them or the Company.
Building sales included in discontinued operations for 2006
consisted of the sales of Nextel II in Panama City, Florida
sold on December 20, 2006 for proceeds of $4.9 million
and a pre-tax gain of $1.7 million; One Crescent Ridge in
Charlotte, North Carolina sold on September 29, 2006 for
proceeds of $31.3 million and a pre-tax gain of
$10.6 million; and Prestige Place One & Two in
Tampa, Florida sold on June 28, 2006 for proceeds of
$18.1 million and a pre-tax gain of $4.4 million. For
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, the aggregate revenues generated by these four
buildings were $4.1 million, $6.0 million and
$5.6 million. Aggregate pre-tax operating income was
$0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.5 million for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively.
Building sales included in discontinued operations in 2005
consisted of the sales of 1133 20th Street in Washington,
DC, sold on September 29, 2005 for proceeds of
$46.9 million and a pre-tax gain of $19.7 million;
Lakeview in Tampa, Florida, sold on September 7, 2005 for
proceeds of $18.0 million and a pre-tax gain of
$4.1 million; Palm Court in Tampa, Florida, sold on
September 7, 2005 for proceeds of $7.0 million and a
pre-tax gain of $1.8 million; and Harbourside in
Clearwater, Florida, sold on December 14, 2005 for proceeds
of $21.9 million and a pre-tax gain of $5.2 million.
For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, the aggregate revenues generated by these four
buildings prior to their sales totaled $7.5 million and
$9.7 million. Aggregate pre-tax operating income was
$0.1 million and $0.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Building sales included in discontinued operations in 2004
consisted of the sales of 1750 K Street in Washington, DC, sold
on July 30, 2004 for proceeds of $47.3 million
($21.9 million, net of the assumption of a mortgage by the
purchaser) and a pre-tax gain of $7.5 million; and
Westchase Corporate Center in Houston, Texas, sold on
August 16, 2004 for proceeds of $20.3 million and a
pre-tax gain of $0.2 million. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, aggregate revenues generated by these
two buildings prior to their sales totaled $5.9 million.
Aggregate pre-tax operating income was $0.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
F-19
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Investment
in Real Estate
|
Real estate by segment as of December 31 consists of (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operating property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
104,341
|
|
|
$
|
82,791
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
9,366
|
|
|
|
12,778
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
135,932
|
|
|
|
134,239
|
|
Other
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating property
|
|
|
249,897
|
|
|
|
230,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
623,483
|
|
|
|
427,459
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
56,669
|
|
|
|
46,052
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
7,996
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
Other
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development property
|
|
|
688,442
|
|
|
|
479,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
311,362
|
|
|
|
338,382
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
|
|
6,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment property
|
|
|
320,791
|
|
|
|
346,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated
affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
9,406
|
|
|
|
22,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate investments
|
|
|
1,268,536
|
|
|
|
1,078,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
54,974
|
|
|
|
42,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate
investments
|
|
$
|
1,213,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in operating property are Company-owned amenities
related to residential real estate, the Companys
timberlands and land and buildings developed by the Company and
used for commercial rental purposes. Development property
consists of residential real estate land and inventory currently
under development to be sold. Investment property includes the
Companys commercial buildings purchased with tax-deferred
proceeds and land held for future use.
Real estate properties having a net book value of approximately
$285.6 million (net of accumulated depreciation of
$34.9 million) at December 31, 2006 are leased by the
commercial real estate development segment under non-cancelable
operating leases expiring in various years through 2011.
Expected future aggregate rental income related to these leases
are approximately $180.9 million, of which
$39.2 million, $32.8 million, $27.9 million,
$23.3 million, and $17.2 million is due in the years
2007 through 2011, respectively, and $40.5 million
thereafter.
Depreciation expense was $18.9 million in 2006,
$16.4 million in 2005, and $14.9 million in 2004.
F-20
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company reports lease-related intangible assets separately
for commercial buildings purchased subsequent to the effective
date of FAS 141. See Note 9.
|
|
7.
|
Investment
in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, included in real
estate investments, are recorded using the equity method of
accounting and, as of December 31 consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ALP Liquidating Trust*
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,263
|
|
|
$
|
5,335
|
|
Port St. Joe Development
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,543
|
|
East San Marco L.L.C.
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rivercrest, L.L.C.
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
Paseos, L.L.C.
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
Residential Community Mortgage
Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,406
|
|
|
$
|
22,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Formerly known as Arvida/JMB
Partners, LP.
|
During 2004, the Company purchased a 50% interest in Port St.
Joe Development, entering into a debt agreement in the amount of
$11.4 million as payment. The other party to the joint
venture contributed land with a fair value of equal amount. On
February 3, 2006, the Company purchased the remaining 50%
interest in this venture from Smurfit Stone
Container Corporation for $21.75 million, which consisted
of a cash payment of $11.05 million and the extinguishment
of the Companys debt to the joint venture of
$10.7 million.
Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated
investments on a combined basis is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate, net
|
|
$
|
8,771
|
|
|
$
|
58,078
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
46,515
|
|
|
|
52,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
55,286
|
|
|
|
110,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and other debt
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
|
|
31,966
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
9,560
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
39,518
|
|
|
|
55,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
55,286
|
|
|
$
|
110,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
115,433
|
|
|
$
|
148,456
|
|
|
$
|
184,264
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
93,216
|
|
|
|
119,685
|
|
|
|
169,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
22,217
|
|
|
$
|
28,771
|
|
|
$
|
14,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, as of December 31
consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Transportation property and
equipment
|
|
$
|
34,057
|
|
|
$
|
34,057
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
36,677
|
|
|
|
33,475
|
|
|
|
3-10
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
16,651
|
|
|
|
15,192
|
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
Autos, trucks, and airplanes
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
6,328
|
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,470
|
|
|
|
89,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
66,030
|
|
|
|
62,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,440
|
|
|
|
27,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
18,153
|
|
|
|
13,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,593
|
|
|
$
|
40,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment was
$9.6 million in 2006, $10.5 million in 2005 and
$9.5 million in 2004.
|
|
9.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
During 2006, the Company utilized a discounted cash flow method
to determine the fair value of Sunshine State Cypress and
recorded an impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of
goodwill from $8.8 million to $7.3 million. This
resulted in an impairment loss of $1.5 million pre-tax, or
$0.9 million net of tax. The Company recorded no goodwill
impairment during 2005 or 2004.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
27,937
|
|
|
$
|
14,946
|
|
|
$
|
8,796
|
|
|
$
|
51,679
|
|
Sale of Advantis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
27,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
|
|
36,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
27,937
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,296
|
|
|
$
|
35,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 consisted
of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
In-place lease values
|
|
$
|
40,556
|
|
|
$
|
(16,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
45,862
|
|
|
$
|
(10,868
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
3,824
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
4,013
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
Above-market rate leases
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
(3,457
|
)
|
|
|
6,041
|
|
|
|
(2,168
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Management contracts
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
(4,379
|
)
|
|
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
(3,483
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
57,949
|
|
|
$
|
(25,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
63,478
|
|
|
$
|
(17,093
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets is recorded in the account in
the consolidated statements of income which most properly
reflects the nature of the underlying intangible asset as
follows: (i) above-market rate lease intangibles are
amortized to rental revenue, (ii) in-place lease values are
amortized to amortization expense, and (iii) customer
relationship and management contracts are amortized to
amortization expense. The aggregate amortization of intangible
assets for 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $8.7 million,
$8.5 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
The estimated aggregate amortization from intangible assets for
each of the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,031
|
|
|
$
|
6,725
|
|
2008
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
5,741
|
|
2009
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
4,545
|
|
2010
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
3,545
|
|
2011
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
Accrued liabilities as of December 31 consist of
(thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Property, intangible, and other
taxes
|
|
$
|
39,237
|
|
|
$
|
39,325
|
|
Payroll and benefits
|
|
|
27,651
|
|
|
|
36,334
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
|
|
8,827
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
3,449
|
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
44,748
|
|
|
|
46,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
123,496
|
|
|
$
|
135,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Debt and credit agreements at December 31, 2006 and 2005
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility,
interest payable monthly at LIBOR + 0.55% (5.90% at
December 31, 2006), due July 21, 2009
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Senior notes 2004, interest
payable semiannually at 6.66% to 7.37%, due February 7,
2007 - February 7, 2012
|
|
|
157,000
|
|
|
|
257,000
|
|
Senior notes 2002, interest
payable semiannually at 5.28% to 5.49%, due August 25, 2015
- August 25, 2020
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Bridge loan, interest payable
monthly at LIBOR + 0.55% (5.90% at December 31, 2006), due
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recourse debt, interest
payable monthly at 5.52% - 7.67%, secured by mortgages on
certain commercial property, due January 1, 2008 -
January 1, 2013
|
|
|
101,416
|
|
|
|
113,810
|
|
Promissory note, interest payable
monthly at 7.17%, due June 1, 2008
|
|
|
10,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Development District
debt, secured by certain real estate, due May 1, 2007 -
May 1, 2034, bearing interest at 3.50% to 7.15%
|
|
|
43,098
|
|
|
|
14,726
|
|
Promissory note to an
unconsolidated affiliate, interest payable annually at LIBOR +
100 basis points (5.39% at December 31, 2005), due at the
earlier of the date of the first partnership distribution or
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,689
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds, variable-rate interest payable quarterly based on the
Bond Market Association index (4.02% at December 31, 2006),
secured by a letter of credit, due January 1, 2008
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Various secured and unsecured
notes and capital leases, bearing interest at various rates
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
627,056
|
|
|
$
|
554,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate maturities of debt subsequent to December 31,
2006 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
229.3
|
|
2008
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
2009
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
2010
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
283.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
627.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, the Company entered into an amendment agreement
with its 2002 senior noteholders that modified certain financial
covenants. The amendment provided increased leverage capacity
along with increased flexibility in maintaining minimum net
worth levels, one effect of which is to provide additional
flexibility regarding distributions to shareholders. The Company
also entered into a bridge loan agreement to provide a separate
source of financing to repay its $100.0 million 2004 senior
notes.
During 2005, the Company closed on a new four-year
$250 million senior revolving credit facility (the
Credit Facility) that replaced the existing
$250 million senior revolving credit facility which was to
expire on March 30, 2006. The Credit Facility expires on
July 21, 2009, and bears interest based on leverage levels
F-24
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
at LIBOR plus a margin in the range of 0.4% to 1.0% (currently
0.55%). The Credit Facility contains financial covenants
including maximum debt ratios and minimum fixed charge coverage
and net worth requirements. The average balance outstanding
during 2006 on the Credit Facility was $59.2 million, at an
average interest rate of 6.03%.
In February 2007, the Company increased the size of the Credit
Facility to $500 million. None of the material terms of the
Credit Facility were changed in connection with the expansion.
Proceeds from the increased Credit Facility will be used for the
repayment of debt maturing in 2007, development and construction
projects and general corporate purposes.
During 2005, the Company issued senior notes in a private
placement for an aggregate principal amount of
$150 million, with $65.0 million maturing on
August 25, 2015 and bearing a fixed interest rate of 5.28%,
$65.0 million maturing on August 25, 2017 and bearing
a fixed interest rate of 5.38%, and $20.0 million maturing
on August 25, 2020 and bearing a fixed interest rate of
5.49%. Interest is payable semiannually. The notes contain
financial covenants similar to those in the Companys
Credit Facility.
During 2005, the Company purchased a commercial building and
assumed an existing mortgage on the property in the amount of
$29.9 million, maturing on April 1, 2012. Interest is
payable monthly at an annual fixed rate of 5.62%. Also during
2005, the Company sold a commercial building and used a portion
of the proceeds to repay the balance of the related recourse
debt in the amount of $17.8 million. During 2005, the
Company repaid $10.5 million on one of its Community
Development District debt.
The senior notes and the Credit Facility contain financial
covenants, including minimum net worth requirements, maximum
debt ratios, and fixed charge coverage requirements, plus some
restrictions on prepayment. At December 31, 2006,
management believes the Company was in compliance with the
covenants.
Total income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
December 31 was allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
25,157
|
|
|
$
|
64,153
|
|
|
$
|
52,334
|
|
Gain on the sales of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
7,994
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
800
|
|
Excess tax benefit on stock
compensation credited to stockholders equity
|
|
|
(4,761
|
)
|
|
|
(12,009
|
)
|
|
|
(19,310
|
)
|
Deferred tax expense credited to
accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,342
|
|
|
$
|
59,939
|
|
|
$
|
36,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to income from
continuing operations differed from the amount computed by
applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to pre-tax
income as a result of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Tax at the statutory federal rate
|
|
$
|
22,905
|
|
|
$
|
62,237
|
|
|
$
|
47,557
|
|
State income taxes (net of federal
benefit)
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
6,046
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(4,130
|
)
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,157
|
|
|
$
|
64,153
|
|
|
$
|
52,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities as of December 31 are presented below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State net operating loss
carryforward
|
|
$
|
4,096
|
|
|
$
|
3,185
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
$
|
8,599
|
|
|
$
|
9,896
|
|
Accrued casualty and other reserves
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
Charitable contributions
carryforward
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
Intangible asset amortization
|
|
|
9,365
|
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,010
|
|
|
|
13,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
51,818
|
|
|
|
44,440
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
50,715
|
|
|
|
44,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gain on land sales and
involuntary conversions
|
|
|
201,398
|
|
|
|
295,549
|
|
Prepaid pension asset
|
|
|
38,329
|
|
|
|
35,979
|
|
Income of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
Goodwill amortization
|
|
|
5,630
|
|
|
|
4,273
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,529
|
|
|
|
22,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
261,830
|
|
|
|
360,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
211,115
|
|
|
$
|
315,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, the Company has net operating loss
carryforwards, for State tax purposes of approximately
$136.5 million which expire in years 2023 to 2025.
Realization of the Companys net deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income
in future years in the appropriate tax jurisdictions to obtain a
benefit from the reversal of deductible temporary differences
and from loss carry-forwards. Based on the timing of reversal of
future taxable amounts and the Companys history and future
expectations of reporting taxable income, management believes
that it is more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets
may not be used in the foreseeable future before their expected
expiration, principally State net operating loss carryforwards.
Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established against
these tax benefits.
There were no significant current deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2006 or 2005.
|
|
13.
|
Employee
Benefits Plans
|
Pension
Plan
The Company sponsors a cash balance defined benefit pension plan
that covers substantially all of its salaried employees (the
Pension Plan). Amounts credited to employee accounts
in the Pension Plan are based on the employees years of
service and compensation. The Company complies with the minimum
funding requirements of ERISA. The measurement date of the
Pension Plan is January 1, 2006.
F-26
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Because the Pension Plan has an overfunded balance, no
contributions to the Pension Plan are expected in the near
future.
The weighted average percentages of the fair value of total plan
assets by each major type of plan asset are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset class
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Fixed income including cash
equivalents
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Timber
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
The Companys investment policy is to ensure, over the
long-term life of the Pension Plan, an adequate pool of assets
to support the benefit obligations to participants, retirees and
beneficiaries. In meeting this objective, the Pension Plan seeks
the opportunity to achieve an adequate return to fund the
obligations in a manner consistent with the fiduciary standards
of ERISA and with a prudent level of diversification.
Specifically, these objectives include the desire to:
|
|
|
|
|
invest assets in a manner such that contributions remain within
a reasonable range and future assets are available to fund
liabilities
|
|
|
|
maintain liquidity sufficient to pay current benefits when due
|
|
|
|
diversify, over time, among asset classes so assets earn a
reasonable return with acceptable risk of capital loss
|
The asset strategy established to reflect the growth
expectations and risk tolerance is as follows:
|
|
|
Asset Class
|
|
Tactical range
|
|
Large Cap Equity
|
|
30%-36%
|
Mid Cap Equity
|
|
4%-8%
|
Small Cap Equity
|
|
7%-11%
|
International Equity
|
|
9%-15%
|
|
|
|
Total equities
|
|
55%-65%
|
Fixed Income including cash
equivalents
|
|
35%-45%
|
Timber and other
|
|
0%-1%
|
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets
assumption, the Company considered the current level of expected
returns on risk free investments (primarily government bonds),
the historical level of the risk premium associated with the
other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested and the
expectations for future returns of each asset class. The
expected return for each asset class was then weighted based on
the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term
rate of return on assets assumption for the portfolio. This
resulted in the selection of the 8.0% assumption in 2006, 8.0%
in 2005 and 8.5% in 2004.
F-27
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the net periodic pension cost (credit) follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
4,908
|
|
|
$
|
6,497
|
|
|
$
|
5,588
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,358
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
|
|
8,508
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(17,266
|
)
|
|
|
(18,102
|
)
|
|
|
(19,487
|
)
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment charge
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service costs
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension credit
|
|
$
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension income recognized
|
|
$
|
(5,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts not yet reflected in net periodic pension cost (credit)
and included in accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31, 2006 are:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
4,588
|
|
Accumulated gain
|
|
|
(7,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic pension
cost (credit) over the next fiscal year is $0.7 million.
Assumptions used to develop net periodic pension cost (credit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
|
|
5.65
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Expected long term rate of return
on Plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
A reconciliation of projected benefit obligation as of
December 31 follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation,
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
161,235
|
|
|
$
|
155,750
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
6,497
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,358
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
6,038
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(9,234
|
)
|
|
|
(15,699
|
)
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
Settlement gain
|
|
|
(15,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, end
of year
|
|
$
|
151,971
|
|
|
$
|
161,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to develop end-of period obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
F-28
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The objective of our discount rate assumption was to reflect the
rate at which the pension benefits could be effectively settled.
In making this determination, we took into account the timing
and amount of benefits that would be available under the plan.
To that effect, our methodology for selecting the discount rates
as of December 31, 2006 was to match the plans cash
flows to that of a yield curve that provides the equivalent
yields on zero-coupon corporate bonds for each maturity. Benefit
cash flows due in a particular year can be settled
theoretically by investing them in the zero-coupon
bond that matures in the same year. The discount rate is the
single rate that produces the same present value of cash flows.
The selection of the 5.76% discount rate as of December 31,
2006 represents the equivalent single rate under a broad-market
AA yield curve constructed by Mercer Human Resource Consulting.
A reconciliation of plan assets as of December 31 follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Fair value of assets, beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
248,881
|
|
|
$
|
249,000
|
|
Actual return on assets
|
|
|
29,558
|
|
|
|
16,464
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(15,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and expenses paid
|
|
|
(10,357
|
)
|
|
|
(16,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets, end of year
|
|
$
|
252,838
|
|
|
$
|
248,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of funded status as of December 31 follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
151,971
|
|
|
$
|
161,235
|
|
Market value of assets
|
|
|
252,838
|
|
|
|
248,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
100,867
|
|
|
$
|
87,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized a pension asset of $100.8 million
and $95.0 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation of the Pension
Plan was $150.4 million and $159.6 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Expected benefit payments for the next ten years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Benefit
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
14,783
|
|
2008
|
|
|
11,210
|
|
2009
|
|
|
11,754
|
|
2010
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,127
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
|
64,866
|
|
Postretirement
Benefits
In 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a partial subsidy to fund certain postretirement
medical benefits of currently retired participants and their
beneficiaries, in connection with the previous disposition of
several subsidiaries. No such benefits are to be provided to
active employees. The Board reviews the subsidy annually and may
further modify or eliminate such subsidy at their discretion. A
liability of $8.5 million and $4.2 million has been
included in accrued liabilities to reflect the Companys
obligation to fund postretirement benefits at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The liability at December 31,
2006 represents the funded status of the obligation.
F-29
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred
Compensation Plans and ESPP
The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement plan covering
substantially all officers and employees, which permits
participants to defer up to the maximum allowable amount
determined by the Internal Revenue Service of their eligible
compensation. This deferred compensation, together with Company
matching contributions, which generally equal 50% of employee
deferrals up to a maximum of 6% of their eligible compensation,
is fully vested and funded as of December 31, 2006. The
Company contributions to the plan were approximately
$1.6 million, $2.2 million and $2.0 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(SERP) and a Deferred Capital Accumulation Plan
(DCAP). The SERP is a non-qualified retirement plan
to provide supplemental retirement benefits to certain selected
management and highly compensated employees. The DCAP is a
non-qualified defined contribution plan to permit certain
selected management and highly compensated employees to defer
receipt of current compensation. The Company has recorded
expense in 2006, 2005 and 2004 related to the SERP of
$1.2 million, $2.4 million, $1.3 million,
respectively, and related to the DCAP of $0.8 million,
$1.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Beginning in November 1999, the Company also implemented an
employee stock purchase plan (ESPP), whereby all
employees may purchase the Companys common stock through
payroll deductions at a 15% discount from the fair market value,
with an annual limit of $25,000 in purchases per employee. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, 243,028 and
215,528 shares, respectively of the Companys stock
had been sold to employees under the ESPP Plan.
The Company conducts primarily all of its business in four
reportable operating segments: residential real estate (formerly
Towns & Resorts), commercial real estate, rural land
sales, and forestry. The residential real estate segment
develops and sells home sites and housing units and manages
residential communities. The commercial real estate segment owns
and leases commercial, retail, office and industrial properties
in Florida, owns and leases office buildings in Georgia and
Virginia, and sells developed and undeveloped land and
buildings. The rural land sales segment sells parcels of land
included in the Companys holdings of timberlands. The
forestry segment produces and sells pine pulpwood and timber and
cypress products.
The Company uses income from continuing operations before equity
in income of unconsolidated affiliates, income taxes and
minority interest for purposes of making decisions about
allocating resources to each segment and assessing each
segments performance, which the Company believes
represents current performance measures.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described above in the summary of significant accounting
policies. Total revenues represent sales to unaffiliated
customers, as reported in the Companys consolidated
statements of income. All intercompany transactions have been
eliminated. The caption entitled Other consists of
general and administrative expenses, net of investment income.
The Companys reportable segments are strategic business
units that offer different products and services. They are each
managed separately and decisions about allocations of resources
are determined by management based on these strategic business
units, though effective August 18, 2006, implementation of
strategy and decisions is deployed through geographic-based
managers.
The historical results of operations of RiverCamps on Crooked
Creek have been reclassified from the rural land sales segment
to the residential real estate segment to conform to the current
periods presentation.
F-30
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information by business segment follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
539,564
|
|
|
$
|
738,364
|
|
|
$
|
621,599
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
88,732
|
|
|
|
96,975
|
|
|
|
113,206
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
89,990
|
|
|
|
68,860
|
|
|
|
68,035
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
29,906
|
|
|
|
27,925
|
|
|
|
35,183
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating revenues
|
|
$
|
748,192
|
|
|
$
|
932,124
|
|
|
$
|
838,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates,
income taxes and minority interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
36,595
|
|
|
$
|
155,367
|
|
|
$
|
101,292
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
21,761
|
|
|
|
22,227
|
|
|
|
21,148
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
72,525
|
|
|
|
50,611
|
|
|
|
55,309
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
4,664
|
|
|
|
9,091
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(73,020
|
)
|
|
|
(60,244
|
)
|
|
|
(53,969
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from
continuing operations before equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated affiliates, income taxes and minority interest
|
|
$
|
62,273
|
|
|
$
|
172,625
|
|
|
$
|
132,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
838,773
|
|
|
$
|
666,788
|
|
|
$
|
599,206
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
389,840
|
|
|
|
510,522
|
|
|
|
534,138
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
30,907
|
|
|
|
38,847
|
|
|
|
25,466
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
|
|
147,874
|
|
|
|
90,169
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
151,552
|
|
|
|
227,915
|
|
|
|
154,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,560,395
|
|
|
$
|
1,591,946
|
|
|
$
|
1,403,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
570,925
|
|
|
$
|
568,477
|
|
|
$
|
500,342
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
24,309
|
|
|
|
34,534
|
|
|
|
134,378
|
|
Rural land sales
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
62,350
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
607,923
|
|
|
$
|
676,314
|
|
|
$
|
643,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company has obligations under various noncancelable
long-term operating leases for office space and equipment. Some
of these leases contain escalation clauses for operating costs,
property taxes and insurance. In addition, the Company has
various obligations under other office space and equipment
leases of
F-31
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
less than one year. Total rent expense was $2.5 million,
$2.4 million and $2.9 million, for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
The future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable
long-term operating leases due over the next five years and
thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
2008
|
|
|
424
|
|
2009
|
|
|
337
|
|
2010
|
|
|
82
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company and its affiliates are involved in litigation on a
number of matters and are subject to various claims which arise
in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion
of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on
the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or liquidity. We have established estimated accruals
for our various litigation matters which meet the requirements
of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. However, it is possible that the actual
amounts of liabilities resulting from such matters could exceed
such accruals by several million dollars.
The Company has retained certain self-insurance risks with
respect to losses for third party liability, workers
compensation, property damage, group health insurance provided
to employees and other types of insurance.
At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the
Company was party to surety bonds of $64.3 million and
$46.4 million, respectively, and standby letters of credit
in the amounts of $25.0 million and $30.3 million,
respectively, which may potentially result in liability to the
Company if certain obligations of the Company are not met.
At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the
Company was not liable as guarantor on any credit obligations
that relate to unconsolidated affiliates or others in accordance
with FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.
The Company is subject to costs arising out of environmental
laws and regulations, which include obligations to remove or
limit the effects on the environment of the disposal or release
of certain wastes or substances at various sites, including
sites which have been previously sold. It is the Companys
policy to accrue and charge against earnings environmental
cleanup costs when it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. As
assessments and cleanups proceed, these accruals are reviewed
and adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes
available.
Pursuant to the terms of various agreements by which the Company
disposed of its sugar assets in 1999, the Company is obligated
to complete certain defined environmental remediation.
Approximately $6.7 million was placed in escrow pending the
completion of the remediation. The Company has separately funded
the costs of remediation. Remediation was substantially
completed in 2003. Completion of remediation on one of the
subject parcels occurred during the third quarter of 2006,
resulting in the release of approximately $2.9 million of
the escrowed funds to the Company on August 1, 2006. We
expect the remaining $3.8 million held in escrow to be
released to the Company in early 2007. The release of escrow
funds will not have any effect on our earnings.
F-32
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys former paper mill site in Gulf County and
certain adjacent property are subject to various Consent
Agreements and Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreements with
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The paper
mill site has been assessed and rehabilitated by Smurfit-Stone
Container Corporation in accordance with these agreements. The
Company is in the process of rehabilitating the adjacent
property in accordance with these agreements. Management does
not believe the liability for any remaining required
rehabilitation on these properties will be material.
Other proceedings involving environmental matters are pending
against the Company. It is not possible to quantify future
environmental costs because many issues relate to actions by
third parties or changes in environmental regulation. However,
management believes that the ultimate disposition of currently
known matters will not have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or liquidity. Aggregate environmental-related
accruals were $3.4 million and $4.0 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
16.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
210,667
|
|
|
$
|
177,950
|
|
|
$
|
193,757
|
|
|
$
|
165,818
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
36,793
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
28,533
|
|
|
|
8,569
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
22,346
|
|
|
|
5,984
|
|
|
|
18,984
|
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
Earnings per share
Basic
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Earnings per share
Diluted
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
256,118
|
|
|
$
|
234,005
|
|
|
$
|
258,755
|
|
|
$
|
183,246
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
53,355
|
|
|
|
42,939
|
|
|
|
57,434
|
|
|
|
25,288
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
37,223
|
|
|
|
36,107
|
|
|
|
37,916
|
|
|
|
15,412
|
|
Earnings per share
Basic
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
Earnings per share
Diluted
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Amounts previously reported in
Form 10-Q
for the 2006 and 2005 quarters differ from the amounts reported
herein as a result of the Companys reporting of
discontinued operations.
F-33
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
DECEMBER 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Periods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings &
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
Land & Land
|
|
|
Buildings and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Bay County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
$
|
3,342
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,849
|
|
|
$
|
29,523
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,523
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
13,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,316
|
|
|
|
14,316
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,226
|
|
|
|
53,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,682
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,184
|
)
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calhoun County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,399
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duval County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
22,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,281
|
|
|
|
26,281
|
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,745
|
|
|
|
30,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Unimproved Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
Gadsden County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
3,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,362
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-1
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III
(CONSOLIDATED) REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings &
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
Land & Land
|
|
|
Buildings and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gulf County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
5,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,826
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,848
|
|
|
|
126,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
|
|
23,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,609
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hillsborough County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferson County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leon County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,220
|
|
|
|
17,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,638
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
21,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,905
|
|
|
|
26,905
|
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
28,571
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,612
|
|
|
|
31,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liberty County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
11,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,306
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manatee County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
24,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,357
|
|
|
|
35,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-2
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III
(CONSOLIDATED) REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings &
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
Land & Land
|
|
|
Buildings and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Orange County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
11,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,733
|
|
|
|
9,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,463
|
|
|
|
50,463
|
|
|
|
8,901
|
|
Osceola County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,998
|
|
|
|
28,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palm Beach County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Pinellas County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Johns County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,270
|
|
|
|
7,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,277
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
8,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,058
|
|
|
|
34,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volusia County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
6,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,759
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
2,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,228
|
|
|
|
73,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wakulla County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
2,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Unimproved Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III
(CONSOLIDATED) REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings &
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
Land & Land
|
|
|
Buildings and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Walton County,
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
|
|
20,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,537
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,487
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,279
|
|
|
|
36,279
|
|
|
|
5,123
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
6,277
|
|
|
|
10,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,775
|
|
|
|
128,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Florida
Counties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
13,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,085
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
60,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,528
|
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,074
|
|
|
|
160,074
|
|
|
|
14,965
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
59,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,395
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Unimproved land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,479
|
|
|
|
75,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unimproved Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-4
THE ST.
JOE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III
(CONSOLIDATED) REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company
|
|
|
Carried at Close of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings &
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
|
Land & Land
|
|
|
Buildings and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land with infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
|
29,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,430
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,788
|
|
|
|
57,788
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS
|
|
$
|
145,706
|
|
|
$
|
258,807
|
|
|
$
|
299,791
|
|
|
$
|
705,722
|
|
|
$
|
870,316
|
|
|
$
|
388,814
|
|
|
$
|
1,259,130
|
|
|
$
|
54,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(A) |
The aggregate cost of real estate owned at December 31,
2006 for federal income tax purposes is approximately
$786.0 million.
|
(B) Reconciliation of real estate owned (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
1,056,475
|
|
|
$
|
936,478
|
|
|
$
|
878,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Capitalized
|
|
|
626,621
|
|
|
|
706,254
|
|
|
|
615,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Retired or Adjusted
|
|
|
(423,966
|
)
|
|
|
(586,257
|
)
|
|
|
(557,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Close of Period
|
|
$
|
1,259,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,475
|
|
|
$
|
936,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C
|
)
|
|
Reconciliation of accumulated
depreciation (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Year
|
|
$
|
42,328
|
|
|
$
|
34,888
|
|
|
$
|
30,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
|
19,831
|
|
|
|
18,840
|
|
|
|
14,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Retired or Adjusted
|
|
|
(7,185
|
)
|
|
|
(11,400
|
)
|
|
|
(10,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Close of Period
|
|
$
|
54,974
|
|
|
$
|
42,328
|
|
|
$
|
34,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-5
Exhibit 10.2
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND
RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT (this
"Amendment") dated as of February 26, 2007 by and among THE ST. JOE COMPANY (the
"Borrower"), each of the Lenders party hereto, and WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Agent (the "Agent").
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Lenders, the Agent and certain other parties
have entered into that certain Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of July 22, 2005 (as in effect immediately prior to the date hereof, the
"Credit Agreement") and the Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent desire to amend
certain provisions of the Credit Agreement on the terms and conditions contained
herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties
hereto hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. Specific Amendments to Credit Agreement. The parties hereto
agree that the Credit Agreement is amended as follows:
(a) The Credit Agreement is amended by adding the following definitions to
Section 1.1. thereof in the appropriate alphabetical-order location:
"QUALIFIED INSTALLMENT SALE NOTE" means a promissory note evidencing
the consideration due to the seller in a Qualified Installment Sale
Transaction, which promissory note is secured by a standby letter of
credit, guaranty or other similar form of credit enhancement (a) issued
for the account of the purchaser in such Qualified Installment Sale
Transaction by a Person having a Credit Rating of A or A2 from at least
one Rating Agency at the time of issuance and (b) in an amount not less
than the principal amount of such promissory note plus accrued interest
for a period which is at least thirty days longer than the interval at
which interest is due and payable under such promissory note.
"QUALIFIED INSTALLMENT SALE TRANSACTION" means the sale of real and
personal property of the Borrower or a Subsidiary in exchange for a
Qualified Installment Sale Note issued by the purchaser of such real and
personal property, which Qualified Installment Sale Note is assigned,
together with the standby letter of credit, guaranty or other similar form
of credit enhancement securing such instrument, for cash to a Qualified
SPE which in turn will issue its Qualified Senior Notes to a trustee
acting on behalf of Persons acquiring interests in such Qualified Senior
Notes in a private placement.
"QUALIFIED SENIOR NOTE" means the senior promissory note(s) issued
by a Qualified SPE to a trustee acting on behalf of Persons acquiring
interests in such note(s) in a private placement in connection with a
Qualified Installment Sale Transaction and secured solely by a Qualified
Installment Sale Note and related letter of credit, guaranty or other
similar form of credit enhancement held by such Qualified SPE.
"QUALIFIED SPE" means a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Borrower
formed as a special purpose entity in connection with a Qualified
Installment Sale Transaction for the sole purpose of (a) owning and
holding the Qualified Installment Sale Note issued in connection with such
Qualified Installment Sale Transaction, together with the standby letter
of credit, guaranty or other similar form of credit enhancement securing
such Qualified Installment Sale Note, (b) issuing a Qualified Senior Note
to be secured solely by such Qualified Installment Sale Note and related
standby letter of credit, guaranty or other similar form of credit
enhancement and (c) and engaging in other activities incidental to the
foregoing.
(b) The Credit Agreement is amended by restating the definition of "Land"
contained in Section 1.1. thereof in its entirety as follows:
"LAND" means (i) land on which no development (other than
improvements that are not material or are temporary in nature) has
occurred and (ii) land on which a project is currently under development
so long as the calculation of Total Asset Value does not include any NOI
attributable to such Property. For purposes of this Agreement, Land shall
be valued as follows:
(a) $50,000 per acre for acreage related to the Borrower's
Residential Real Estate segment which is either entitled or currently in
the entitlement process;
(b) $2,000 per acre for acreage related to the Borrower's
Residential Real Estate segment which is neither entitled nor currently in
the entitlement process;
(c) $8,000 per acre for acreage related to the Borrower's Rural Land
Sales segment which is either entitled or currently in the entitlement
process;
(d) $1,500 per acre for acreage related to the Borrower's Rural Land
Sales segment which is neither entitled nor currently in the entitlement
process;
(e) $40,000 per acre for acreage related to Borrower's Commercial
segment which is either entitled or currently in the entitlement process;
(f) $1,750 per acre for acreage related to Borrower's Commercial
segment which is neither entitled or in the entitlement process;
-2-
(g) $1,500 per acre for acreage classified by the Borrower as ANRR
Right-of-Way, Conservation/Mitigation, Corporate, Mitigation, or Overlap;
and
(h) $1,200 per acre for acreage classified by the Borrower as
Timberland or not elsewhere classified by the Borrower.
For Land valuation purposes, the Borrower's RiverCamps and WhiteFence
Farms projects will be included in subparagraphs (c) or (d) above, as
appropriate. For the avoidance of doubt, a project is deemed entitled when
all major discretionary governmental land-use approvals have been
received. The Borrower, the Agent and each of the Lenders acknowledge that
an entitled project may require additional permits for development and/or
build-out and also may be subject to legal challenge. The per acre values
set forth above will be reviewed on each anniversary date of the Agreement
Date and adjusted as requested by the Borrower and consented to by the
Requisite Lenders or as otherwise reasonably determined by the Requisite
Lenders in good faith after consultation with the Borrower.
(c) The Credit Agreement is amended by adding to the end of Section 9.1.
the following paragraph:
For purposes of determining compliance with the covenants contained in the
immediately preceding subsections, (x) Indebtedness attributable to
Qualified Senior Notes (and any Interest Expense thereon) shall be
excluded, (y) Qualified Installment Sale Notes shall not be included in
determinations of Total Asset Value and (z) any interest income
attributable to Qualified Installment Sale Notes shall be excluded.
(d) The Credit Agreement is amended by adding to the end of Section 9.3.
the following sentence:
Indebtedness in respect of Qualified Senior Notes shall not be subject to
this Section.
(e) The Credit Agreement is amended by restating Section 9.4.(b) in its
entirety as follows:
(b) Investments consisting of loans, advances or extensions of
credit to, or purchases or other acquisitions of any Indebtedness of,
another Person not a Subsidiary, with the value of such Investments being
determined in accordance with GAAP, provided that loans evidenced by
Qualified Installment Sale Notes shall not be subject to this subsection;
and
(f) The Credit Agreement is amended by adding to the end of Section 9.4.
the following paragraph:
-3-
For purposes of determining compliance with the covenant contained in this
Section, Qualified Installment Sale Notes shall not be included in the
determination of Total Asset Value.
(g) The Credit Agreement is amended by deleting the word "and" at the end
of Section 9.5.(f), relettering Section 9.5.(g) as Section 9.5.(h) and adding
the following subsection (g) to Section 9.5.:
(g) Investments in Qualified Installment Sale Notes; and
(h) The Credit Agreement is amended by restating subsections (b) and (c)
of Section 9.6. in their entirety as follows:
(b) The Borrower shall not, and shall not permit any Subsidiary or
other Loan Party to, enter into, assume or otherwise be bound by any
Negative Pledge except for a Negative Pledge contained in (i) an agreement
(x) evidencing Indebtedness which the Borrower or such Subsidiary may
create, incur, assume, or permit or suffer to exist under Section 9.3.,
(y) which Indebtedness is secured by a Lien permitted to exist under the
Credit Documents, and (z) which prohibits the creation of any other Lien
on only the property securing such Indebtedness as of the date such
agreement was entered into; (ii) an agreement relating to the sale of a
Subsidiary or assets pending such sale, provided that in any such case the
Negative Pledge applies only to the Subsidiary or the assets that are the
subject of such sale; (iii) Section 10.6 of the 2002 Note Purchase
Agreements and of the 2004 Note Purchase Agreements, in each case, as in
effect on the Agreement Date; (iv) Additional Note Purchase Agreements (as
defined in the Intercreditor Agreement) so long as any such Negative
Pledge is on terms substantially similar to the Negative Pledge contained
in Section 10.6 of the 2002 Note Purchase Agreements and of the 2004 Note
Purchase Agreements, in each case, as in effect on the Agreement Date; and
(v) agreements relating to a Qualified Installment Sale Transaction,
including organizational documents of a Qualified SPE, so long as any such
Negative Pledge applies only to the assets that are owned by the Qualified
SPE.
(c) The Borrower shall not, and shall not permit any Subsidiary
(other than an Excluded Subsidiary) or other Loan Party to, create or
otherwise cause or suffer to exist or become effective any consensual
encumbrance or restriction of any kind on the ability of any Subsidiary
(other than an Excluded Subsidiary) to: (i) pay dividends or make any
other distribution on any of such Subsidiary's capital stock or other
equity interests owned by the Borrower or any Subsidiary; (ii) pay any
Indebtedness owed to the Borrower or any Subsidiary; (iii) make loans or
advances to the Borrower or any Subsidiary; or (iv) transfer any of its
property or assets to the Borrower or any Subsidiary.
- 4 -
(i) The Credit Agreement is amended by restating Section 9.11. in its
entirety as follows:
The Borrower shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries
or any other Loan Party to, permit to exist or enter into, any transaction
(including the purchase, sale, lease or exchange of any property or the
rendering of any service) with any Affiliate (other than a Loan Party),
except transactions in the ordinary course of the business of the Borrower
or any of its Subsidiaries and upon terms which are no less favorable to
the Borrower or such Subsidiary than would be obtained in a comparable
arm's length transaction with a Person that is not an Affiliate; provided,
however, Qualified Installment Sale Transactions shall not be subject to
the requirement that they be in the ordinary course of business.
(j) The Credit Agreement is amended by restating Section 10.1.(e)(i) in
its entirety as follows:
(i) The Borrower, any Subsidiary or any other Loan Party shall fail
to pay when due and payable, within any applicable grace or cure period,
the principal of, or interest on, any Indebtedness (other than the Loans
and Reimbursement Obligations and Indebtedness in respect of Qualified
Senior Notes) having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of
$25,000,000 or more ("Material Indebtedness"); or
Section 2. Conditions Precedent. The effectiveness of this Amendment is
subject to receipt by the Agent of each of the following, each in form and
substance satisfactory to the Agent:
(a) A counterpart of this Amendment duly executed by the Borrower and the
Requisite Lenders; and
(b) Such other documents, instruments and agreements as the Agent may
reasonably request.
Section 3. Increase of Commitments; Joinder and Representations of New
Lenders. In connection with the Borrower's exercise of its right to increase the
aggregate amount of the Commitments pursuant to Section 2.16. of the Credit
Agreement, the parties hereto agree that:
(a) Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, each Lender and such
Lender's respective Commitment is as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.
(b) Each Lender that was not party to the Credit Agreement immediately
prior to giving effect to this Amendment (a "New Lender") (i) represents and
warrants that it is (A) legally authorized to enter into this Amendment and to
become a Lender under the Credit Agreement and (B) an "accredited investor" (as
such term is used in Regulation D of the Securities Act); (ii) confirms that it
has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, together with copies of the most
recent financial statements delivered by the Borrower pursuant thereto and such
other documents and information (including without limitation the Loan
Documents) as
-5-
such New Lender has deemed appropriate to make its own credit analysis and
decision to become a Lender; (iii) appoints and authorizes the Agent to take
such action as contractual representative on such New Lender's behalf and to
exercise such powers under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents as
are delegated to the Agent by the terms thereof, together with such powers as
are reasonably incidental thereto; (iv) acknowledges and agrees that it will
become a party to and shall be bound by the Credit Agreement and the other Loan
Documents to which the other Lenders are a party as of the date hereof and will
perform in accordance therewith all of the obligations which are required to be
performed by it as if such New Lender were an original Lender under and
signatory to the Credit Agreement and (v) agrees to make the payments required
to be made by such Lender under Section 2.16. of the Credit Agreement.
Section 4. Representations. The Borrower represents and warrants to the
Agent and the Lenders that:
(a) Authorization. The Borrower has the right and power, and has taken all
necessary action to authorize it, to execute and deliver this Amendment and to
perform its obligations hereunder and under the Credit Agreement, as amended by
this Amendment, in accordance with their respective terms. This Amendment has
been duly executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer of the Borrower
and each of this Amendment and the Credit Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment, is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable
against the Borrower in accordance with its respective terms except as the same
may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, and other similar laws affecting the
rights of creditors generally and the availability of equitable remedies for the
enforcement of certain obligations (other than the payment of principal)
contained herein or therein and as may be limited by equitable principles
generally.
(b) Compliance with Laws, etc. The execution and delivery by the Borrower
of this Amendment and the performance by the Borrower of this Amendment and the
Credit Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, in accordance with their
respective terms, do not and will not, by the passage of time, the giving of
notice or otherwise: (i) require any Government Approvals or violate any
Applicable Laws relating to the Borrower or any other Loan Party; (ii) conflict
with, result in a breach of or constitute a default under the organizational
documents of the Borrower or any other Loan Party, or any indenture, agreement
or other instrument to which the Borrower or any other Loan Party is a party or
by which it or any of its respective properties may be bound; or (iii) result in
or require the creation or imposition of any Lien upon or with respect to any
property now owned or hereafter acquired by the Borrower or any other Loan
Party.
(c) No Default. No Default or Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing as of the date hereof nor will exist immediately after giving effect
to this Amendment.
Section 5. Reaffirmation of Representations by Borrower. The Borrower
hereby repeats and reaffirms all representations and warranties made by the
Borrower to the Agent and the Lenders in the Credit Agreement and the other Loan
Documents to which it is a party on and as of the date hereof with the same
force and effect as if such representations and warranties were
-6-
set forth in this Amendment in full, except for changes in factual circumstances
not prohibited under the Credit Documents.
Section 6. Certain References. Each reference to the Credit Agreement in
any of the Loan Documents shall be deemed to be a reference to the Credit
Agreement as amended by this Amendment.
Section 7. Expenses. The Borrower shall reimburse the Agent upon demand
for all costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) incurred by
the Agent in connection with the preparation, negotiation and execution of this
Amendment and the other agreements and documents executed and delivered in
connection herewith.
Section 8. Benefits. This Amendment shall be binding upon and shall inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and
assigns.
Section 9. GOVERNING LAW. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND
CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTS EXECUTED, AND TO BE FULLY PERFORMED, IN SUCH STATE.
Section 10. Effect. Except as expressly herein amended, the terms and
conditions of the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents remain in full
force and effect. The amendments contained herein shall be deemed to have
prospective application only, unless otherwise specifically stated herein.
Section 11. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and shall be
binding upon all parties, their successors and assigns.
Section 12. Definitions. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein are used herein with the respective definitions given them in the Credit
Agreement.
[Signatures on Next Page]
-7-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment
to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to be executed as of the date
first above written.
THE ST. JOE COMPANY
By: /s/ Stephen W. Solomon
---------------------------------------------
Name: Stephen W. Solomon
Title: Senior Vice President and Treasurer
WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
individually and as Agent
By: /s/ Cathy A. Casey
---------------------------------------------
Name: Cathy A. Casey
Title: Managing Director
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
By: /s/ Denise M. Bell
---------------------------------------------
Name: Denise M. Bell
Title: Senior Vice President
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Edwin S. Poole, III
---------------------------------------------
Name: Edwin S. Poole, III
Title: Vice President
SUNTRUST BANK
By: /s/ Kimberly S. Evans
---------------------------------------------
Name: Kimberly S. Evans
Title: Director
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Wayne P. Robertson
---------------------------------------------
Name: Wayne P. Robertson
Title: Senior Vice President
REGIONS BANK
By: /s/ Elaine B. Passman
---------------------------------------------
Name: Elaine B. Passman
Title: Vice President - Corporate Banking
COMERICA BANK, a Michigan Banking Corporation
By: /s/ William Piana
---------------------------------------------
Name: William Piana
Title: Vice President
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO.
By: /s/ C. William Buchholz
---------------------------------------------
Name: C. William Buchholz
Title: Senior Vice President
FIFTH THIRD BANK
By: /s/ John A. Marian
---------------------------------------------
Name: John A. Marian
Title: Vice President
CAROLINA FIRST BANK
By: /s/ Abraham Swartz
---------------------------------------------
Name: Abraham Swartz
Title: Assistant Vice President
GREENSTONE FARM CREDIT SERVICES, ACA/FLCA
By: /s/ Jeff Pavlik
---------------------------------------------
Name: Jeff Pavlik
Title: Assistant Vice President - Lending
Officer
NORTHWEST FARM CREDIT SERVICES, PCA
By: /s/ Casey Kinzer
---------------------------------------------
Name: Casey Kinzer
Title: Account Manager
BMO CAPITAL MARKETS FINANCING, INC.
By: /s/ Aaron Lanski
---------------------------------------------
Name: Aaron Lanski
Title: Vice President
EXHIBIT A
Lender Commitments
LENDER COMMITMENT
- ----------------------------------------- ------------
Wachovia Bank, National Association $ 59,000,000
Bank of America, N.A. $ 59,000,000
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association $ 59,000,000
SunTrust Bank $ 40,000,000
Branch Banking and Trust Company $ 44,000,000
Regions Bank $ 44,000,000
Fifth Third Bank $ 35,000,000
PNC Bank, National Association $ 35,000,000
Carolina First Bank $ 30,000,000
Comerica Bank $ 25,000,000
Greenstone Farm Credit Services, ACA/FLCA $ 25,000,000
Northwest Farm Credit Services, PCA $ 25,000,000
BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc. $ 20,000,000
TOTAL: $500,000,000
Exhibit 10.23
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE ST. JOE COMPANY
1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
This second amendment to The St. Joe Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan") is made pursuant to Sections 4 and 15 thereof, and is effective as
of January 1, 2002.
1. The first paragraph of Section 6 shall be amended to read in full as follows:
"ELECTION TO PARTICIPATE. Once an employee becomes an Eligible Employee,
that employee may become a Participant effective on the first day of the
month after he or she becomes eligible, or on the first day of any later
payroll period, provided that at least thirty (30) days prior to the date
the payroll deductions are to begin the Eligible Employee files a properly
completed Enrollment Form with the persons designated by the Compensation
Committee. If an Enrollment Form is filed less than thirty (30) days prior
to the date payroll deductions are to begin, the Company will accommodate
such request as of the intended effective date if it is administratively
feasible to do so. Such regular payroll deductions shall be subject to the
provisions and limitations of Section 9. All regular payroll deductions
shall be held by the Company until the funds are forwarded to the
Custodian for purchase of shares."
All provisions of the Plan not specifically mentioned in this amendment shall be
considered modified to the extent necessary to be consistent with the changes
made in this amendment.
THE ST. JOE COMPANY
Date: May 29, 2002 /s/ Rachelle Gottlieb
---------------------------------------
By: Rachelle Gottlieb
Title: Vice President, Human Resources
Exhibit 10.24
THIRD AMENDMENT
TO
THE ST. JOE COMPANY 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN ("JOESHARE")
This THIRD AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to The St. Joe Company 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is made pursuant to Sections 4 and 15
thereof, and shall be effective January 1, 2003.
1. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN EMPLOYEES. Section 5 of the Plan shall be amended
in its entirety to read as follows:
"5. ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES. Any employee of the Company, its Subsidiaries
organized under the laws of any state in the United States, and any
Subsidiary designated by the Compensation Committee which is
organized under the laws of any jurisdiction outside of the United
States, shall be eligible to participate in the Plan, except that
the following classes shall be excluded:
(a) workers who are treated as independent contractors (regardless
of whether they are later determined by a court of law or
governmental authority to be common-law employees);
(b) leased employees;
(c) a director of the Company or of any Subsidiary who is not an
employee;
(d) workers whose customary employment is for not more than five
(5) months in any calendar year (seasonal or temporary
employees); and
(e) employees who have not been employed for at least ninety (90)
days.
This Section 5 is subject to the provisions of Section 9."
2. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY RE-ENTRY DATE. The second paragraph of Section 6
of the Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"A Participant may cease, re-start, increase or decrease that
Participant's payroll deduction, at any time by filing a new Enrollment
Form at least thirty (30) days prior to such change, in accordance with
procedures adopted by the Compensation Committee. If an Enrollment Form is
filed less than thirty (30) days prior to such change, the Company will
accommodate such request as of the intended effective date if it
determines in its sole discretion that it is administratively feasible to
do so."
3. EXCLUSION OF DRAWS. The following sentence shall be added to the end of
Section 6:
"Any draw paid to a Participant on or after January 29, 2003, may not be
used to purchase Common Stock under this Plan."
4. DEFAULT BENEFICIARY. The last sentence of Section 14 of the Plan shall
be replaced with the following:
"If a named beneficiary does not survive the Participant, such
beneficiary's share shall be delivered to the Participant's remaining
named beneficiaries according to their percentages. If there are no
surviving beneficiaries or the Participant has not designated a
beneficiary under this Plan, the Participant's Investment Account shall be
delivered the Participant's surviving spouse; or if there is no surviving
eligible spouse, in equal shares to any surviving children of the
Participant; or if neither of the above survive the Participant, to the
Participant's estate."
Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms, provisions, and
conditions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and are hereby ratified and
confirmed as being in full force and effect.
Executed as of this 31st day of December by the duly authorized officer of the
Company.
THE ST. JOE COMPANY
By: /s/ Rachelle Gottlieb
-------------------------------
Rachelle Gottlieb
Vice President - Human Resources
Exhibit 10.25
FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO
THE ST. JOE COMPANY 1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN ("JOESHARE")
This FOURTH AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to The St. Joe Company 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is made pursuant to Sections 4 and 15
thereof, and shall be effective January 1, 2004.
Section 14 is hereby amended in full to read as follows:
"14. RETIREMENT, TERMINATION AND DEATH. In the event of a Participant's
retirement, termination of active employment, or death, certificates will
be issued or shares will be sold as provided in Section 11, provided,
however, that the Company may adopt deadlines for any such elections to be
made and default procedures. In the event of a Participant's death, the
beneficiary designated by the Participant in a writing filed with the
Company shall have the rights described above. If a named beneficiary does
not survive the Participant, such beneficiary's share shall be delivered
as described above to the Participant's remaining named beneficiaries
according to their percentages. If there are no surviving beneficiaries or
the Participant has not designated a beneficiary under this Plan, the
Participant's Investment Account shall be delivered as described above to
the Participant's surviving spouse; or if there is no surviving eligible
spouse, in equal shares to any surviving children of the Participant; or
if neither of the above survive the Participant, to the Participant's
estate."
Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms, provisions, and
conditions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and are hereby ratified and
confirmed as being in full force and effect.
Executed as of this 31st day of December, 2003, by the duly authorized officer
of the Company.
THE ST. JOE COMPANY
By: /s/ Rachelle Gottlieb
-----------------------------
Rachelle Gottlieb
Vice President - Human Resources
Exhibit 21.1
THE ST. JOE COMPANY
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
(includes 100% directly owned entities, indirectly owned entities and joint
venture entities of which we may be a majority, equal or
minority partner)
STATE OF
COMPANY NAME ORGANIZATION
Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company FL
Artisan Park, L.L.C. DE
Arvida Housing L.P., Inc. DE
Arvida Mid-Atlantic Homes, Inc. NC
C Ridge One, L.L.C. FL
Crooked Creek Utility Company FL
Deerfield Park, LLC GA
Deer Point I & II, LLC FL
Eagle Point, L.L.C. FL
East San Marco, LLC FL
Georgia Wind I, LLC FL
Georgia Wind II, LLC FL
Georgia Wind III, LLC FL
McNeill Burbank Homes, LLC NC
Millenia Park One, L.L.C. FL
Monteith Holdings, LLC NC
Overlook I & II, LLC FL
Paradise Pointe, L.L.C. FL
Park Point, LLC FL
Park Point Land, LLC FL
Paseos Mortgage, LLC DE
Paseos Title, LLC DE
Paseos, LLC DE
Plume Street, LLC DE
Plume Street Manager, LLC DE
PSJ Development L.P. DE
PSJ Waterfront, LLC FL
Residential Community Mortgage Company, LLC DE
Residential Community Title Company DE
Rivercrest Mortgage, LLC DE
Rivercrest Title, LLC DE
Rivercrest, LLC DE
Riverside Corporate Center, L.L.C. FL
Saussy Burbank, Inc. NC
SJP Technology Company FL
Southeast Bonded Homebuilder Warranty Association,
L.L.C. FL
Southeast Insurance Company VT
Southhall Center, L.L.C. FL
St. James Island Utility Company FL
St. Joe Capital I, Inc. DE
St. Joe Central Florida Contracting, Inc. FL
St. Joe Community Sales, Inc. FL
St. Joe Development, Inc. FL
St. Joe Finance Company FL
St. Joe Home Building, L.P. DE
St. Joe Land Company FL
St. Joe Northeast Florida Contracting, Inc. FL
St. Joe Residential Acquisitions, Inc. FL
St. Joe Timberland Company of Delaware, L.L.C. DE
St. Joe Towns & Resorts, L.P. DE
St. Joe Utilities Company FL
St. Joe West Florida Contracting, Inc. FL
St. Joe/Arvida Company, Inc. FL
St. Joe-Southwood Properties, Inc., FL
Sunshine State Cypress, Inc. FL
SweetTea Publishing, L.L.C. FL
Talisman Sugar Corporation FL
The Port St. Joe Marina, Inc. FL
The St. Joe Community Foundation, Inc. FL
Victoria Park Mortgage, Inc. FL
280 Interstate North, L.L.C. DE
5660 NND, L.L.C. FL
exv23w1
EXHIBIT 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
The St. Joe Company:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-23571, No. 333-43007, No. 333-51726,
No. 333-51728, No. 333-106046, No. 333-127344, and No.
333-127345) on Forms S-8 of The St. Joe Company of our reports dated
February 28, 2007, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of The St. Joe Company as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flow for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and related financial statement
schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31,
2006 annual report on Form 10-K of The
St. Joe Company.
Our
report, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, refers
to the adoption by the Company of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123(R), Share-Based Payment effective January 1, 2006 and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
effective December 31, 2006.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Certified
Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
February 28, 2007
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Peter S. Rummell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of The St.
Joe Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors:
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter S. Rummell
|
|
|
Peter S. Rummell |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael N. Regan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of The St.
Joe Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors:
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael N. Regan
|
|
|
Michael N. Regan |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 USC §1350, the undersigned officer of The St. Joe Company (the Company)
hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter S. Rummell
|
|
|
Peter S. Rummell |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Dated: February 28, 2007
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 USC §1350, the undersigned officer of The St. Joe Company (the Company)
hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael N. Regan
|
|
|
Michael N. Regan |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Dated: February 28, 2007
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
THE ST. JOE COMPANY (NYSE: JOE) REVISES FULL YEAR 2006 NET
INCOME FROM $0.71 PER SHARE TO $0.69 PER SHARE, FOLLOWING
JUDICIAL DECISION
JACKSONVILLE, Florida (February 28, 2007) The St. Joe Company (NYSE: JOE) today announced
that it has revised its previously announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year
2006, following a judicial decision released February 26, 2007, relating to a 1996 sales commission
dispute. Due to this recent event, a modification is being made to JOEs litigation reserves as of
December 31, 2006.
As a result, JOEs Net Income for the fourth quarter 2006 has been revised to $22.3 million,
or $0.30 per share, down from $23.8 million, or $0.32 per share as previously reported February 6,
2007. Full year 2006 Net Income has been revised to $51.0 million, or $0.69 per share, down from
Net Income of $52.5 million, or $0.71 per share. All per share references are presented on a
diluted basis.
Financial information for JOEs full year 2006 results can be found on our Form 10-K being
filed today with the SEC.
The St. Joe Company (NYSE: JOE), a publicly held company based in Jacksonville, is one of
Floridas largest real estate development companies. We are primarily engaged in real estate
development and sales, with significant interests in timber. Our mission is to create places that
inspire people and make JOEs Florida an even better place to live, work and play. Were no
ordinary JOE.
More
information about JOE can be found at our web site at
www.joe.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this press release that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements
about our beliefs, plans, goals, expectations and intentions. Forward-looking statements involve
risk and uncertainty, and there can be no assurance that the results described in such statements
will be realized. Such statements are based on our current expectations and we undertake no
obligation to publicly update or reissue any forward-looking statements. Risk factors that may
cause the actual results to differ are described in this press release and in various documents we
have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
# # #
© 2007, The St. Joe Company. St. Joe, JOE and the
Taking Flight design are service marks of The St. Joe Company.